I have a page with many links. Browsers like
to underline the links -- result is ugly.
Is there any (CSS?) way to prevent underlining?
(By the way, I decry the common practice
of making links hard to see -- at least
color them.)
Mason C 15 16120
Mason A. Clark wrote: I have a page with many links. Browsers like to underline the links -- result is ugly.
Is there any (CSS?) way to prevent underlining?
Yes. http://www.w3.org/TR/REC-CSS2/text.h...ext-decoration
(By the way, I decry the common practice of making links hard to see -- at least color them.)
Most visitors to a site also expect links to be underlined, ugly as it
is. Unless you take measures like creating an obvious menu, links will
go unnoticed. IF you choose to remove underlines, take extra effort to
make it very very clear that your chosen style is a link.
--
Stan McCann "Uncle Pirate" http://stanmccann.us/pirate.html
Webmaster/Computer Center Manager, NMSU at Alamogordo
Cooordinator, Tularosa Basin Chapter, ABATE of NM; AMA#758681; COBB
'94 1500 Vulcan (now wrecked) :( http://motorcyclefun.org/Dcp_2068c.jpg
A zest for living must include a willingness to die. - R.A. Heinlein
Uncle Pirate <st**@surecann.com> wrote: Mason A. Clark wrote: Is there any (CSS?) way to prevent underlining? Most visitors to a site also expect links to be underlined, ugly as it is. Unless you take measures like creating an obvious menu, links will go unnoticed. IF you choose to remove underlines, take extra effort to make it very very clear that your chosen style is a link.
And be sure not to rely on color or boldfacing to do it. Both have
major isses attached.
Mason A. Clark wrote: I have a page with many links. Browsers like to underline the links -- result is ugly.
Is there any (CSS?) way to prevent underlining?
See the text-decoration property.
(By the way, I decry the common practice of making links hard to see -- at least color them.)
And what if I'm colour-blind? I agree that the usual underlining is a
bit harsh: my usual solution is to use a subtle border-bottom with hover
effects. See the site in my sig for an example.
--
Mark. http://tranchant.plus.com/
Kerberos <me@privacy.net> wrote: Neal <ne*****@yahoo.com>:
And be sure not to rely on color or boldfacing to do it. Both have major isses attached.
This is what I use most of the time. What do you suggest instead?
Underlining. It means "link" to WWW users. Colors mean nothing if the
user's eyes or equipment cannot handle color well. Bolding isn't bad
really (so long as you don't set it on hover but not on link, of
course) but underlining is the way people expect to find links.
The only un-underlined links ("derlined" links? :D ) I use are in a
list of what are clearly navigational elements.
>Mason A. Clark wrote: I have a page with many links. Browsers like to underline the links -- result is ugly.
Is there any (CSS?) way to prevent underlining?
Yes. http://www.w3.org/TR/REC-CSS2/text.h...ext-decoration
(By the way, I decry the common practice of making links hard to see -- at least color them.)
Ha! I got slammed for the underlines, then I got
slammed for thinking of eliminating them.
Mason C loser I'll do it my way.
Question: Is table page-formatting permitted on this
news group? http://OakRoadSystems.com/
ha, gotcha
(revenge for sarcastic comment)
Mason C
On Thu, 6 Jan 2005, Mason A. Clark wrote:
[ various stuff, including ] Mason C loser I'll do it my way.
If your opinion of usenet is so low, I guess you'd have nothing
against being put into the killfile. As one sows, so shall one reap.
bye now.
Mason A. Clark wrote: Mason A. Clark wrote:
I have a page with many links. Browsers like to underline the links -- result is ugly.
Is there any (CSS?) way to prevent underlining?
Yes. http://www.w3.org/TR/REC-CSS2/text.h...ext-decoration
(By the way, I decry the common practice of making links hard to see -- at least color them.)
Ha! I got slammed for the underlines, then I got slammed for thinking of eliminating them.
Mason C loser I'll do it my way.
If you think I slammed you, then you are way too thin skinned for
usenet. And if you can't take a little constuctive criticism and learn
from it, you've no business creating web pages at all. Don't bother
replying as I probably won't see it. *plonk*
--
Stan McCann "Uncle Pirate" http://stanmccann.us/pirate.html
Webmaster/Computer Center Manager, NMSU at Alamogordo
Cooordinator, Tularosa Basin Chapter, ABATE of NM; AMA#758681; COBB
'94 1500 Vulcan (now wrecked) :( http://motorcyclefun.org/Dcp_2068c.jpg
A zest for living must include a willingness to die. - R.A. Heinlein
On Thu, 6 Jan 2005 23:02:27 -0500, Stan Brown <th************@fastmail.fm>
wrote: "Mason A. Clark" wrote in comp.infosystems.www.authoring.stylesheets:Ha! I got slammed for the underlines, then I got slammed for thinking of eliminating them.
Whoever "slammed" you for having underlined links has no idea of how to do a user interface. Their opinion is about a worthwhile as that of someone who tells you to write your PIN on your ATM card.
Thanks. I'm reassured that underline is ok, good in fact.
I was amazed at the number of web sites that
have "hidden" links to be searched for using the
mouse as a mine detector.
Also amazed at the humourless thin skins on this css site.
Mason C table-user in the css killfiles
for id only: http://masonc.home.netcom.com
Mason A. Clark <ma*******@THISix.netcom.comQQQ> wrote: I was amazed at the number of web sites that have "hidden" links to be searched for using the mouse as a mine detector.
Most web sites have poor usability, terrible accessibility, broken tag-soup
markup, etc.
Most of the regulars in CIWAS try to do better.
Also amazed at the humourless thin skins on this css site.
CSS site? What CSS site? This is a USENET discussion group.
--
Darin McGrew, mc****@stanfordalumni.org, http://www.rahul.net/mcgrew/
Web Design Group, da***@htmlhelp.com, http://www.HTMLHelp.com/
"FAILURE IS NOT AN OPTION. It comes bundled with the software." This discussion thread is closed Replies have been disabled for this discussion. Similar topics
2 posts
views
Thread by Franklin P Patchey |
last post: by
|
33 posts
views
Thread by Thomas Mlynarczyk |
last post: by
|
6 posts
views
Thread by Paul Kaufman |
last post: by
|
4 posts
views
Thread by crhaynes |
last post: by
|
3 posts
views
Thread by debbie |
last post: by
|
3 posts
views
Thread by shapper |
last post: by
|
5 posts
views
Thread by Bubba |
last post: by
|
13 posts
views
Thread by Casimir Pohjanraito |
last post: by
|
10 posts
views
Thread by JD |
last post: by
| | | | | | | | | | |