Compiling:
template <class T = int>
T foo(const T& t)
{}
int main(int argc, char *argv[])
{}
gcc complains:
,----
| /Users/william/repo/helloworlds/foo.cpp:2: error: default template
| arguments may not be used in function templates
`----
But I find in "TC++PL(3rd, special edition)" P.340, Bjarne is giving
function templates with default template parameters as examples.
If current standard doesn't support it, what is the reason here?
--
William 6 3641
On 2008-06-01 16:29, William Xu wrote:
Compiling:
template <class T = int>
T foo(const T& t)
{}
int main(int argc, char *argv[])
{}
gcc complains:
,----
| /Users/william/repo/helloworlds/foo.cpp:2: error: default template
| arguments may not be used in function templates
`----
But I find in "TC++PL(3rd, special edition)" P.340, Bjarne is giving
function templates with default template parameters as examples.
If current standard doesn't support it, what is the reason here?
It is not supported in the current standard (14.1 §9), I do not know why.
--
Erik Wikström
Erik Wikström wrote:
On 2008-06-01 16:29, William Xu wrote:
>Compiling:
template <class T = int> T foo(const T& t) {}
int main(int argc, char *argv[]) {}
gcc complains:
,---- | /Users/william/repo/helloworlds/foo.cpp:2: error: default template | arguments may not be used in function templates `----
But I find in "TC++PL(3rd, special edition)" P.340, Bjarne is giving function templates with default template parameters as examples.
If current standard doesn't support it, what is the reason here?
It is not supported in the current standard (14.1 §9), I do not know why.
I wonder what difference one should expect from
template < typename T = int >
T foo ( T const & arg );
and
template < typename T >
T foo ( T const & arg );
How would you use the default type? The type T would be deduced from the
argument anyway, wouldn't it?
Best
Kai-Uwe Bux
Kai-Uwe Bux <jk********@gmx.netwrites:
How would you use the default type? The type T would be deduced from the
argument anyway, wouldn't it?
Consider the following example then. What if I want the default
comparision method to be Case_insensitive?
#include <iostream>
struct Case_insensitive
{
static bool eq(char c1, char c2) { return tolower(c1) == tolower(c2); }
};
struct Case_sensitive
{
static bool eq(char c1, char c2) { return c1 == c2; }
};
template <class Cmp>
bool eq(char c1, char c2)
{
return Cmp::eq(c1, c2);
}
int main(int argc, char *argv[])
{
char c1 = 'h', c2 = 'H';
/* These are okay. */
eq<Case_insensitive>(c1, c2) ;
eq<Case_sensitive>(c1, c2);
/* But how about this one ? */
/* eq(c1, c2); */
}
--
William http://williamxu.net9.org
You know what they say -- the sweetest word in the English language is revenge.
-- Peter Beard
William Xu wrote:
Kai-Uwe Bux <jk********@gmx.netwrites:
>How would you use the default type? The type T would be deduced from the argument anyway, wouldn't it?
Consider the following example then. What if I want the default
comparision method to be Case_insensitive?
#include <iostream>
struct Case_insensitive
{
static bool eq(char c1, char c2) { return tolower(c1) == tolower(c2); }
};
struct Case_sensitive
{
static bool eq(char c1, char c2) { return c1 == c2; }
};
template <class Cmp>
bool eq(char c1, char c2)
{
return Cmp::eq(c1, c2);
}
int main(int argc, char *argv[])
{
char c1 = 'h', c2 = 'H';
/* These are okay. */
eq<Case_insensitive>(c1, c2) ;
eq<Case_sensitive>(c1, c2);
/* But how about this one ? */
/* eq(c1, c2); */
}
Now, I can see your point.
On the other hand, it looks as though you want a default argument not a
default type:
#include <cctype>
bool case_insensitive ( char c1, char c2 ) {
return ( std::tolower(c1) == std::tolower(c2) );
}
bool case_sensitive ( char c1, char c2 ) {
return ( c1 == c2 );
}
typedef bool(* char_compare )(char,char);
bool eq ( char c1, char c2, char_compare comp = &case_sensitive ) {
return ( comp( c1, c2 ) );
}
int main ( void ) {
eq( 'c', 'h' );
}
Then again, I am not at all sure whether it is a good idea to have a default
in this case. I generally do not like magic hiding somewhere. Sooner or
later it is going to bite you. From that point of view, I prefer the
verbose version
eq< case_sensitive >( c1, c2 );
to
eq( c1, c2 );
Best
Kai-Uwe Bux
On Jun 1, 4:46 pm, Erik Wikström <Erik-wikst...@telia.comwrote:
On 2008-06-01 16:29, William Xu wrote:
Compiling:
template <class T = int>
T foo(const T& t)
{}
int main(int argc, char *argv[])
{}
gcc complains:
But I find in "TC++PL(3rd, special edition)" P.340, Bjarne
is giving function templates with default template
parameters as examples.
That surprises me a bit (but someone walked off with my copy of
the 3rd edition, so I can't verify it).
If current standard doesn't support it, what is the reason
here?
It is not supported in the current standard (14.1 §9), I do
not know why.
Probably because originally, function template arguments could
only be deduced, not explicitly specified, and a defauld
argument doesn't make sense in that case. For that matter,
given the original poster's example, when would the default
argument be used?
--
James Kanze (GABI Software) email:ja*********@gmail.com
Conseils en informatique orientée objet/
Beratung in objektorientierter Datenverarbeitung
9 place Sémard, 78210 St.-Cyr-l'École, France, +33 (0)1 30 23 00 34
"James Kanze" <ja*********@gmail.coma écrit dans le message de news: ff**********************************...oglegroups.com...
On Jun 1, 4:46 pm, Erik Wikström <Erik-wikst...@telia.comwrote:
On 2008-06-01 16:29, William Xu wrote:
Compiling:
template <class T = int>
T foo(const T& t)
{}
int main(int argc, char *argv[])
{}
gcc complains:
But I find in "TC++PL(3rd, special edition)" P.340, Bjarne
is giving function templates with default template
parameters as examples.
That surprises me a bit (but someone walked off with my copy of
the 3rd edition, so I can't verify it).
If current standard doesn't support it, what is the reason
here?
It is not supported in the current standard (14.1 §9), I do
not know why.
Probably because originally, function template arguments could
only be deduced, not explicitly specified, and a defauld
argument doesn't make sense in that case. For that matter,
given the original poster's example, when would the default
argument be used?
--
From C++ Templates (Vandevoorde, Josuttis)
"When templates were originally added to the C++ language, explicit function
template arguments were not a valid construct. [...] Since then, however, it
is possible to specify explicitle function template arguments that cannot be
deduced. "
So the following should compile...
template <typename T1, typename T2 = int>
T2 count (T1 const& x);
Cause T2 cannot be deduced since it is the return parameter. However I tried
with intel c++ 9.1 and VS 2003 compilers and they give me an error...
--------
Eric Pruneau This thread has been closed and replies have been disabled. Please start a new discussion. Similar topics
by: Michael Stembera |
last post by:
I would like to use default parameters in nested templates but MS VC++
7.1 chokes on it. Does anyone know how to fix the simple example
below or if indeed it is possible?
template <int N=7>...
|
by: nikola |
last post by:
Hi all,
I was working with a simple function template to find the min of two values.
But since I would like the two values to be different (type) I dont know
what kind of value (type) it will...
|
by: BRG |
last post by:
I know that default template arguments cannot be used in function
templates but are default function parameters legal?
That is, is this:
----------------------------------
#include <functional>...
|
by: WittyGuy |
last post by:
Hi,
What is the major difference between function overloading and function
templates?
Thanks!
http://www.gotw.ca/resources/clcm.htm for info about ]
|
by: Ian |
last post by:
The title says it all.
I can see the case where a function is to be called directly from C, the
name mangling will stuff this up.
But I can't see a reason why a template function can't be...
|
by: Jon Slaughter |
last post by:
#pragma once
#include <vector>
class empty_class
{
};
template <int _I, int _J, class _element, class _property>
class RDES_T
{
|
by: Dan Krantz |
last post by:
I have the following template to ensure that a given number (val) falls into
a range (between vmin & vmax):
template<typename T> T ForceNumericRange( const T& val, const T& vmin, const
T& vmax)...
|
by: Markus Svilans |
last post by:
Hello,
My question involves virtual functions and inheritance.
Suppose we have a class structure, that consists of "data" classes, and
"processor" classes. The data classes are derived from...
|
by: aaragon |
last post by:
Hi everyone,
I've been writing some code and so far I have all the code written in
the .h files in order to avoid the linker errors. I'm using templates.
I wanted to move the implementations to...
|
by: William Xu |
last post by:
Compiling:
template <class T = int>
T foo(const T& t)
{}
int main(int argc, char *argv)
{}
gcc complains:
|
by: Charles Arthur |
last post by:
How do i turn on java script on a villaon, callus and itel keypad mobile phone
|
by: emmanuelkatto |
last post by:
Hi All, I am Emmanuel katto from Uganda. I want to ask what challenges you've faced while migrating a website to cloud.
Please let me know.
Thanks!
Emmanuel
|
by: BarryA |
last post by:
What are the essential steps and strategies outlined in the Data Structures and Algorithms (DSA) roadmap for aspiring data scientists? How can individuals effectively utilize this roadmap to progress...
|
by: Sonnysonu |
last post by:
This is the data of csv file
1 2 3
1 2 3
1 2 3
1 2 3
2 3
2 3
3
the lengths should be different i have to store the data by column-wise with in the specific length.
suppose the i have to...
|
by: jinu1996 |
last post by:
In today's digital age, having a compelling online presence is paramount for businesses aiming to thrive in a competitive landscape. At the heart of this digital strategy lies an intricately woven...
|
by: Hystou |
last post by:
Overview:
Windows 11 and 10 have less user interface control over operating system update behaviour than previous versions of Windows. In Windows 11 and 10, there is no way to turn off the Windows...
|
by: tracyyun |
last post by:
Dear forum friends,
With the development of smart home technology, a variety of wireless communication protocols have appeared on the market, such as Zigbee, Z-Wave, Wi-Fi, Bluetooth, etc. Each...
|
by: agi2029 |
last post by:
Let's talk about the concept of autonomous AI software engineers and no-code agents. These AIs are designed to manage the entire lifecycle of a software development project—planning, coding, testing,...
|
by: isladogs |
last post by:
The next Access Europe User Group meeting will be on Wednesday 1 May 2024 starting at 18:00 UK time (6PM UTC+1) and finishing by 19:30 (7.30PM).
In this session, we are pleased to welcome a new...
| |