467,882 Members | 1,229 Online
Bytes | Developer Community
New Post

Home Posts Topics Members FAQ

Post your question to a community of 467,882 developers. It's quick & easy.

Just for laughs..

Hi,

some developers seem to have a good sense of humor. The following
was found after (stupid enough) restoring a DB created with FP9a on a
FP8 test-system (DIAGLEVEL=4):

2006-03-17-13.13.47.909513+060 I54072G437 LEVEL: Info
PID : 22929 TID : 1024 PROC : db2agent (TEST)
INSTANCE: db2inst1 NODE : 000 DB : TEST
APPHDL : 0-300 APPID: XXXXXXXX.XXXX.XXXXXXXXXXXX
FUNCTION: DB2 UDB, access plan manager, sqlra_compile_var, probe:20
RETCODE : ZRC=0x80310004=-2144272380=SQLNN_E_NFOUND
"did not find specified thing in whatever"

Not too bad. It finally led me to the initial mistake AND gave me a
refreshing laugh. Thank you guys! ;-)

tcb,

Norbert
Mar 20 '06 #1
  • viewed: 1577
Share:
3 Replies
Norbert Munkel wrote:
Hi,

some developers seem to have a good sense of humor. The following
was found after (stupid enough) restoring a DB created with FP9a on a
FP8 test-system (DIAGLEVEL=4):

2006-03-17-13.13.47.909513+060 I54072G437 LEVEL: Info
PID : 22929 TID : 1024 PROC : db2agent (TEST)
INSTANCE: db2inst1 NODE : 000 DB : TEST
APPHDL : 0-300 APPID: XXXXXXXX.XXXX.XXXXXXXXXXXX
FUNCTION: DB2 UDB, access plan manager, sqlra_compile_var, probe:20
RETCODE : ZRC=0x80310004=-2144272380=SQLNN_E_NFOUND
"did not find specified thing in whatever"

Not too bad. It finally led me to the initial mistake AND gave me a
refreshing laugh. Thank you guys! ;-)

There you go.. And some people think we should clean these up and be
"more professional" *chuckle*

Presumable the SQLCODE -204 that goes with it filled in the blanks?

Cheers
Serge
--
Serge Rielau
DB2 Solutions Development
IBM Toronto Lab
Mar 20 '06 #2
Hi Serge,

Serge Rielau wrote:
"did not find specified thing in whatever"

Not too bad. It finally led me to the initial mistake AND gave me a
refreshing laugh. Thank you guys! ;-)


There you go.. And some people think we should clean these up and be
"more professional" *chuckle*

Presumable the SQLCODE -204 that goes with it filled in the blanks?


It did. And there was more _really_ usefull stuff in the db2diag.log as
well. But this particular one was just funny (but didn't came alone, as
you have mentioned)! ;-)

Regards,

Norbert
Mar 20 '06 #3
Ian
Norbert Munkel wrote:
Hi,

some developers seem to have a good sense of humor. The following
was found after (stupid enough) restoring a DB created with FP9a on a
FP8 test-system (DIAGLEVEL=4):

2006-03-17-13.13.47.909513+060 I54072G437 LEVEL: Info
PID : 22929 TID : 1024 PROC : db2agent (TEST)
INSTANCE: db2inst1 NODE : 000 DB : TEST
APPHDL : 0-300 APPID: XXXXXXXX.XXXX.XXXXXXXXXXXX
FUNCTION: DB2 UDB, access plan manager, sqlra_compile_var, probe:20
RETCODE : ZRC=0x80310004=-2144272380=SQLNN_E_NFOUND
"did not find specified thing in whatever"

Not too bad. It finally led me to the initial mistake AND gave me a
refreshing laugh. Thank you guys! ;-)


My favorite was the ZRC=0xDEADBEEF. That was back in V5 days, but it
always made me chuckle. :-)

Mar 20 '06 #4

This discussion thread is closed

Replies have been disabled for this discussion.

Similar topics

38 posts views Thread by Kevin Smith | last post: by
20 posts views Thread by kwikius | last post: by
30 posts views Thread by HangEveryRepubliKKKan | last post: by
By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.