rhino wrote:
I've been looking at the information on Structured Types in the
certifcation guide and have previously read it in the DB2 manuals. As neat
as Structured Types are, I'm very curious to know if they are being
heavily used in the real world? Or are they just a "nice to have" feature
that no one actually uses?
I'm also curious to know if anyone is finding them dramatically better
than regular tables? If so, WHY are they finding the structured types so
good?
I think Serge already summed it up quite nicely. As a bit of background
information on the DB2 Spatial Extender: structured types were used in this
product to provide encapsulation for different pieces of geometries and
also to tie special spatial indexing mechanisms. (The indexing questions
could be solved in different ways, too.) Internally, the spatial data
types contain a BLOB in which all the geometry data is encoded.
I consider one thing as a really nice feature for structured types: if you
wrap a BLOB/CLOB into such a type, you can exploit the buffer pools for
small LOBs while really large objects are treated as always.
--
Knut Stolze
DB2 z/OS Utilities Development
IBM Germany