Bob Jones wrote:
"Matthew Dauphinee" <md********@performics.com> wrote in message
news:41**************************@posting.google.c om...
Blair,
That makes complete sense to me, but our management isn't very
interested in 64 bit computing yet. Painful.
Well if anyone else is seeing upwards of 3.5GB bufferpools on 32 bit
Intel machines running LINUX, I'd like to hear about it.
Matt
We run DB2 on Red Hat AS 2.1. The maximum buffer pool size per instance is
slightly less than 2G. That's sufficient for most databases. You can always
configure extended storage, if you need more.
I have not used AS 3.0. Maybe the limit has been increased in this release.
I have ES 3.0, but do not have DB2 installed (I have only DB2 V6.1, and
I know I will have real dependency problems with it were I to try). When
I read Red Hat stuff, I infer that each process should be able to access
3.7 to 3.8 GBytes provided you have enough real memory and a chipset
(e.g., Intel E7501) to support it.
https://www.redhat.com/apps/WebForm/...paperfinal.pdf
implies it, but this link may require registration to see it.
--
.~. Jean-David Beyer Registered Linux User 85642.
/V\ Registered Machine 241939.
/( )\ Shrewsbury, New Jersey
http://counter.li.org
^^-^^ 22:30:00 up 6 days, 18:45, 2 users, load average: 4.10, 4.06, 4.01