Sorry for all the cross posting but I'm interesting in getting a serious
discussion about how usenet has become lately.
Many people are moving away from usenet because of all the spam and cooks
that have been showing up. The rate of spammer seem to be growing
exponentially(ok, not really but it feels like it).
I think maybe its time to do something about it. What I'd like to see happen
is an "upgrade" to usenet. I do not like th forum based communiations that
has sprung up lately but since it solves many of usenet's shortcommings I
believe that will will take over.
If many people feel the same way then maybe we can move on to something
better and increase the efficiency and productivity that usenet was meant
for.
Some ideas I have are:
1. Cook repellent - Some method to prevent cooks from interrupting normal
flow. Either having a voting scheme or some type of identifying means to
either completely remove them or at least make it easier to avoid them.
2. Spam repellent - Similar to Cooks.
3. Meta data - Have the ability to directly include graphics and things like
TeX into messages. For those that do not want to view it they can disable it
or have some other means to see it.
4. Specific tools for groups - Different groups have different needs for
communication. Mathematics groups need to efficiently communicate
mathematical formulas while electronics need to communicate schematics.
5. Moderation - Potentially give regular users of the group the ability to
"quasi-moderate" or in general just have a wide range of options to have
more control over groups(But not to much).
6. Non-anomality or some way to slow down spammers. Maybe better routing
data and such.
7. Potentially "Backwards compatible" with usenet - have the ability to surf
usenet with the same client to help make a smoother transition.
----
In any case this is extremely preliminary and just some thoughts. It seems
that usenet has started to go down the drain. Hopefully there are those out
there that are interested in keeping it alive. I'm thinking something very
similar to usenet but with just more "features".
If enough people are interested in doing this then maybe we can put
something together. All ideas and suggestions are welcome.
Thanks,
Jon
Oct 8 '07
224  6260 
On Sun, 14 Oct 2007 15:02:02 -0700, Michael Press wrote:
Lester Zick <do********@nowhere.netwrote:
>On Sat, 13 Oct 2007 13:11:13 -0700, Michael Press <ru****@pacbell.net>
Lester Zick <do********@nowhere.netwrote:
On Fri, 12 Oct 2007 06:59:09 -0400, "Michael A. Terrell"
Lester Zick wrote:
[...]
I know. But it's the best I could do at your level.
Be careful, or you'll give yourself a hernia while trying to reach
that high.
Patriotism being the last resort of scoundrels.
^^^^^^
refuge
^^^^^
Even scoundrels need a last resort.
You did not look up the quotation, even after I posted a correction.
The corrected phrase above remains a misquotation.
Do you know who wrote the line?
This guy? http://www.samueljohnson.com/refuge.html
The thing is, there are true Patriots, who Love America, in her original
form (and really disapprove of what the scoundrels are doing to her), and
there are the scoundrels who hide behind the flag: "You disagree with our
Beloved Infallible Fearless Leader? You're UNPATRIOTIC!!!!!!!"
Thanks,
Rich
On Sun, 14 Oct 2007 15:20:42 -0700, Michael Press
<ru****@pacbell.netwrote:
>In article
<ug********************************@4ax.com>,
John Fields <jf*****@austininstruments.comwrote:
>On Sun, 14 Oct 2007 11:02:56 -0700, Lester Zick
<do********@nowhere.netwrote:
>On Sat, 13 Oct 2007 18:18:01 -0500, John Fields
<jf*****@austininstruments.comwrote:
On Sat, 13 Oct 2007 09:23:24 -0700, Lester Zick
<do********@nowhere.netwrote:
On Fri, 12 Oct 2007 11:42:50 -0500, John Fields
<jf*****@austininstruments.comwrote:
>>Also, it seems to be in more or less common use:
>
>Most movie script citations are.
---
Art reflects life, dontcha know?
But nothing reflects you.
---
A mirror do.
And my art reflects my life.
And now you're being tedious, tendentious, and pompous.
---
Hardly. I was merely demonstrating that the sentence you wrote:
"But nothing reflects you." wasn't true, on several levels.
Certainly, for his own spiritual development, someone who goes on
and on about the importance of truth needs to be apprised of his
lack of veracity, wouldn't you agree?
---
>Why don't you
admire your reflection in the mirror some more.
---
Narcissism isn't my strong suit.
---
>And we're still
awaiting demonstrations of truth for your opinions, princess.
---
Remember R2?
You got two clues and you still can't figure it out, huh, bozo?
---
>>A US patent, several articles published in trade journals, a
successful company, and many original free designs posted to USENET
pro bono.
That's just swell, princess.
And you?
Demonstrations of universal truth by finite tautological reduction to
self contradictory alternatives and exhaustive reduction of boolean
conjunctions in mechanical terms. Nothing much.
---
"Nothing much"? Pride goes before a fall, you know, you smug,
condescending ass.
You all may find the original line of use.
Proverbs, 16:18
Pride goeth before destruction,
and an haughty spirit before a fall.
Even more apt, eh?
---
Yes. Thank you.
--
JF
John Fields jf*****@austininstruments.com posted to
sci.electronics.design:
On Sun, 14 Oct 2007 11:17:30 -0700, Lester Zick
<do********@nowhere.netwrote:
>>On Sun, 14 Oct 2007 07:28:56 -0500, John Fields
<jf*****@austininstruments.comwrote:
>>>On Sat, 13 Oct 2007 09:27:20 -0700, Lester Zick
<do********@nowhere.netwrote:
Geez, my noticing
On Fri, 12 Oct 2007 12:37:36 -0500, John Fields
<jf*****@austininstruments.comwrote:
>On Fri, 12 Oct 2007 09:33:12 -0700, Lester Zick
><do********@nowhere.netwrote:
>
>>On Thu, 11 Oct 2007 21:45:26 -0700, ChairmanOfTheBored
>><RU*****@crackasmile.orgwrote:
>
>>Your IQ just dropped 40 points. Our knowledge of your
>>maturity level
>>>just peaked.
>>>
>> In these groups, you're toast, boy.
>>
>>Good. Then eat me.
>
>---
>Yet another homosexual reference...
Wherein Captain Obvious eats his heart out.
---
Captain Obvious?
Thanks. :-)
I like that, since it seems to indicate that you think I can
separate the wheat from the chaff.
I can, and I'm not interested in eating chaff.
Nor, apparently, in producing demonstrations of truth for your
opinions, Captain Oblivious.
---
Now it's Captain Oblivious?
I see. It's one or the other depending on your mood?
Remember R2? That's a pretty good demo and so far you haven't
posted an answer. Perhaps because - oh, I don't know - you don't
want to have to admit to the fact that it's true and lose what
little face you've got left?
The only face he has left is troll face. Let's take even that from
him.
John Fields jf*****@austininstruments.com posted to
sci.electronics.design:
On Sun, 14 Oct 2007 11:31:08 -0700, Lester Zick
<do********@nowhere.netwrote:
>>On Sun, 14 Oct 2007 07:05:59 -0500, John Fields
<jf*****@austininstruments.comwrote:
>>>On Sat, 13 Oct 2007 10:01:28 -0700, Lester Zick
<do********@nowhere.netwrote:
On Fri, 12 Oct 2007 18:34:03 -0500, John Fields
<jf*****@austininstruments.comwrote:
>Are you familiar with "Seppuku"?
No, but let's hope you are.
---
Why would you hope I am if you don't know what it means?
Jesus, aren't you the clever one. I just hoped you might know what
you were talking about for a change.
---
Man, are you full of shit!
---
>>>BTW, "No, but let's hope you are." should read:
"No, but I hope you are."
That is, unless you have some sort of kindergarten following.
Well there's you and Dork and apparently quite a few others. My
threads have proven immensely popular over the last few years.
---
ISTM you're the one who's doing the following since you wandered in
here by accident and seem to be hanging out because you like the
spankings.
The "immense popularity" of your posts is probably due to the same
reason people can't take their eyes away from a train wreck.
I suspect that you may be on to something, he seems think that USENET
is some kind of popularity contest and that mere volume of posts is
popularity and acclaim. That would clarify what some of the pain
sluts that have come around are after. They seem to think that
universal derision is glory.
ehsjr wrote:
>
Michael A. Terrell wrote:
http://home.earthlink.net/~fay.terre...-day-2007.html
Nice!
Ed
Thanks. I converted the large flag shot into wallpaper for various
resolutions. They will be available on the new Central Florida
Veteran's website, when its launched. Several local agencies have asked
for copies of all the photos I take at these events. I just finished
downgrading a Emachines 1220 from XP home to Windows ME, to use my
favorite graphics tools. They crash or hang under XP, but have never
failed me on the earlier Emachines Etower 733i, running ME.
Several of those photos are crooked, because the only clear spot I
could find was contoured for drainage. I had to keep my cane in my left
hand, leaving me with one free hand for the camera & tripod. I am
trying to rebuild a used power chair, and build a joystick controlled
telescoping mast and camera mount to be able to take better pictures.
--
Service to my country? Been there, Done that, and I've got my DD214 to
prove it.
Member of DAV #85.
Michael A. Terrell
Central Florida
In article
<us********************************@4ax.com>,
John Larkin
<jj******@highNOTlandTHIStechnologyPART.comwrote :
On Sun, 14 Oct 2007 15:02:02 -0700, Michael Press <ru****@pacbell.net>
wrote:
In article
<gj********************************@4ax.com>,
Lester Zick <do********@nowhere.netwrote:
On Sat, 13 Oct 2007 13:11:13 -0700, Michael Press <ru****@pacbell.net>
wrote:
In article
<lk********************************@4ax.com>,
Lester Zick <do********@nowhere.netwrote:
On Fri, 12 Oct 2007 06:59:09 -0400, "Michael A. Terrell"
<mi**********@earthlink.netwrote:
Lester Zick wrote:
[...]
I know. But it's the best I could do at your level.
Be careful, or you'll give yourself a hernia while trying to reach
that high.
Patriotism being the last resort of scoundrels.
^^^^^^
refuge
^^^^^
Even scoundrels need a last resort.
You did not look up the quotation, even after I posted a correction.
The corrected phrase above remains a misquotation.
Do you know who wrote the line?
Obviously, Michael A. Terrell wrote the line.
Ah, yes.
Who wrote "Patriotism is the last refuge of a scoundrel"?
Samuel Johnson.
This epigram should never be taken to be
deriding patriotism.
--
Michael Press
On Sun, 14 Oct 2007 22:45:27 -0700, Michael Press <ru****@pacbell.net>
wrote:
>In article
<us********************************@4ax.com>,
John Larkin
<jj******@highNOTlandTHIStechnologyPART.comwrote :
>On Sun, 14 Oct 2007 15:02:02 -0700, Michael Press <ru****@pacbell.net>
wrote:
>In article
<gj********************************@4ax.com>,
Lester Zick <do********@nowhere.netwrote:
On Sat, 13 Oct 2007 13:11:13 -0700, Michael Press <ru****@pacbell.net>
wrote:
In article
<lk********************************@4ax.com>,
Lester Zick <do********@nowhere.netwrote:
On Fri, 12 Oct 2007 06:59:09 -0400, "Michael A. Terrell"
<mi**********@earthlink.netwrote:
Lester Zick wrote:
[...]
I know. But it's the best I could do at your level.
Be careful, or you'll give yourself a hernia while trying to reach
that high.
Patriotism being the last resort of scoundrels.
^^^^^^
refuge
^^^^^
Even scoundrels need a last resort.
You did not look up the quotation, even after I posted a correction.
The corrected phrase above remains a misquotation.
Do you know who wrote the line?
Obviously, Michael A. Terrell wrote the line.
Ah, yes.
Who wrote "Patriotism is the last refuge of a scoundrel"?
Samuel Johnson.
This epigram should never be taken to be
deriding patriotism.
Don't be a fathead. Nobody likes a fathead.
John
On Mon, 08 Oct 2007 08:32:57 -0400, Rick Decker <rd*****@hamilton.edu>
wrote:
I have an idea. Just delete sci.math from the alist and then you can
all get back on your hobby horses and continue to study Ohm's law and
Mho's law and Mike the Martyr's patriotism without my sayso.
~v~~
On Fri, 12 Oct 2007 17:58:45 -0700, ChairmanOfTheBored
<RU*****@crackasmile.orgwrote:
>On Fri, 12 Oct 2007 06:59:09 -0400, "Michael A. Terrell"
<mi**********@earthlink.netwrote:
>>Lester Zick wrote:
>>>
On Wed, 10 Oct 2007 17:00:58 -0700, ChairmanOfTheBored
<RU*****@crackasmile.orgwrote:
On Wed, 10 Oct 2007 10:05:34 -0700, Lester Zick <do********@nowhere.net>
wrote:
Oh gee, professor, not really? And what about usenet postings where
servers have some difficulty with proportional spacing, where a choice
has to be made between ragged paragraphs and colloquial punctuation?
Next time your skirts get in a tizzy, complain to the servers not moi.
Utter bullshit.
I know. But it's the best I could do at your level.
Be careful, or you'll give yourself a hernia while trying to reach
that high.
I find it amusing that it took a real twit like the ZickTard to cause
you to compliment me. :-]
I can think of a couple of much more interesting plays on "Lester
Zick."
John
On Mon, 15 Oct 2007 11:32:10 -0700, John Larkin wrote:
On Fri, 12 Oct 2007 17:58:45 -0700, ChairmanOfTheBored
>>On Fri, 12 Oct 2007 06:59:09 -0400, "Michael A. Terrell"
>>>Lester Zick wrote:
On Wed, 10 Oct 2007 17:00:58 -0700, ChairmanOfTheBored
On Wed, 10 Oct 2007 10:05:34 -0700, Lester Zick <do********@nowhere.net>
Oh gee, professor, not really? And what about usenet postings where
servers have some difficulty with proportional spacing, where a choice
has to be made between ragged paragraphs and colloquial punctuation?
Next time your skirts get in a tizzy, complain to the servers not moi.
Utter bullshit.
I know. But it's the best I could do at your level.
Be careful, or you'll give yourself a hernia while trying to reach
that high.
I find it amusing that it took a real twit like the ZickTard to cause
you to compliment me. :-]
I can think of a couple of much more interesting plays on "Lester
Zick."
Has the chairman of the boring been hoist by his own 'tard? ;-)
Cheers!
Rich
On Mon, 15 Oct 2007 11:32:10 -0700, John Larkin
<jj******@highNOTlandTHIStechnologyPART.comwrote :
>On Fri, 12 Oct 2007 17:58:45 -0700, ChairmanOfTheBored
<RU*****@crackasmile.orgwrote:
>>On Fri, 12 Oct 2007 06:59:09 -0400, "Michael A. Terrell"
<mi**********@earthlink.netwrote:
>>>Lester Zick wrote:
On Wed, 10 Oct 2007 17:00:58 -0700, ChairmanOfTheBored
<RU*****@crackasmile.orgwrote:
On Wed, 10 Oct 2007 10:05:34 -0700, Lester Zick <do********@nowhere.net>
wrote:
Oh gee, professor, not really? And what about usenet postings where
servers have some difficulty with proportional spacing, where a choice
has to be made between ragged paragraphs and colloquial punctuation?
Next time your skirts get in a tizzy, complain to the servers not moi.
Utter bullshit.
I know. But it's the best I could do at your level.
Be careful, or you'll give yourself a hernia while trying to reach
that high.
I find it amusing that it took a real twit like the ZickTard to cause
you to compliment me. :-]
I can think of a couple of much more interesting plays on "Lester
Zick."
---
I already used 'Zester Lick'; whatcha got?
--
JF
On Mon, 15 Oct 2007 18:57:26 -0500, John Fields
<jf*****@austininstruments.comwrote:
>On Mon, 15 Oct 2007 11:32:10 -0700, John Larkin
<jj******@highNOTlandTHIStechnologyPART.comwrot e:
>>On Fri, 12 Oct 2007 17:58:45 -0700, ChairmanOfTheBored
<RU*****@crackasmile.orgwrote:
>>>On Fri, 12 Oct 2007 06:59:09 -0400, "Michael A. Terrell"
<mi**********@earthlink.netwrote:
Lester Zick wrote:
>
On Wed, 10 Oct 2007 17:00:58 -0700, ChairmanOfTheBored
<RU*****@crackasmile.orgwrote:
>
On Wed, 10 Oct 2007 10:05:34 -0700, Lester Zick <do********@nowhere.net>
wrote:
>Oh gee, professor, not really? And what about usenet postings where
>servers have some difficulty with proportional spacing, where a choice
>has to be made between ragged paragraphs and colloquial punctuation?
>Next time your skirts get in a tizzy, complain to the servers not moi.
Utter bullshit.
>
I know. But it's the best I could do at your level.
Be careful, or you'll give yourself a hernia while trying to reach
that high.
I find it amusing that it took a real twit like the ZickTard to cause
you to compliment me. :-]
I can think of a couple of much more interesting plays on "Lester
Zick."
---
I already used 'Zester Lick'; whatcha got?
Lesser Dick?
John
In article <tj********************************@4ax.com>, do********@nowhere.net says...
On Fri, 12 Oct 2007 07:34:13 -0500, John Fields
<jf*****@austininstruments.comwrote:
On Thu, 11 Oct 2007 16:26:13 -0700, Lester Zick
<do********@nowhere.netwrote:
>On Thu, 11 Oct 2007 14:53:14 -0500, John Fields
> and why do you find it necessary to try to berate him at every
opportunity?
Because he insists on draping himself in the flag and acting like he's
the only one who's ever been there or done that and that it somehow
has a bearing on the issues raised here.
---
Funny, but in my view that's not the way he comes across at all in
that he very seldom, if ever, brings up his military experiences
unless someone asks him about them.
He brings it up in every sig file attached to every post. You're being
disingenuous which I suppose is about the most we can expect from you.
Do you always get this upset at sig files? Perhaps you shouldn't read
them. ...or grow some skin. A brain wouldn't hurt either.
You, however, have made a couple of unwarranted references to
flag-waving and have been generally belligerent toward him,
ostensibly because of his military background, so I think there's a
little more going on in your head than you want to admit.
You really are incredibly stupid. I offer disclaimers and explain the
disclaimers and you go right on insisting that I'm dissing Michael's
military service. Military partisanship has no bearing on the course
of science, truth, or issues of
Neither do you, so what's your excuse for living?
public censorship.
The only one attempting to "censor" anyone here is you. You don't
like Michael's sig, so berate his service to get his sig removed.
That looks pretty childish to everyone here. Fruitless and childish.
--
Keith
In article <ka********************************@4ax.com>, jf*****@austininstruments.com says...
On Thu, 11 Oct 2007 11:50:46 -0700, Lester Zick
<do********@nowhere.netwrote:
On Thu, 11 Oct 2007 09:21:56 -0400, "Michael A. Terrell"
<mi**********@earthlink.netwrote:
>ChairmanOfTheBored wrote:
On Wed, 10 Oct 2007 09:08:14 -0700, Lester Zick <do********@nowhere.net>
wrote:
On 9 Oct 2007 23:16:09 GMT, "Default User" <de***********@yahoo.com>
wrote:
Lester Zick wrote:
On 8 Oct 2007 21:01:53 GMT, "Default User" <de***********@yahoo.com>
wrote:
Michael A. Terrell wrote:
Soldiers during WWII didn't need it 'prepared', and if
it was good enough for them, it should be plenty good enough for
you!
Yeah, and LOT of those guys are dead now. Coincidence? I think not.
They got shot with spam?
Ewww, Spam bullets. Was that an episode of Mythbusters?
No. It was an episode of "BabbleOn 5".
Now I remember where I saw you.
You were the star in that flic "Total Retard".
He was your stand in.
I do not stand in.
^^ up
---
Nor do you stand out.
Yeah, he does, like a just-struck thumb.
--
Keith
In article <qv********************************@4ax.com>, do********@nowhere.net says...
On Mon, 08 Oct 2007 08:32:57 -0400, Rick Decker <rd*****@hamilton.edu>
wrote:
I have an idea. Just delete sci.math from the alist and then you can
all get back on your hobby horses and continue to study Ohm's law and
Mho's law and Mike the Martyr's patriotism without my sayso.
*Your* say-so?! Who is attempting censorship now? You're a
friggin' panty-waisted hypocritical moron.
Tell me, how much work is it to be dumber than a donkey?
--
Keith
In article <47***************@earthlink.net>, mi**********@earthlink.net says...
ChairmanOfTheBored wrote:
On Fri, 12 Oct 2007 06:59:09 -0400, "Michael A. Terrell"
<mi**********@earthlink.netwrote:
>Lester Zick wrote:
>>
>On Wed, 10 Oct 2007 17:00:58 -0700, ChairmanOfTheBored
><RU*****@crackasmile.orgwrote:
>>
>On Wed, 10 Oct 2007 10:05:34 -0700, Lester Zick <do********@nowhere.net>
>wrote:
>
>>Oh gee, professor, not really? And what about usenet postings where
>>servers have some difficulty with proportional spacing, where a choice
>>has to be made between ragged paragraphs and colloquial punctuation?
>>Next time your skirts get in a tizzy, complain to the servers not moi.
>
Utter bullshit.
>>
>I know. But it's the best I could do at your level.
>
>
Be careful, or you'll give yourself a hernia while trying to reach
>that high.
I find it amusing that it took a real twit like the ZickTard to cause
you to compliment me. :-]
Credit where credit is due. Sick has no credit, and is socially
bankrupt. There's still hope for you. ;-)
Hmm, I didn't take it as a compliment, for either. Kinda like,
"you're lower than a slug's lower intestine."
--
Keith
In article <k3********************************@4ax.com>, do********@nowhere.net says...
On Mon, 08 Oct 2007 19:55:28 -0700, John Larkin
<jj******@highNOTlandTHIStechnologyPART.comwrote :
On Mon, 08 Oct 2007 18:02:16 -0700, "Herbert John \"Jackie\" Gleason"
<Bu************@Texarkanacops.govwrote:
>On Mon, 08 Oct 2007 14:23:42 -0700, Lester Zick <do********@nowhere.net>
wrote:
It will only get worse and I just think that nipping the problems in the bud
is the best solution instead of waiting until their full blown.
It's good to know the problem itself isn't already full blown.
They guy has a severe problem with the word "they're" in several
^^^^^^^^
>locations in this thread alone.
They guy?
Funny.
Hoist with his own petard? Hard to make a serious point when people
are laughing.
No, that is _not_ why you're having a hard time, though everyone is
laughing at you.
--
Keith
krw wrote:
In article <qv********************************@4ax.com>,
do********@nowhere.net says...
>On Mon, 08 Oct 2007 08:32:57 -0400, Rick Decker <rd*****@hamilton.edu>
wrote:
I have an idea. Just delete sci.math from the alist and then you can
all get back on your hobby horses and continue to study Ohm's law and
Mho's law and Mike the Martyr's patriotism without my sayso.
*Your* say-so?! Who is attempting censorship now? You're a
friggin' panty-waisted hypocritical moron.
Tell me, how much work is it to be dumber than a donkey?
Don't ask me, I never wrote that. Looks as Lester chimed in.
Go talk to him.
Regards,
Rick
can't we all just get along? group hug. group hug!
--
Regards,
Alvin Bruney
------------------------------------------------------
Shameless Author Plug
OWC Black Book 2nd Edition
Exclusively on www.lulu.com/owc
$24.99
"Rick Decker" <rd*****@hamilton.eduwrote in message
news:d4******************************@hamilton.edu ...
krw wrote:
>In article <qv********************************@4ax.com>,
do********@nowhere.net says...
>>On Mon, 08 Oct 2007 08:32:57 -0400, Rick Decker <rd*****@hamilton.edu>
wrote:
I have an idea. Just delete sci.math from the alist and then you can
all get back on your hobby horses and continue to study Ohm's law and
Mho's law and Mike the Martyr's patriotism without my sayso.
*Your* say-so?! Who is attempting censorship now? You're a friggin'
panty-waisted hypocritical moron. Tell me, how much work is it to be
dumber than a donkey?
Don't ask me, I never wrote that. Looks as Lester chimed in.
Go talk to him.
Regards,
Rick
On Oct 8, 11:30 am, D from BC <myrealaddr...@comic.comwrote:
I like the wild wild west feel of usenet. Raw, unmoderated and free :)
Yeeee hahhhhh....bang bang bang
"Give it to us raw and wriggling. You keep nasty taters." http://www.framecaplib.com/lotrlib/h...tt/ttt0743.htm
In article <d4******************************@hamilton.edu>, rd*****@hamilton.edu says...
krw wrote:
In article <qv********************************@4ax.com>,
do********@nowhere.net says...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
On Mon, 08 Oct 2007 08:32:57 -0400, Rick Decker <rd*****@hamilton.edu>
wrote:
I have an idea. Just delete sci.math from the alist and then you can
all get back on your hobby horses and continue to study Ohm's law and
Mho's law and Mike the Martyr's patriotism without my sayso.
*Your* say-so?! Who is attempting censorship now? You're a
friggin' panty-waisted hypocritical moron.
Tell me, how much work is it to be dumber than a donkey?
Don't ask me, I never wrote that. Looks as Lester chimed in.
Go talk to him.
I didn't say you did. Lester the molester snipped your words but
left your attribution.
--
Keith
In article <OE**************@TK2MSFTNGP05.phx.gbl>, "Alvin Bruney
[MVP]" <some guy without an email addresssays...
can't we all just get along? group hug. group hug!
Ew! With a top poster?
--
Keith
In article <47***************@earthlink.net>, mi**********@earthlink.net says...
<snip>
Several of those photos are crooked, because the only clear spot I
could find was contoured for drainage. I had to keep my cane in my left
hand, leaving me with one free hand for the camera & tripod. I am
trying to rebuild a used power chair, and build a joystick controlled
telescoping mast and camera mount to be able to take better pictures.
You should be able to photoshop the list out of those pictures pretty
easily. The first one is a nice shot.
--
Keith
Rick Decker rd*****@hamilton.edu posted to sci.electronics.design:
krw wrote:
>In article <qv********************************@4ax.com>,
do********@nowhere.net says...
>>On Mon, 08 Oct 2007 08:32:57 -0400, Rick Decker
<rd*****@hamilton.eduwrote:
I have an idea. Just delete sci.math from the alist and then you
can all get back on your hobby horses and continue to study Ohm's
law and Mho's law and Mike the Martyr's patriotism without my
sayso.
*Your* say-so?! Who is attempting censorship now? You're a
friggin' panty-waisted hypocritical moron.
Tell me, how much work is it to be dumber than a donkey?
Don't ask me, I never wrote that. Looks as Lester chimed in.
Go talk to him.
Regards,
Rick
Agreed. Festus sick has posted it several times.
Alvin Bruney [MVP] wrote:
can't we all just get along? group hug. group hug!
Yikes!!! This thread has been closed and replies have been disabled. Please start a new discussion. Similar topics
by: Jon Slaughter |
last post by:
Sorry for all the cross posting but I'm interesting in getting a serious
discussion about how usenet has become lately.
Many people are moving away from usenet because of all the spam and cooks...
|
by: CloudSolutions |
last post by:
Introduction:
For many beginners and individual users, requiring a credit card and email registration may pose a barrier when starting to use cloud servers. However, some cloud server providers now...
|
by: Faith0G |
last post by:
I am starting a new it consulting business and it's been a while since I setup a new website. Is wordpress still the best web based software for hosting a 5 page website? The webpages will be...
|
by: taylorcarr |
last post by:
A Canon printer is a smart device known for being advanced, efficient, and reliable. It is designed for home, office, and hybrid workspace use and can also be used for a variety of purposes. However,...
|
by: Charles Arthur |
last post by:
How do i turn on java script on a villaon, callus and itel keypad mobile phone
|
by: aa123db |
last post by:
Variable and constants
Use var or let for variables and const fror constants.
Var foo ='bar';
Let foo ='bar';const baz ='bar';
Functions
function $name$ ($parameters$) {
}
...
|
by: ryjfgjl |
last post by:
If we have dozens or hundreds of excel to import into the database, if we use the excel import function provided by database editors such as navicat, it will be extremely tedious and time-consuming...
|
by: ryjfgjl |
last post by:
In our work, we often receive Excel tables with data in the same format. If we want to analyze these data, it can be difficult to analyze them because the data is spread across multiple Excel files...
|
by: emmanuelkatto |
last post by:
Hi All, I am Emmanuel katto from Uganda. I want to ask what challenges you've faced while migrating a website to cloud.
Please let me know.
Thanks!
Emmanuel
|
by: BarryA |
last post by:
What are the essential steps and strategies outlined in the Data Structures and Algorithms (DSA) roadmap for aspiring data scientists? How can individuals effectively utilize this roadmap to progress...
| |
