469,934 Members | 2,019 Online
Bytes | Developer Community
New Post

Home Posts Topics Members FAQ

Post your question to a community of 469,934 developers. It's quick & easy.

U++ problem (was: counting words)

This is specifically regarding U++ which is C++ libraries and IDE
(please don't whine whether its on or off topic. Right click on the
thread and click on ignore instead of wasting time).

This is specifically for Mirek Fidler. I am on a new computer (with
Vista instead of XP, 3 gig ram, and 3 core phenom). I downloaded U++
IDE (with mingw). Compiled the counting words benchmark (with MINGW
speed option) and it was much slower than before (2000ms instead of
800-1000 ms on the older comp). I also noticed that the version of g++
bundled with the IDE now is 3.4.2 (mingw-special) (instead of 3.4.0).

Also, I can't make U++ work with MSC9. On the older XP, it worked fine
without any problem. (In fact, MSC9 was automatically the default
compiler and produced faster code than mingw).

Jun 27 '08 #1
17 1412
On 2008-04-30 02:52:16 -0400, Razii <wh**********@hotmail.comsaid:
This is specifically regarding U++ which is C++ libraries and IDE
(please don't whine whether its on or off topic. Right click on the
thread and click on ignore instead of wasting time).
This is even easier:

plonk

--
Pete
Roundhouse Consulting, Ltd. (www.versatilecoding.com) Author of "The
Standard C++ Library Extensions: a Tutorial and Reference
(www.petebecker.com/tr1book)

Jun 27 '08 #2
On 30 Apr., 08:52, Razii <whatever1...@hotmail.comwrote:
[snip OT stuff]

This is not the appropriate NG for this. Find a better place.

/Peter
Jun 27 '08 #3
peter koch wrote:
On 30 Apr., 08:52, Razii <whatever1...@hotmail.comwrote:
[snip OT stuff]

This is not the appropriate NG for this. Find a better place.

/Peter
Stop feeding the trolls.
Jun 27 '08 #4
On 30 huhti, 09:52, Razii <whatever1...@hotmail.comwrote:
Vista instead of XP, 3 gig ram, and 3 core phenom). I downloaded U++
IDE (with mingw). Compiled the counting words benchmark (with MINGW
speed option) and it was much slower than before (2000ms instead of
800-1000 ms on the older comp). I also noticed that the version of g++
Get a life.
Jun 27 '08 #5
LR
Razii wrote:
This is specifically regarding U++ which is C++ libraries and IDE
(please don't whine whether its on or off topic. Right click on the
thread and click on ignore instead of wasting time).
[snip rest of off topic content]

Please refer to the faq for information on postings that are off topic
in comp.lang.c++.

http://www.parashift.com/c++-faq-lit...t.html#faq-5.9

Might I suggest that you search for a newsgroup or other forum for which
U++ is topical.

Perhaps you might find one here: http://www.ultimatepp.org/forum/

Please don't waste your time responding to this message. I find many of
your posts interesting, even useful, but your continued posting of off
topic material has led me to add a filter to my news reader. Please
consider this to be my loss.

Regretfully,

LR
Jun 27 '08 #6
Razii wrote:
This is specifically regarding U++ which is C++ libraries and IDE
(please don't whine whether its on or off topic. Right click on the
thread and click on ignore instead of wasting time).

This is specifically for Mirek Fidler. I am on a new computer (with
Vista instead of XP, 3 gig ram, and 3 core phenom). I downloaded U++
IDE (with mingw). Compiled the counting words benchmark (with MINGW
speed option) and it was much slower than before (2000ms instead of
800-1000 ms on the older comp). I also noticed that the version of g++
bundled with the IDE now is 3.4.2 (mingw-special) (instead of 3.4.0).

Also, I can't make U++ work with MSC9. On the older XP, it worked fine
without any problem. (In fact, MSC9 was automatically the default
compiler and produced faster code than mingw).
I won't whine or click ignore.

plonk

--
Jim Langston
ta*******@rocketmail.com
Jun 27 '08 #7
On Wed, 30 Apr 2008 06:54:42 -0700 (PDT), Krice <pa****@mbnet.fi>
wrote:
>Get a life.
... :)

Jun 27 '08 #8

Some nuts messed up my thread with whining, so I will create a new
one.

This is specifically regarding U++ which is C++ libraries and IDE
(please don't whine whether its on or off topic. Right click on the
thread and click on ignore instead of wasting MY time).

This is specifically for Mirek Fidler. I am on a new computer (with
Vista instead of XP, 3 gig ram, and 3 core phenom). I downloaded U++
IDE (with mingw). Compiled the counting words benchmark (with MINGW
speed option) and it was much slower than before (2000ms instead of
800-1000 ms on the older comp). I also noticed that the version of g++
bundled with the IDE now is 3.4.2 (mingw-special) (instead of 3.4.0).

Also, I can't make U++ work with MSC9. On the older XP, it worked fine
without any problem. (In fact, MSC9 was automatically the default
compiler and produced faster code than mingw).
Jun 27 '08 #9
On Wed, 30 Apr 2008 11:03:18 -0400, LR <lr***@superlink.netwrote:
>Please refer to the faq for information on postings that are off topic
in comp.lang.c++.
Why don't you stick up where sun doesn't shine, moron? Didn't I tell
you to not waste my time with posting nonsense?


Jun 27 '08 #10
On Wed, 30 Apr 2008 06:54:27 -0400, Pete Becker
<pe**@versatilecoding.comwrote:
>This is even easier:
You should know that if I wanted, I can setup a bot that will post
with a different USENET server and different email everyday the same
post (like I did here), both here and to c++.moderated with approved
tag added, until you learn not to whine and stink my threads with
nonsense.
Jun 27 '08 #11
On 2008-04-30 17:08:57 -0400, Razi <kj******@hotmail.comsaid:
On Wed, 30 Apr 2008 06:54:27 -0400, Pete Becker
<pe**@versatilecoding.comwrote:
>This is even easier:

You should know that if I wanted, I can setup a bot that will post
with a different USENET server and different email everyday the same
post (like I did here), both here and to c++.moderated with approved
tag added, until you learn not to whine and stink my threads with
nonsense.
plonk.

--
Pete
Roundhouse Consulting, Ltd. (www.versatilecoding.com) Author of "The
Standard C++ Library Extensions: a Tutorial and Reference
(www.petebecker.com/tr1book)

Jun 27 '08 #12
Razii wrote:
Some nuts messed up my thread with whining, so I will create a new
one.
[redacted]
This is still off-topic.

Please see the FAQ, in particular, FAQ 5.9

http://www.parashift.com/c++-faq-lit...t.html#faq-5.9
Jun 27 '08 #13
On Wed, 30 Apr 2008 17:35:53 -0400, Pete Becker
<pe**@versatilecoding.comwrote:
>plonk.
This is really fun. Try plonking this email and USETNET server too
(see headers). I am thinking of adding c++.moderated to the list with
my own approved header, just for fun. I will setup a bot that will
post with random USENET servers and random emails here and to
c++.moderated, and you setup a bot that says plonk. Then we will have
our bots doing the war.

How about it? Want to play?

Jun 27 '08 #14
On Wed, 30 Apr 2008 21:54:40 GMT, red floyd <no*****@here.dudewrote:
>Please see the FAQ, in particular, FAQ 5.9

http://www.parashift.com/c++-faq-lit...t.html#faq-5.9
Argh!. When will you learn that this is USENET. You should create your
own email list where you can have rules and authority. The guy who
wrote the FAQ doesn't own this group more than I do.

I am starting to think that you guys enjoy trolling by posting
nonsense like you did above. Most of you are very well trained trolls,
indeed. No doubt.

Do you know that there are some USENET server admins who don't even
recognize moderated groups because they think it's censorship? I know
this from experience. Years ago I used to moderate a
religious/anti-religious debate newsgroup. A troll, unhappy that I
rejected his post, started posting by using fake approved header. Was
there anything I could do to stop him? Absolutely not. His server
admin (and he was using a pay server to post) claimed that it was not
abuse to post by adding approved tag if the post is not spam or not
impersonating someone else.

Even moderated group means nothing on USENET. All it can do is block
spam since most of these spam bots don't add approved header.

Jun 27 '08 #15
On Thu, 01 May 2008 00:10:43 +0200, "Alf P. Steinbach"
<al***@start.nowrote:
>If you start forging approved-headers we will at the very least have to report
you to abuse at your ISP (RoadRunner, your current IP address is 75.87.86.76).
Ah, if I do something like that, I won't be using roadruner. You can
use a server that don't even forward IP address. There are some server
admins who claim posting anonymously is a fundamental right.
>You have been plonked twice by the secretary of the international C++
standardization committee's library group.
I remember Pete Becker troll real well when I used to post here years
ago. This troll, Pete Becker, posted a java benchmark (off topic,
huh?) and implied that IO in java is 40/50 times slower than C++. He
was wrong, of course.

Jun 27 '08 #16
On 30 huhti, 23:41, Razii <whatever1...@hotmail.comwrote:
Get a life.
.. :)
You are wasting your time when trying to think which language
is "better" or faster. There is no such thing as better language,
otherwise we would all be using it. You are talking about Java
in C++ group, it's off topic. Besides no one will believe you,
because you are wrong. But then you probably know that and just
want some attention. Don't be so hard on yourself, we all want
same things. We are all connected through astral planes. You
are not alone.
Jun 27 '08 #17
On 1 touko, 10:56, Razii <jlgh...@hotmail.comwrote:
If you explain that one, I would leave the group.
No you will not. And I already explained, you just don't
want to listen. You need to improve your understanding.
It's now in the level of an ape or slightly below that.
Jun 27 '08 #18

This discussion thread is closed

Replies have been disabled for this discussion.

Similar topics

10 posts views Thread by Andrew Dalke | last post: by
34 posts views Thread by Ville Voipio | last post: by
3 posts views Thread by arnuld | last post: by
19 posts views Thread by arnuld | last post: by
By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.