On Mon, 25 Jun 2007 17:58:10 +0000, Troels Arvin scribbled:
On Sun, 24 Jun 2007 19:33:39 +0000, I wrote:
>I generally try to use INSERT instead of LOAD whenever feasible. I've
seen LOAD result in rather nasty need-to-involve-the-DBA-and-even-
sometimes-IBM-support situations because of LOAD operations that
failed.
I meant to write "IMPORT" (not INSERT).
FYI - I've only seen what you describe with LOAD in situations where the
database is set up to use archived logging. With circular logging, I've
always found LOAD to be perfectly reliable (although a few SET INTEGRITY
calls may be required afterward, if foreign keys are defined).
Admittedly, circular logging has several limitations (no online backup,
no rollforward recovery, etc.) and certainly isn't suitable for many
installations - but if it is used, LOAD should be seriously considered as
an alternative to IMPORT.
Cheers,
Dave.