468,512 Members | 1,360 Online
Bytes | Developer Community
New Post

Home Posts Topics Members FAQ

Post your question to a community of 468,512 developers. It's quick & easy.

Test your C++ Skill(Online test C++)

go to http://www.itworld2.com to take online test of c++...........
Dec 30 '07 #1
9 9399
pr******@gmail.com wrote:
go to http://www.itworld2.com to take online test of c++...........
Couldn't log in to the spam site, but your "basics" were so wrong I
can't imagine how useless the test was going to be.
Dec 30 '07 #2
On 30 Dec, 13:54, Ron Natalie <r...@spamcop.netwrote:
preet...@gmail.com wrote:
go to *** to take online test of c++...........

Couldn't log in to the spam site, but your "basics" were so wrong I
can't imagine how useless the test was going to be.
He's also plugged this test in comp.lang.c, so he clearly doesn't know
what he is doing.
Dec 30 '07 #3
On Dec 31, 2:41*am, gw7...@aol.com wrote:
On 30 Dec, 13:54, Ron Natalie <r...@spamcop.netwrote:
preet...@gmail.com wrote:
go to *** to take online test of c++...........
Couldn't log in to the spam site, but your "basics" were so wrong I
can't imagine how useless the test was going to be.

He's also plugged this test in comp.lang.c, so he clearly doesn't know
what he is doing.
Say all these things afetr seeing the test..............please......
Dec 31 '07 #4

<pr******@gmail.comwrote in message
news:da**********************************@e25g2000 prg.googlegroups.com...
go to http://www.itworld2.com to take online test of c++...........
Why?

Dec 31 '07 #5
pr******@gmail.com wrote:
On Dec 31, 2:41 am, gw7...@aol.com wrote:
>On 30 Dec, 13:54, Ron Natalie <r...@spamcop.netwrote:
>>preet...@gmail.com wrote:
go to *** to take online test of c++...........
>>Couldn't log in to the spam site, but your "basics" were so wrong I
can't imagine how useless the test was going to be.

He's also plugged this test in comp.lang.c, so he clearly doesn't
know what he is doing.

Say all these things afetr seeing the test..............please......
The site is badly designed, didn't see a test. I don't bother with badly
designed cluttered sites.

--
Jim Langston
ta*******@rocketmail.com
Dec 31 '07 #6
pmp
On Jan 1, 2:19*am, "Jim Langston" <tazmas...@rocketmail.comwrote:
preet...@gmail.com wrote:
On Dec 31, 2:41 am, gw7...@aol.com wrote:
On 30 Dec, 13:54, Ron Natalie <r...@spamcop.netwrote:
>preet...@gmail.com wrote:
go to *** to take online test of c++...........
>Couldn't log in to the spam site, but your "basics" were so wrong I
can't imagine how useless the test was going to be.
He's also plugged this test in comp.lang.c, so he clearly doesn't
know what he is doing.
Say all these things afetr seeing the test..............please......

The site is badly designed, didn't see a test. *I don't bother with badly
designed cluttered sites.

--
Jim Langston
tazmas...@rocketmail.com
give some tips how to design good site.............
Jan 2 '08 #7
pmp wrote:
On Jan 1, 2:19 am, "Jim Langston" <tazmas...@rocketmail.comwrote:
>preet...@gmail.com wrote:
>>On Dec 31, 2:41 am, gw7...@aol.com wrote:
On 30 Dec, 13:54, Ron Natalie <r...@spamcop.netwrote:
>>>>preet...@gmail.com wrote:
>go to *** to take online test of c++...........
>>>>Couldn't log in to the spam site, but your "basics" were so wrong
I can't imagine how useless the test was going to be.
>>>He's also plugged this test in comp.lang.c, so he clearly doesn't
know what he is doing.
>>Say all these things afetr seeing the test..............please......

The site is badly designed, didn't see a test. I don't bother with
badly designed cluttered sites.

--
Jim Langston
tazmas...@rocketmail.com

give some tips how to design good site.............
Sorry, pmp, designing good sites is off topic here. If you have
a C++ question/announcement, do share.

V
--
Please remove capital 'A's when replying by e-mail
I do not respond to top-posted replies, please don't ask
Jan 2 '08 #8
Awful
Victor Bazarov wrote:
pmp wrote:
>On Jan 1, 2:19 am, "Jim Langston" <tazmas...@rocketmail.comwrote:
>>preet...@gmail.com wrote:
On Dec 31, 2:41 am, gw7...@aol.com wrote:
On 30 Dec, 13:54, Ron Natalie <r...@spamcop.netwrote:
>preet...@gmail.com wrote:
>>go to *** to take online test of c++...........
>Couldn't log in to the spam site, but your "basics" were so wrong
>I can't imagine how useless the test was going to be.
He's also plugged this test in comp.lang.c, so he clearly doesn't
know what he is doing.
Say all these things afetr seeing the test..............please......
The site is badly designed, didn't see a test. I don't bother with
badly designed cluttered sites.

--
Jim Langston
tazmas...@rocketmail.com
give some tips how to design good site.............
Sorry, pmp, designing good sites is off topic here. If you have
a C++ question/announcement, do share.

V


-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org

iD8DBQFHfjMFnHsnC58utpwRAnzfAKCdsyVMEmJJnSGUz44Qye f8FbNQOQCgogK5
Q7NF3CSyq9I/yJNE6q1d/EY=
=8QZU
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

Jan 4 '08 #9
On Dec 30 2007, 4:31*am, preet...@gmail.com wrote:
go tohttp://www.itworld2.comto take online test of c++...........
Maybe if you didn't try to harvest email addresses
people might log in. But since that seems to be
what you are trying to do, you can GTAFFAARD.
Socks
Jan 4 '08 #10

This discussion thread is closed

Replies have been disabled for this discussion.

Similar topics

162 posts views Thread by techievasant | last post: by
34 posts views Thread by Kishor | last post: by
14 posts views Thread by preeto50 | last post: by
6 posts views Thread by Freshers Jobs | last post: by
By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.