Raw DMS single- vs. multi-table tablespaces
I am looking for info re recommendations and performance comparisons of
single vs. multiple table allocations in raw DMS tablespaces. While it
seems logical that it would be more efficient to allocate one table per
tablespace, the convenience of putting multiple tables into a single
tablespace certainly does have a certain appeal. The question is - what
will that do to performance?
My question has to do with RAW DMS only.
Any user experiences and informed opinions will also be appreciated.
Thx
Ge**@SuperKuper.com
