Greg
There are several options available for Disater Recovery:
Method
Pros
Cons
Transport of database backups
Low cost
Recovery to time of last backup
Lose all transactions since last backup
Transport of database backups and archived logs (physical/network)
Recovery to time of last archived log
Low cost
Lose all transactions in the active logs
Longer recovery time (database restore followed by roll-forward
through all the logs)
Standby Database via Log Shipping
Support for no transaction loss
Minimal impact to production system
Standby not available for use while in Rollforward mode
Standby needs to be physically and logically identical
Some administrative actions not reflected on standby (eg. NOT LOGGED
operations)
Standby Database via Replication
Can read (and write) standby
Standby need not be physically and logically identical
Can choose to replicate only critical tables
Transaction loss a possibility
Extra cycles on production database for transaction capture
Some administrative actions not reflected on standby (eg. NOT LOGGED
operations)
Synchronous mirroring of all data and log disks
No transaction loss
All changes to the database (including administrative) are replicated
Shortest restart time
Performance impact of synchronous mirroring to a geographically remote
site
High price (software/hardware/network)
I would also check out the up and coming release of DB2 UDB called Stringer:
http://www-306.ibm.com/software/data/db2/stinger/
Dale McInnis
"GB" <bo********@bigfoot.com> wrote in message
news:40********@news.deckpoint.ch...
Hi,
I'm trying to find an easy, efficient and safe site-to-site
backup/failover solution.
The idea is to have anytime a remote copy of 99.99% of the data.
Productive db -> VPN (internet) -> Backup site
source destination
Replication:
Slows down productive db
Quite difficult to invert the replication, backup site cannot go live
then back to the normal (backup) state again
Log shipping:
Quite a lot of data can be lost since the logfile size cannot always be
reduced
Has someone here some good or bad experiences doing this ?
Any ideas about bandwidth usage ?
Thanks, Greg