setsockopt in windows

[asit]

In my code I have to convert the following UNIX code to its winsock
equivalent code...

if(setsockopt(sockfd, SOL_SOCKET, SO_REUSEADDR, &yes, sizeof(int)) ==
-1)
{
perror("setsockopt error");
}

In the above code perror is not an issue. But how to fix setsockopt()
function !!!!!

[Ian Collins]

asit wrote:

In my code I have to convert the following UNIX code to its winsock
equivalent code...

if(setsockopt(sockfd, SOL_SOCKET, SO_REUSEADDR, &yes, sizeof(int)) ==
-1)
{
perror("setsockopt error");
}

In the above code perror is not an issue. But how to fix setsockopt()
function !!!!!

Have you tried searching for "setsockopt winsock"?

Failing that, a windows programming group would be a good place to ask.

--
Ian Collins.

[CBFalconer]

asit wrote:

>
In my code I have to convert the following UNIX code to its winsock
equivalent code...

if(setsockopt(sockfd, SOL_SOCKET, SO_REUSEADDR, &yes, sizeof(int))
== -1)
{
perror("setsockopt error");
}

In the above code perror is not an issue. But how to fix setsockopt()
function !!!!!

There is no such function in standard C. This is off-topic on
c.l.c. Find a newsgroup that deals with your system, which appears
to be Windows. The result will not be portable.

--
[mail]: Chuck F (cbfalconer at maineline dot net)
[page]: <http://cbfalconer.home.att.net>
Try the download section.

[Ian Collins]

CBFalconer wrote:

asit wrote:

>In my code I have to convert the following UNIX code to its winsock
equivalent code...

if(setsockopt(sockfd, SOL_SOCKET, SO_REUSEADDR, &yes, sizeof(int))
== -1)
{
perror("setsockopt error");
}

In the above code perror is not an issue. But how to fix setsockopt()
function !!!!!

There is no such function in standard C. This is off-topic on
c.l.c. Find a newsgroup that deals with your system, which appears
to be Windows. The result will not be portable.

Didn't I say that (in a more friendly manner) over 12 hours ago?

--
Ian Collins.

[Antoninus Twink]

On 6 Oct 2008 at 21:44, Ian Collins wrote:

CBFalconer wrote:

[the usual]

Didn't I say that (in a more friendly manner) over 12 hours ago?

Since when did that ever stop CBF making a nuisance of himself?

[CBFalconer]

Ian Collins wrote:

CBFalconer wrote:

>asit wrote:

>>In my code I have to convert the following UNIX code to its
winsock equivalent code...

if(setsockopt(sockfd, SOL_SOCKET, SO_REUSEADDR, &yes, sizeof(int))
== -1)
{
perror("setsockopt error");
}

In the above code perror is not an issue. But how to fix
setsockopt() function !!!!!

There is no such function in standard C. This is off-topic on
c.l.c. Find a newsgroup that deals with your system, which appears
to be Windows. The result will not be portable.

Didn't I say that (in a more friendly manner) over 12 hours ago?

Yes, but not on my screen before I read and answered. Besides,
your answer left topicality somewhat in doubt (IMO).

--
[mail]: Chuck F (cbfalconer at maineline dot net)
[page]: <http://cbfalconer.home.att.net>
Try the download section.

[Ian Collins]

CBFalconer wrote:

Ian Collins wrote:

>Didn't I say that (in a more friendly manner) over 12 hours ago?

Yes, but not on my screen before I read and answered. Besides,
your answer left topicality somewhat in doubt (IMO).

You could save your self a lot of time by reading ahead before replying.
A threading newsreader would also help.

--
Ian Collins.

[Peter Nilsson]

Ian Collins <[e-mail]:

CBFalconer wrote:

There is no such function in standard C. ...

Didn't I say that ... over 12 hours ago?

Not the first bit, no.

--
Peter