parse C source flow to extract program tree

[Crooter]

Hello colleagues,

Could anybody tell me if there are existing open-source solutions to
extract the program tree using a program source code? I'm aware that
GCC has program flow information and tree respectively for
optimization, but I'm looking for something less complicated.
An ideal case would be a small program based on a parser with YACC
compatible grammar which extracts the program flow tree.

Best regards,
C

[Joachim Schmitz]

Crooter wrote:

Hello colleagues,

Could anybody tell me if there are existing open-source solutions to
extract the program tree using a program source code? I'm aware that
GCC has program flow information and tree respectively for
optimization, but I'm looking for something less complicated.
An ideal case would be a small program based on a parser with YACC
compatible grammar which extracts the program flow tree.

Not really OT here (guess it'd be topical in comp.unix.programmer), but try
looking for cflow.

Bye, Jojo

[user923005]

On Jan 15, 6:26*am, Crooter <[e-mail]:

Hello colleagues,

Could anybody tell me if there are existing open-source solutions to
extract the program tree using a program source code? I'm aware that
GCC has program flow information and tree respectively for
optimization, but I'm looking for something less complicated.
An ideal case would be a small program based on a parser with YACC
compatible grammar which extracts the program flow tree.

http://sourceforge.net/search/?type_...ords=flowchart
FCOL

[Crooter]

Thanks a lot, Jojo, it looks like the most suitable solution.
Joachim Schmitz:

Crooter wrote:

....skipped...

Not really OT here (guess it'd be topical in comp.unix.programmer), but try
looking for cflow.

Bye, Jojo

[Crooter]

Thank you, the tools you mentioned are quite good for human analysis
of source code (graphical representation especially), but I was
looking for something more 'internal' or intermediate. Still the ideas
in the tools can be interesting.

To be honest, I'm surprised with the speed you answered. I wish I
could help anybody so fast. :)

On 16 ÑÎ×, 07:00, user923005 <[e-mail]:

On Jan 15, 6:26šam, Crooter <[e-mail]:
http://sourceforge.net/search/?type_..._of_search=sof....
FCOL

[Default User]

Crooter wrote:

Thanks a lot, Jojo, it looks like the most suitable solution.

Please don't top-post. Your replies belong following or interspersed
with properly trimmed quotes. See the majority of other posts in the
newsgroup, or:
<http://www.caliburn.nl/topposting.html>

[CBFalconer]

Crooter wrote: *** and top-posted. Fixed. ***

>

.... snip ...

>
Thank you, the tools you mentioned are quite good for human
analysis of source code (graphical representation especially),
but I was looking for something more 'internal' or intermediate.
Still the ideas in the tools can be interesting.

To be honest, I'm surprised with the speed you answered. I wish
I could help anybody so fast. :)

Please do not top-post. Your answer belongs after (or intermixed
with) the quoted material to which you reply, after snipping all
irrelevant material. I fixed this one. See the following links:

--
<http://www.catb.org/~esr/faqs/smart-questions.html>
<http://www.caliburn.nl/topposting.html>
<http://www.netmeister.org/news/learn2quote.html>
<http://cfaj.freeshell.org/google/ (taming google)
<http://members.fortunecity.com/nnqweb/ (newusers)

--
Posted via a free Usenet account from http://www.teranews.com