Bedbugs or Fireants

[C++ Developer]

I posted a couple pages on bedbugs and fire ants for heling out with these
new scourges.

--
Bedbugs? -http://vegan.dyndns.biz

[David Segall]

"C++ Developer" <ro***@rabbit.comwrote:

>I posted a couple pages on bedbugs and fire ants for heling out with these
new scourges.

Isn't there some conflict between advocating a vegan lifestyle and
pouring boiling water on ants?

And, while I'm being picky, is that your real email address? If not,
consider the nice people at rabbit.com who are selling microcomputers
and should not have to deal with email spam addressed to you. RFC2606
<http://www.rfc-archive.org/getrfc.php?rfc=2606has something
appropriate.

[Developer]

Considering it took a couple of days to sift through usenet, I refuse to let
my email address be harvested that easily. My aproaches are more
comprehensive, and I don't know any vegans who adore bedbugs. Pests are
pests, plain and simple. The site has many solutions. Choose one that suits
your needs.

Repeat after me, "death to bedbugs".

--
Bedbugs? -http://vegan.dyndns.biz
"David Segall" <da***@address.invalidwrote in message
news:d5********************************@4ax.com...

"C++ Developer" <ro***@rabbit.comwrote:

>>I posted a couple pages on bedbugs and fire ants for heling out with these
new scourges.

Isn't there some conflict between advocating a vegan lifestyle and
pouring boiling water on ants?

And, while I'm being picky, is that your real email address? If not,
consider the nice people at rabbit.com who are selling microcomputers
and should not have to deal with email spam addressed to you. RFC2606
<http://www.rfc-archive.org/getrfc.php?rfc=2606has something
appropriate.

[David Segall]

"Developer" <ro***@rabbit.comwrote:

>Considering it took a couple of days to sift through usenet, I refuse to let
my email address be harvested that easily.

I am not suggesting that you publish your real email address. The
email address you are using is directing spam intended for you to some
total strangers who have done you no harm. Change your published email
address to, say, ro***@rabbit.invalid as advised in RFC2606 and spare
yourself and the people at rabbit.com from spam.

[CBFalconer]

Developer wrote:

>
Considering it took a couple of days to sift through usenet, I
refuse to let my email address be harvested that easily. My
aproaches are more comprehensive, and I don't know any vegans who
adore bedbugs. Pests are pests, plain and simple. The site has
many solutions. Choose one that suits your needs.

Repeat after me, "death to bedbugs".

Please do not top-post. Your answer belongs after (or intermixed
with) the quoted material to which you reply, after snipping all
irrelevant material. See the following links:

<http://www.catb.org/~esr/faqs/smart-questions.html>
<http://www.caliburn.nl/topposting.html>
<http://www.netmeister.org/news/learn2quote.html>
<http://cfaj.freeshell.org/google/ (taming google)
<http://members.fortunecity.com/nnqweb/ (newusers)

F'ups set to eliminate c.l.c. Off topic there.

--
[mail]: Chuck F (cbfalconer at maineline dot net)
[page]: <http://cbfalconer.home.att.net>
Try the download section.

[Keith Thompson]

CBFalconer <cb********@yahoo.comwrites:
[...]

>Repeat after me, "death to bedbugs".

Please do not top-post. Your answer belongs after (or intermixed
with) the quoted material to which you reply, after snipping all
irrelevant material. See the following links:

[...]

Who cares whether a spammer top-posts?

--
Keith Thompson (The_Other_Keith) ks***@mib.org <http://www.ghoti.net/~kst>
Nokia
"We must do something. This is something. Therefore, we must do this."
-- Antony Jay and Jonathan Lynn, "Yes Minister"

[Kenny McCormack]

In article <ln************@nuthaus.mib.org>,
Keith Thompson <ks***@mib.orgwrote:

>CBFalconer <cb********@yahoo.comwrites:
[...]

>>Repeat after me, "death to bedbugs".

Please do not top-post. Your answer belongs after (or intermixed
with) the quoted material to which you reply, after snipping all
irrelevant material. See the following links:

[...]

Who cares whether a spammer top-posts?

Obviously, CBF & the Loser, do.

[Richard]

Keith Thompson <ks***@mib.orgwrites:

CBFalconer <cb********@yahoo.comwrites:
[...]

>>Repeat after me, "death to bedbugs".

Please do not top-post. Your answer belongs after (or intermixed
with) the quoted material to which you reply, after snipping all
irrelevant material. See the following links:

[...]

Who cares whether a spammer top-posts?

"Chuck" apparently.

I find it amazing that he thinks his off topic net nannying IS on topic
whereas someone else's isn't. I am beginning to wonder if he is possibly
the biggest arse to post to a technical group in the history of Usenet.