By using this site, you agree to our updated Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Manage your Cookies Settings.
437,559 Members | 1,073 Online
Bytes IT Community
+ Ask a Question
Need help? Post your question and get tips & solutions from a community of 437,559 IT Pros & Developers. It's quick & easy.

Coding Standard for developing Stored Procedures

P: n/a
vj
Hi all ,

Please let me know if any of u know any links or documents which
provides any coding standards for developing DB2 Stored Procedures.

I am in effort of building a comprehensive document on Coding Standards
on Stored Procedures.

THanks ..
Sincerely Vijay.

Nov 12 '05 #1
Share this Question
Share on Google+
4 Replies


P: n/a
I think you can pick up these standards from various locations .. A
good reference is the IBM Press book on SPs. You will also find some
articles in the developer doamin on performance recommendations for SPs
which can also be made use of ..

HTH
Sathyaram

Nov 12 '05 #2

P: n/a
vj
Thanks . Let me search for them !!!

Nov 12 '05 #3

P: n/a

"vj" <vi***********@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:11**********************@g47g2000cwa.googlegr oups.com...
Hi all ,

Please let me know if any of u know any links or documents which
provides any coding standards for developing DB2 Stored Procedures.

I am in effort of building a comprehensive document on Coding Standards
on Stored Procedures.

THanks ..
Sincerely Vijay.


I don't recall if it contains any specific coding standards but there is a
lengthy, recent Redbook on the subject of stored procedures. You may want to
look through that to see if it has any recommendations. The publication
number is SG24-7083. This URL -
<http://www.redbooks.ibm.com/abstracts/sg247083.html?Open> - should get you
to the abstract;
all you neeed to do is click on "Download PDF" or "View as HTML" to read the
document.

Rhino
Nov 12 '05 #4

P: n/a
vj
Thats an excellent link !!
Do send me more once , if u come across any .
Thanks

Nov 12 '05 #5

This discussion thread is closed

Replies have been disabled for this discussion.