Ivan Novick wrote:
CBFalconer <cbfalco...@yahoo.comwrote:
>Ivan Novick wrote:
>>The advantage to using APR or some other widely used library, is
it has been peer reviewed and tested in production by many people
all over the world.
So has hashlib. I made a trivial adjustment last year. Before
that the last bug report was in 2002. I have had no further bug
reports. You obviously haven't looked at it.
My question is: is hashlib solely your code?
I am not doubting the quality of your code... but its different to
have a solution from a single developer available from their personal
site, than to have one from a relatively large and reputable
organization like the apache foundation.
If the code was at least available as a package in the major linux
distros (redhat, suse, debian, etc) than I would be fine with it.
You are being ridiculous. The source is there, you can evaluate
the quality for yourself.
Before I wrote it I discussed the interface with various members of
the c.l.c group. This resulted in some interface modifications.
The code is mine. I issue the licenses. Everybody gets a free GPL
license.
--
Merry Christmas, Happy Hanukah, Happy New Year
Joyeux Noel, Bonne Annee, Frohe Weihnachten
Chuck F (cbfalconer at maineline dot net)
<http://cbfalconer.home.att.net>
--
Posted via a free Usenet account from
http://www.teranews.com