Dear Group,
The Site under the following link
( http://tomasio.laudatio.com/temp/schiepek/index.html) displays as I
want it to in IE 6 (under Win XP) but does not render correctly in
Firefox 1.0. As usually Firefox does HTML and CSS better than IE, I
would like to know what kind of mistake I made in coding the site.
I think it has to do with the "float"-property in the text selectors
(copy, h1, h2). the width of the text seems to be consumed by the
width of the image to its left in firefox :(
Please help, I need to fix this very urgently.
Kind regards
--
kind regards,
tomasio
"describing an issue reveals the way to solve it" 21 2798
On Thu, 18 Nov 2004 15:07:47 +0100, tomasio <da****@jan.et> wrote: Dear Group,
[...] you want [...]
--
Webontwerp <http://home.wanadoo.nl/b.de.zoete/html/webontwerp.html>
Zweefvliegen <http://home.wanadoo.nl/b.de.zoete/html/vliegen.html>
Blog <http://home.wanadoo.nl/b.de.zoete/_private/weblog.html>
DTD <http://home.wanadoo.nl/b.de.zoete/dtd/not_so_strict.dtd>
On Thu, 18 Nov 2004 17:55:26 +0100, tomasio <da****@jan.et> wrote: Lauri Raittila <la***@raittila.cjb.net> schrieb:
in comp.infosystems.www.authoring.html, tomasio wrote:
Do not multipost. http://www.hut.fi/u/jkorpela/usenet/xpost.html
I answered in ciwas. Hi Lauri,
Could you be so kind to answer in this NG also? strangely enough, but my new ISP seems not to host comp.infosystems.www.authoring.stylesheets.
Silly to send it there then.
-- kind regards,
Your sig separator is broken.
Also: <http://www.individual.net/>
--
Webontwerp <http://home.wanadoo.nl/b.de.zoete/html/webontwerp.html>
Zweefvliegen <http://home.wanadoo.nl/b.de.zoete/html/vliegen.html>
Blog <http://home.wanadoo.nl/b.de.zoete/_private/weblog.html>
DTD <http://home.wanadoo.nl/b.de.zoete/dtd/not_so_strict.dtd>
"Barbara de Zoete" <b_********@hotmail.com> schrieb: On Thu, 18 Nov 2004 17:55:26 +0100, tomasio <da****@jan.et> wrote:
Lauri Raittila <la***@raittila.cjb.net> schrieb:
in comp.infosystems.www.authoring.html, tomasio wrote:
Do not multipost. http://www.hut.fi/u/jkorpela/usenet/xpost.html
I answered in ciwas. Hi Lauri,
Could you be so kind to answer in this NG also? strangely enough, but my new ISP seems not to host comp.infosystems.www.authoring.stylesheets.
Silly to send it there then.
-- kind regards,
Your sig separator is broken.
Also: <http://www.individual.net/>
First: Did I ask you for your opinion? Nope. Second: Are you able to
post something sensible also? Third: Shove your rules and conventions
up your ***.
Yours
--
kind regards,
tomasio
"describing an issue reveals the way to solve it"
tomasio wrote: First: Did I ask you for your opinion? Nope.
You did post on a newsgroup read by many people. If you don't want people
to reply, don't post.
Second: Are you able to post something sensible also?
She posted this: Also: <http://www.individual.net/>
This is a fantastic free newsserver which allows you to access the
newsgroup which seems to be most appropriate for your issue. Her post was
extremely sensitive to your situation - she even gave the URL to the
solution to one of your issues! You should be thanking her. But instead,
we get...
Third: Shove your rules and conventions up your ***.
You're pretty fucking cocky, considering you're the one looking for people
to help you.
I won't be helping you, not after that little tantrum.
Neal <ne*****@yahoo.com> schrieb: tomasio wrote:
First: Did I ask you for your opinion? Nope.
You did post on a newsgroup read by many people. If you don't want people to reply, don't post.
Second: Are you able to post something sensible also?
She posted this:
Also: <http://www.individual.net/>
This is a fantastic free newsserver which allows you to access the newsgroup which seems to be most appropriate for your issue. Her post was extremely sensitive to your situation - she even gave the URL to the solution to one of your issues! You should be thanking her. But instead, we get...
Third: Shove your rules and conventions up your ***.
You're pretty fucking cocky, considering you're the one looking for people to help you.
I won't be helping you, not after that little tantrum.
I have to apologize for my behaviour a few hours ago. Based on
misunderstoodings I was thinking, Barbara was making fun of my
problems. As I suffered a little from deadlline pressure (don't know
if there's a right expression in English for this) and - most of all -
of the funeral of my granddad which is due to happen today, I reacted
in an unappropriate way.
Sorry for that.
--
kind regards,
tomasio
"describing an issue reveals the way to solve it"
On Fri, 19 Nov 2004 08:40:42 +0100, tomasio <da****@jan.et> wrote: I have to apologize for my behaviour a few hours ago.
Oh, ok. Have some cake.
tomasio wrote: "Barbara de Zoete" <b_********@hotmail.com> schrieb:
Your sig separator is broken. First: Did I ask you for your opinion?
Welcome to usenet!
Second: Are you able to post something sensible also?
Far more useful then what you've contributed in the past day or so.
Third: Shove your rules and conventions up your ***.
*plonk*
Yours -- kind regards, tomasio "describing an issue reveals the way to solve it"
P.S. Your sig delimeter is still broken.
--
Brian (remove "invalid" to email me)
Brian <us*****@julietremblay.com.invalid> schrieb: P.S. Your sig delimeter is still broken.
Hi Brian,
As you seem not to read posts till the end, I deleted most of your
reaction. You know your text and the sense it makes.
I apologized for my behaviour in a previous thread already. Go through
the thread and you may find it.
What really made me curious is the thing about my "broken"
sig-delimiter. especially as i am using NG since about one year now,
and did not change it since then. furthermore, nobody ever complained
about it and in my newsreader (agent) it appears correctly.
--
kind regards,
tomasio
"describing an issue reveals the way to solve it"
On Mon, 22 Nov 2004 17:11:25 +0100, tomasio <da****@jan.et> wrote: I apologized for my behaviour in a previous thread already.
Apologizing doesn't mean the other person has to like you at an instand.
What really made me curious is the thing about my "broken" sig-delimiter.
Try replying to your own post and see what happens to your signature. It
gets included in the quoted text. It is supposed to disappear. That's what
that separator is for.
Fix it and make friends. Google for it (Outlook Express en sig separator
or something; I don't know, I don't use Outlook Express)
--
Weblog | <http://home.wanadoo.nl/b.de.zoete/_private/weblog.html>
Webontwerp | <http://home.wanadoo.nl/b.de.zoete/html/webontwerp.html>
Zweefvliegen | <http://home.wanadoo.nl/b.de.zoete/html/vliegen.html>
Barbara de Zoete said the following on 11/22/04 17:39: On Mon, 22 Nov 2004 17:11:25 +0100, tomasio <da****@jan.et> wrote:
I apologized for my behaviour in a previous thread already.
Apologizing doesn't mean the other person has to like you at an instand.
What really made me curious is the thing about my "broken" sig-delimiter.
Try replying to your own post and see what happens to your signature. It gets included in the quoted text. It is supposed to disappear. That's what that separator is for. Fix it and make friends. Google for it (Outlook Express en sig separator or something; I don't know, I don't use Outlook Express)
Neither is he:
X-Newsreader: Forte Agent 2.0/32.652
;)
--
Regards
Harrie
On Mon, 22 Nov 2004 18:03:31 +0100, Harrie <sp*****@linux.org.invalid>
wrote: Barbara de Zoete said the following on 11/22/04 17:39:
On Mon, 22 Nov 2004 17:11:25 +0100, tomasio <da****@jan.et> wrote:
I apologized for my behaviour in a previous thread already. Apologizing doesn't mean the other person has to like you at an instand.
What really made me curious is the thing about my "broken" sig-delimiter. Try replying to your own post and see what happens to your signature. It gets included in the quoted text. It is supposed to disappear. That's what that separator is for. Fix it and make friends. Google for it (Outlook Express en sig separator or something; I don't know, I don't use Outlook Express)
Neither is he:
X-Newsreader: Forte Agent 2.0/32.652
;)
Whoops. Just assumed. How did he ruine his sig separator using Forte Agent?
--
Weblog | <http://home.wanadoo.nl/b.de.zoete/_private/weblog.html>
Webontwerp | <http://home.wanadoo.nl/b.de.zoete/html/webontwerp.html>
Zweefvliegen | <http://home.wanadoo.nl/b.de.zoete/html/vliegen.html>
On Mon, 22 Nov 2004 17:11:25 +0100, tomasio <da****@jan.et> wrote: Brian <us*****@julietremblay.com.invalid> schrieb:
P.S. Your sig delimeter is still broken.
What really made me curious is the thing about my "broken" sig-delimiter. especially as i am using NG since about one year now, and did not change it since then. furthermore, nobody ever complained about it and in my newsreader (agent) it appears correctly.
Your delimiter is:
--
It should be:
--[SPACE]
There's a space after the two '-'s. Without that, the signature appears in
the reply. With the space, it is automatically dropped.
--
Like this. Reply and see for yourself. See where the post is cut off, and
the sig begins.
Neal <ne*****@yahoo.com> schrieb: On Mon, 22 Nov 2004 17:11:25 +0100, tomasio <da****@jan.et> wrote:
Brian <us*****@julietremblay.com.invalid> schrieb:
P.S. Your sig delimeter is still broken.
What really made me curious is the thing about my "broken" sig-delimiter. especially as i am using NG since about one year now, and did not change it since then. furthermore, nobody ever complained about it and in my newsreader (agent) it appears correctly.
Your delimiter is:
--
It should be:
--[SPACE]
There's a space after the two '-'s. Without that, the signature appears in the reply. With the space, it is automatically dropped.
Thank you, Brian. I changed the sig and added the missing space. If I
additionally find a solution to my css-prob, i will post it in
comp.infosystems. www.authoring.css (only ;-)
--
kind regards,
tomasio
"describing an issue reveals the way to solve it"
tomasio wrote: Neal schrieb: There's a space after the two '-'s. Without that, the signature appears in the reply. With the space, it is automatically dropped.
Thank you, Brian.
You're welcome, Phil.
On Mon, 22 Nov 2004 17:11:25 +0100, tomasio <da****@jan.et> wrote: Brian <us*****@julietremblay.com.invalid> schrieb:P.S. Your sig delimeter is still broken.
What really made me curious is the thing about my "broken" sig-delimiter. especially as i am using NG since about one year now...
Depends on where you did learn about it in the first place...
Correct "sig-delimiter" or "tear mark" as it should really be called
is...
--
i.e. "dashdashspacenewline"
If you use a Usenet conforming user agent to reply to a post, that agent
will use the above character sequence as a signal to cut out the rest of
your post, usually your signature, so that it does not get posted in
replies over and over again.
As you have already figured out, Microsoft decided that this old Usenet
common convention should be broken in OE, just to set an MS "signature"
on that particular product.
They invented a most inviting form of "reply to message" template too,
where the naive user will just start typing where s/he is invited to do
so, with the dreaded "top post" as a result and, where just about
everything that has already been said in a thread gets posted over and
over again hanging as a tail on the last post in the thread.
Needless to say, if one comes in to an all top-posted thread that has
been going for a while, it is close to impossible to find out who said
what and in what context. It is really confusing and usually shunned by
experienced usenauts.
--
Rex
Jan Roland Eriksson wrote: They invented a most inviting form of "reply to message" template too, where the naive user will just start typing where s/he is invited to do so, with the dreaded "top post" as a result and, where just about everything that has already been said in a thread gets posted over and over again hanging as a tail on the last post in the thread.
Funny, Opera does the same thing - the cursor starts on top. It's never
been a problem for me to do it correctly. I feel "quote-fix" patches which
move the cursor to the bottom might promote bottom-posting but they also
promote failure to snip extra unneeded text.
On Tue, 23 Nov 2004 22:55:35 -0500, Neal <ne*****@yahoo.com> wrote:
[Illustration of an OE message start where the cursor sits here]
--
My Signature sits here for as many lines it contains
and the original message, including its signature, is
hanging below this point. Jan Roland Eriksson wrote: They invented a most inviting form of "reply to message" template too, where the naive user will just start typing where s/he is invited to do so...
Funny, Opera does the same thing - the cursor starts on top.
Most news readers do that AFAIK. The problem with OE is that it stuffs
the signature in between the starting cursor pos and the rest of the
message so the sig becomes a "psychological barrier" that prevents
people to go on to selectively comment on the original message.
It's never been a problem for me to do it correctly...
In the case of OE it requires one to cut out ones own signature and
paste it back at the very bottom of the original message before one
can start to edit and reply to a message.
--
Rex
in comp.infosystems. www.authoring.html, Neal wrote: Jan Roland Eriksson wrote:
They invented a most inviting form of "reply to message" template too, where the naive user will just start typing where s/he is invited to do so, with the dreaded "top post" as a result and, where just about everything that has already been said in a thread gets posted over and over again hanging as a tail on the last post in the thread.
Funny, Opera does the same thing - the cursor starts on top.
The problem is not that cursor is on top. In fact, it has been in all
programs I have used. The problem was *signature* on top.
--
Lauri Raittila <http://www.iki.fi/lr> <http://www.iki.fi/zwak/fonts>
On Wed, 24 Nov 2004 09:17:09 +0100, Roland Eriksson <jr****@newsguy.com>
wrote: On Tue, 23 Nov 2004 22:55:35 -0500, Neal <ne*****@yahoo.com> wrote: [Illustration of an OE message start where the cursor sits here]
If one top-posts, that is the result, indeed.
If one manually clicks at the end of the message, then this problem is
avoided. If the technology does it for you, however, the result seems to
normally be that the whole thread is included with no snippage.
While tech that puts your cursor at the bottom prevents top-posting and
all the problems connected to it, it throws the baby out with the
bathwater in that the uninitiated user is deluded into thinking that
there's no work left to do.
I'd rather see people develop the ability to snip and bottom-post without
the technology than to install a technology that leads to nearly as many
problems. This thread has been closed and replies have been disabled. Please start a new discussion. Similar topics
by: Niels |
last post by:
Hi group,
I have some problems with clearing floated divs. My usual method works fine in Konqueror, but not in Firefox. Here's an example:
<html><body>
<div id='left' style='float:left;...
|
by: Boris |
last post by:
Please open http://www.highscore.de/opera/floatleft.html in Opera 7.54 and
Firefox 1.0 Preview. Who is right?
In my humble opinion Opera 7.54 is right: According to CSS 2.1 a "floating
box must...
|
by: tomasio |
last post by:
Dear Group,
The Site under the following link
(http://tomasio.laudatio.com/temp/schiepek/index.html) displays as I
want it to in IE 6 (under Win XP) but does not render correctly in
Firefox...
|
by: Spondishy |
last post by:
Hi,
I have a problem with divs and padding in IE6 and Firefox. Basically my
example that I have attached works exactly how I want in IE6, but
padding is treated differently in Firefox. My...
|
by: bryanrite |
last post by:
I have two floating divs within a 100% width container div. In IE when
you resize the window to the point where the text should wrap, it wraps
and extends the height of the container div. In...
|
by: Johnny |
last post by:
In MSIE table captions are displayed at the same size as content. But
in Firefox the text displays at browser default, It also exceeds the
width of the table and the excess is hidden if the table...
|
by: john_aspinall |
last post by:
http://www.ainewmedia.co.uk/test.htm
Im learning CSS based layout and Im pulling my hair out as to why wont
my banner DIV float to the right of my login box? It works fine in IE.
Any help...
|
by: =?Utf-8?B?Sm9obiBCYWlsZXk=?= |
last post by:
I have a ASP .Net page that allows moving around items on the page through
javascript. This page works fine in IE.
In FireFox however, I have found that if the page is using XHTML 1.0...
|
by: calebih |
last post by:
Here is the link in question:
http://www.redchip.com/testing.asp
It is simply styled with floating divs.
Two floating divs are in a container, and they look fine, until I
insert dropdown...
|
by: ottawamom |
last post by:
Hi there,
simply.amandadevries.com/index.html
The page validates fine. Yes I know I'm using a table where I
shouldn't but I can't otherwise figure out how to get my little image
for the list...
|
by: DolphinDB |
last post by:
Tired of spending countless mintues downsampling your data? Look no further!
In this article, you’ll learn how to efficiently downsample 6.48 billion high-frequency records to 61 million...
|
by: ryjfgjl |
last post by:
ExcelToDatabase: batch import excel into database automatically...
|
by: isladogs |
last post by:
The next Access Europe meeting will be on Wednesday 6 Mar 2024 starting at 18:00 UK time (6PM UTC) and finishing at about 19:15 (7.15PM).
In this month's session, we are pleased to welcome back...
|
by: isladogs |
last post by:
The next Access Europe meeting will be on Wednesday 6 Mar 2024 starting at 18:00 UK time (6PM UTC) and finishing at about 19:15 (7.15PM).
In this month's session, we are pleased to welcome back...
|
by: ArrayDB |
last post by:
The error message I've encountered is; ERROR:root:Error generating model response: exception: access violation writing 0x0000000000005140, which seems to be indicative of an access violation...
|
by: PapaRatzi |
last post by:
Hello,
I am teaching myself MS Access forms design and Visual Basic. I've created a table to capture a list of Top 30 singles and forms to capture new entries. The final step is a form (unbound)...
|
by: CloudSolutions |
last post by:
Introduction:
For many beginners and individual users, requiring a credit card and email registration may pose a barrier when starting to use cloud servers. However, some cloud server providers now...
|
by: Shællîpôpï 09 |
last post by:
If u are using a keypad phone, how do u turn on JavaScript, to access features like WhatsApp, Facebook, Instagram....
|
by: isladogs |
last post by:
The next Access Europe User Group meeting will be on Wednesday 3 Apr 2024 starting at 18:00 UK time (6PM UTC+1) and finishing by 19:30 (7.30PM).
In this session, we are pleased to welcome former...
| |