Re: Ten C++ Parogramming ebook

[CBFalconer]

Eligiusz Narutowicz wrote:

santosh <sa*********@gmail.comwrites:

.... snip ...

>

>Any expression of such condemnation would not be topical here.
It's better done through a private mail to the OP.

Are you sure you are not he moderator here? More tellings off
than I can count. Why is it ok for you to reply OT but not for
the other people?

FYI, discussion of topicality is always topical.

--
[mail]: Chuck F (cbfalconer at maineline dot net)
[page]: <http://cbfalconer.home.att.net>
Try the download section.

** Posted from http://www.teranews.com **

[Joachim Schmitz]

CBFalconer wrote:

Eligiusz Narutowicz wrote:

>santosh <sa*********@gmail.comwrites:

... snip ...

>>

>>Any expression of such condemnation would not be topical here.
It's better done through a private mail to the OP.

Are you sure you are not he moderator here? More tellings off
than I can count. Why is it ok for you to reply OT but not for
the other people?

FYI, discussion of topicality is always topical.

Replys to spam never are.

[Eligiusz Narutowicz]

"Joachim Schmitz" <no*********@schmitz-digital.dewrites:

CBFalconer wrote:

>Eligiusz Narutowicz wrote:

>>santosh <sa*********@gmail.comwrites:

... snip ...

>>>
Any expression of such condemnation would not be topical here.
It's better done through a private mail to the OP.

Are you sure you are not he moderator here? More tellings off
than I can count. Why is it ok for you to reply OT but not for
the other people?

FYI, discussion of topicality is always topical.

Replys to spam never are.

I am a little confused now. Santosh and CBFalconer are the same person I
think? All they seem to do is to telling people off for what they are
seeing as topic issues.

[Joachim Schmitz]

Eligiusz Narutowicz wrote:

"Joachim Schmitz" <no*********@schmitz-digital.dewrites:

<snip>

I am a little confused now. Santosh and CBFalconer are the same
person I think?

I don't believe that.

Bye, Jojo

[CBFalconer]

Joachim Schmitz wrote:

Eligiusz Narutowicz wrote:

<snip>

>I am a little confused now. Santosh and CBFalconer are the same
person I think?

I don't believe that.

Nor do I :-)

--
[mail]: Chuck F (cbfalconer at maineline dot net)
[page]: <http://cbfalconer.home.att.net>
Try the download section.
** Posted from http://www.teranews.com **

[Richard Heathfield]

Joachim Schmitz said:

Eligiusz Narutowicz wrote:

>"Joachim Schmitz" <no*********@schmitz-digital.dewrites:

<snip>

>I am a little confused now. Santosh and CBFalconer are the same
person I think?

I don't believe that.

Neither do I - but I'm not surprised that Mr Narutowicz believes it. Some
people have seriously difficulty in accepting that more than one person
might disagree with them, which is why these ludicrous allegations of
sockpuppetry crop up from time to time.

The difference in writing style between Santosh (or rather, "santosh", for
he invariably eschews the capital) and CBFalconer is significant, and each
is internally very consistent. If this is one person posting under both
nicks, he's either extremely clever, patient, and careful or very, very
unwell indeed. The simplest explanation consistent with the facts is that
the two identities genuinely belong to different people.

--
Richard Heathfield <http://www.cpax.org.uk>
Email: -http://www. +rjh@
Google users: <http://www.cpax.org.uk/prg/writings/googly.php>
"Usenet is a strange place" - dmr 29 July 1999