Buying the ISO 14882-2003 Standard

[ManicQin]

Hi,
I was about to buy the Standard but then I found this link
http://www.usatlas.bnl.gov/~dladams/...14882-2003.pdf

Hmmmm... ... The link seems legit so ... what gives?

Thanks...

[red floyd]

ManicQin wrote:

Hi,
I was about to buy the Standard but then I found this link
http://www.usatlas.bnl.gov/~dladams/...14882-2003.pdf

Hmmmm... ... The link seems legit so ... what gives?

Somebody accidentally (or ignorantly) made it available. It is not
"free" in either the $$$ or GPL sense of the word.

[ManicQin]

On Apr 24, 1:56*am, red floyd <[e-mail]:

ManicQin wrote:

Hi,
I was about to buy the Standard but then I found this link
http://www.usatlas.bnl.gov/~dladams/...14882-2003.pdf

Hmmmm... ... The link seems legit so ... what gives?

Somebody accidentally (or ignorantly) made it available. *It is not
"free" in either the $$$ or GPL sense of the word.

Which rises a very (very very) ethical question...

[Juha Nieminen]

ManicQin wrote:

On Apr 24, 1:56 am, red floyd <[e-mail]:

>ManicQin wrote:

>>Hi,
I was about to buy the Standard but then I found this link
http://www.usatlas.bnl.gov/~dladams/...14882-2003.pdf
Hmmmm... ... The link seems legit so ... what gives?

Somebody accidentally (or ignorantly) made it available. It is not
"free" in either the $$$ or GPL sense of the word.

Which rises a very (very very) ethical question...

Is that ethical question "why should an international standard be
commercial in the first place"?

[hurcan solter]

On Wed, 23 Apr 2008 15:26:29 -0700 (PDT), ManicQin
<Ma******@gmail.comwrote:

>Hi,
I was about to buy the Standard but then I found this link
http://www.usatlas.bnl.gov/~dladams/...14882-2003.pdf

Hmmmm... ... The link seems legit so ... what gives?

Thanks...

I use working drafts from
http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg...s/papers/2008/

Non-existent section in c++03

14.5.3 Variadic templates [temp.variadic]

1 A template parameter pack is a template parameter that accepts zero
or more template arguments. [ Example:

template<class ... Typesstruct Tuple { };

Tuple<t0; // Types contains no arguments
Tuple<intt1; // Types contains one argument: int
Tuple<int, floatt2; // Types contains two arguments: int and float
Tuple<0eror; // error: 0 is not a type

—end example ]

this is bleeding edge c++ for you !!

[subramanian100in]

Is ISO 2003 C++ standardized as C++98, or, is ISO C++ 2003 is a draft
proposal ?

What is the latest ISO C++ STANDARDIZED version that has been
published? (Somewhere I read C++0x; but I am not sure)

Kindly reply

Thanks
V.Subramanian

[red floyd]

su**************@yahoo.com, India wrote:

Is ISO 2003 C++ standardized as C++98, or, is ISO C++ 2003 is a draft
proposal ?

What is the latest ISO C++ STANDARDIZED version that has been
published? (Somewhere I read C++0x; but I am not sure)

2003 is the latest official standard. It incorporated TC1 (technical
corrigendum 1). I believe it's minor edits and clarifications.

[ManicQin]

On Apr 24, 2:24 am, Juha Nieminen <[e-mail]:

ManicQin wrote:

On Apr 24, 1:56 am, red floyd <[e-mail]:

ManicQin wrote:
Hi,
I was about to buy the Standard but then I found this link
http://www.usatlas.bnl.gov/~dladams/...14882-2003.pdf
Hmmmm... ... The link seems legit so ... what gives?
Somebody accidentally (or ignorantly) made it available. It is not
"free" in either the $$$ or GPL sense of the word.

Which rises a very (very very) ethical question...

Is that ethical question "why should an international standard be
commercial in the first place"?

I think that they should be rewarded for they're effort. No?
Besides its a symbol of status, Rappers have Bling Blings and we've
got STD ;)

[subramanian100in]

On Apr 24, 2:07 am, red floyd <[e-mail]:

[e-mail], India wrote:

Is ISO 2003 C++ standardized as C++98, or, is ISO C++ 2003 is a draft
proposal ?

What is the latest ISO C++ STANDARDIZED version that has been
published? (Somewhere I read C++0x; but I am not sure)

2003 is the latest official standard. It incorporated TC1 (technical
corrigendum 1). I believe it's minor edits and clarifications.

My question is: is ISO 2003 C++ standard a draft proposal or the final
version. I am using g++ 3.4.3 version which supports only C++98. Are
there compilers which support ISO 2003 C++ standard if it is final
standard(that is, it is not a draft proposal) ?

Kindly clarify.

Thanks
V.Subramanian

[Victor Bazarov]

su**************@yahoo.com wrote:

On Apr 24, 2:07 am, red floyd <[e-mail]:

>[e-mail], India wrote:

>>Is ISO 2003 C++ standardized as C++98, or, is ISO C++ 2003 is a
draft proposal ?

>>What is the latest ISO C++ STANDARDIZED version that has been
published? (Somewhere I read C++0x; but I am not sure)

2003 is the latest official standard. It incorporated TC1 (technical
corrigendum 1). I believe it's minor edits and clarifications.

My question is: is ISO 2003 C++ standard a draft proposal or the final
version.

Say, what in "2003 is the latest official standard" do you not understand?
Which word in that statement confuses you? The "latest" or the "official"?

I am using g++ 3.4.3 version which supports only C++98. Are
there compilers which support ISO 2003 C++ standard if it is final
standard(that is, it is not a draft proposal) ?

Kindly clarify.

Kindly reread red floyd's reply.

>
Thanks
V.Subramanian

V
--
Please remove capital 'A's when replying by e-mail
I do not respond to top-posted replies, please don't ask

[subramanian100in]

On Apr 24, 10:01 am, "Victor Bazarov" <[e-mail]:

[e-mail] wrote:

On Apr 24, 2:07 am, red floyd <[e-mail]:

[e-mail], India wrote:
Is ISO 2003 C++ standardized as C++98, or, is ISO C++ 2003 is a
draft proposal ?

>What is the latest ISO C++ STANDARDIZED version that has been
published? (Somewhere I read C++0x; but I am not sure)

2003 is the latest official standard. It incorporated TC1 (technical
corrigendum 1). I believe it's minor edits and clarifications.

My question is: is ISO 2003 C++ standard a draft proposal or the final
version.

Say, what in "2003 is the latest official standard" do you not understand?
Which word in that statement confuses you? The "latest" or the "official"?

I am using g++ 3.4.3 version which supports only C++98. Are
there compilers which support ISO 2003 C++ standard if it is final
standard(that is, it is not a draft proposal) ?

Kindly clarify.

Kindly reread red floyd's reply.

Thanks
V.Subramanian

V
--
Please remove capital 'A's when replying by e-mail
I do not respond to top-posted replies, please don't ask

I get it now. C++98 plus Technical Corrigendum 1 is ISO 2003. Am I
correct.

I am reading TC++PL 3rd edition by Stroustrup which was published
before ISO C++ 2003. Is it sufficient ?. I request you to suggest some
books which are compliant with ISO C++ 2003 which I can read. Also is
there a g++ compiler which is ISO C++ 2003 compliant.

Has Stroustrup written any book on ISO C++ 2003 ?

Also please let me know the url for Technical Corrigendum 1 document
so that I can read it and update myself with the changes later that C+
+98.

Kindly help.

Thanks
V.Subramanian

[Victor Bazarov]

su**************@yahoo.com wrote:

[..]
I get it now. C++98 plus Technical Corrigendum 1 is ISO 2003. Am I
correct.

Is that a question.

I am reading TC++PL 3rd edition by Stroustrup which was published
before ISO C++ 2003. Is it sufficient ?.

Sufficient for what? It's the best book to learn the language AFAIC.

I request you to suggest some
books which are compliant with ISO C++ 2003 which I can read.

Books are never compliant. Compilers are compliant. You can read
a good C++ book and it will never mention what version of the C++
standard it's based on. Or never go into the details which are
in fact different in those standards. Look on www.accu.org for
C++ books that are "recommended" if you need a different good book
on C++.

Also is
there a g++ compiler which is ISO C++ 2003 compliant.

Ask in a g++ newsgroup, please.

Has Stroustrup written any book on ISO C++ 2003 ?

I don't think so.

Also please let me know the url for Technical Corrigendum 1 document
so that I can read it and update myself with the changes later that C+
+98.

I don't know where to find one. You could start by searching using
your favourite Web search engine.

V
--
Please remove capital 'A's when replying by e-mail
I do not respond to top-posted replies, please don't ask