9 9484 pr******@gmail.com wrote:
go to http://www.itworld2.com to take online test of c++...........
Couldn't log in to the spam site, but your "basics" were so wrong I
can't imagine how useless the test was going to be.
On 30 Dec, 13:54, Ron Natalie <r...@spamcop.netwrote:
preet...@gmail.com wrote:
go to *** to take online test of c++...........
Couldn't log in to the spam site, but your "basics" were so wrong I
can't imagine how useless the test was going to be.
He's also plugged this test in comp.lang.c, so he clearly doesn't know
what he is doing.
On Dec 31, 2:41*am, gw7...@aol.com wrote:
On 30 Dec, 13:54, Ron Natalie <r...@spamcop.netwrote:
preet...@gmail.com wrote:
go to *** to take online test of c++...........
Couldn't log in to the spam site, but your "basics" were so wrong I
can't imagine how useless the test was going to be.
He's also plugged this test in comp.lang.c, so he clearly doesn't know
what he is doing.
Say all these things afetr seeing the test..............please......
<pr******@gmail.comwrote in message
news:da**********************************@e25g2000 prg.googlegroups.com...
go to http://www.itworld2.com to take online test of c++...........
Why? pr******@gmail.com wrote:
On Dec 31, 2:41 am, gw7...@aol.com wrote:
>On 30 Dec, 13:54, Ron Natalie <r...@spamcop.netwrote:
>>preet...@gmail.com wrote: go to *** to take online test of c++...........
>>Couldn't log in to the spam site, but your "basics" were so wrong I can't imagine how useless the test was going to be.
He's also plugged this test in comp.lang.c, so he clearly doesn't know what he is doing.
Say all these things afetr seeing the test..............please......
The site is badly designed, didn't see a test. I don't bother with badly
designed cluttered sites.
--
Jim Langston ta*******@rocketmail.com
On Jan 1, 2:19*am, "Jim Langston" <tazmas...@rocketmail.comwrote:
preet...@gmail.com wrote:
On Dec 31, 2:41 am, gw7...@aol.com wrote:
On 30 Dec, 13:54, Ron Natalie <r...@spamcop.netwrote:
>preet...@gmail.com wrote: go to *** to take online test of c++...........
>Couldn't log in to the spam site, but your "basics" were so wrong I can't imagine how useless the test was going to be.
He's also plugged this test in comp.lang.c, so he clearly doesn't
know what he is doing.
Say all these things afetr seeing the test..............please......
The site is badly designed, didn't see a test. *I don't bother with badly
designed cluttered sites.
--
Jim Langston
tazmas...@rocketmail.com
give some tips how to design good site.............
pmp wrote:
On Jan 1, 2:19 am, "Jim Langston" <tazmas...@rocketmail.comwrote:
>preet...@gmail.com wrote:
>>On Dec 31, 2:41 am, gw7...@aol.com wrote: On 30 Dec, 13:54, Ron Natalie <r...@spamcop.netwrote:
>>>>preet...@gmail.com wrote: >go to *** to take online test of c++...........
>>>>Couldn't log in to the spam site, but your "basics" were so wrong I can't imagine how useless the test was going to be.
>>>He's also plugged this test in comp.lang.c, so he clearly doesn't know what he is doing.
>>Say all these things afetr seeing the test..............please......
The site is badly designed, didn't see a test. I don't bother with badly designed cluttered sites.
-- Jim Langston tazmas...@rocketmail.com
give some tips how to design good site.............
Sorry, pmp, designing good sites is off topic here. If you have
a C++ question/announcement, do share.
V
--
Please remove capital 'A's when replying by e-mail
I do not respond to top-posted replies, please don't ask
Awful
Victor Bazarov wrote:
pmp wrote:
>On Jan 1, 2:19 am, "Jim Langston" <tazmas...@rocketmail.comwrote:
>>preet...@gmail.com wrote: On Dec 31, 2:41 am, gw7...@aol.com wrote: On 30 Dec, 13:54, Ron Natalie <r...@spamcop.netwrote: >preet...@gmail.com wrote: >>go to *** to take online test of c++........... >Couldn't log in to the spam site, but your "basics" were so wrong >I can't imagine how useless the test was going to be. He's also plugged this test in comp.lang.c, so he clearly doesn't know what he is doing. Say all these things afetr seeing the test..............please...... The site is badly designed, didn't see a test. I don't bother with badly designed cluttered sites.
-- Jim Langston tazmas...@rocketmail.com
give some tips how to design good site.............
Sorry, pmp, designing good sites is off topic here. If you have
a C++ question/announcement, do share.
V
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org
iD8DBQFHfjMFnHsnC58utpwRAnzfAKCdsyVMEmJJnSGUz44Qye f8FbNQOQCgogK5
Q7NF3CSyq9I/yJNE6q1d/EY=
=8QZU
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
On Dec 30 2007, 4:31*am, preet...@gmail.com wrote:
go tohttp://www.itworld2.comto take online test of c++...........
Maybe if you didn't try to harvest email addresses
people might log in. But since that seems to be
what you are trying to do, you can GTAFFAARD.
Socks This discussion thread is closed Replies have been disabled for this discussion. Similar topics
51 posts
views
Thread by Matt |
last post: by
|
162 posts
views
Thread by techievasant |
last post: by
|
34 posts
views
Thread by Kishor |
last post: by
|
6 posts
views
Thread by Biel |
last post: by
|
14 posts
views
Thread by preeto50 |
last post: by
|
6 posts
views
Thread by Freshers Jobs |
last post: by
| | | | | | | | | | | |