class method static variable same across isntances?

[Jim Langston]

The output of the following program for me is:
Same
0 1 2

Which is what I want. I just want to confirm this is well defined behavior,
that a static local variable to a class function/method is the same instance
across classes.

#include <iostream>
#include <vector>

class Foo
{
public:
std::vector<int>& Data( )
{
static std::vector<intEmptyData;

return EmptyData;
}
int Bar()
{
static int Val = 0;
return Val++;
}

};

int main()
{
Foo Bar1;
Foo Bar2;
std::vector<int>& D1 = Bar1.Data( );
std::vector<int>& D2 = Bar2.Data( );

if ( &D1 == &D2 )
std::cout << "Same\n";
else
std::cout << "Different\n";

std::cout << Bar1.Bar() << " ";
std::cout << Bar2.Bar() << " ";
std::cout << Bar1.Bar();
return 0;
}

My actual usage will be to return an empty set in a tree like class if the
part is not found, but within that class I want to check to see if it was
found or not. I can see if it was found or not by comparing the pointers of
the returned reference to the local static.

[Ian Collins]

Jim Langston wrote:

The output of the following program for me is:
Same
0 1 2

Which is what I want. I just want to confirm this is well defined behavior,
that a static local variable to a class function/method is the same instance
across classes.

Yes, it is. Member functions are unique.

--
Ian Collins.

[Chris ( Val )]

On Oct 5, 9:26 am, "Jim Langston" <[e-mail]:

The output of the following program for me is:
Same
0 1 2

Which is what I want. I just want to confirm this is well defined behavior,
that a static local variable to a class function/method is the same instance
across classes.

#include <iostream>
#include <vector>

class Foo
{
public:
std::vector<int>& Data( )
{
static std::vector<intEmptyData;

return EmptyData;
}
int Bar()
{
static int Val = 0;
return Val++;
}

};

[snip]

Have you thought about deriving from a common base class?

E.g:

class Common
{
static std::vector<intEmptyData;

// ...

};

class Foo : public Common
{
// ...

If you want common functionality across all instances,
it might be worth looking into something like this.

--
Chris Val

[Jim Langston]

"Chris ( Val )" <ch******@gmail.comwrote in message
news:11**********************@57g2000hsv.googlegro ups.com...

On Oct 5, 9:26 am, "Jim Langston" <[e-mail]:

>The output of the following program for me is:
Same
0 1 2

Which is what I want. I just want to confirm this is well defined
behavior,
that a static local variable to a class function/method is the same
instance
across classes.

#include <iostream>
#include <vector>

class Foo
{
public:
std::vector<int>& Data( )
{
static std::vector<intEmptyData;

return EmptyData;
}
int Bar()
{
static int Val = 0;
return Val++;
}

};

[snip]

Have you thought about deriving from a common base class?

E.g:

class Common
{
static std::vector<intEmptyData;

// ...

};

class Foo : public Common
{
// ...

If you want common functionality across all instances,
it might be worth looking into something like this.

It's actually used in a method to return a reference to a set using a form
of recursion.

class PartIndex
{
public:
PartIndex( const std::string& Name = "Torso" ): Name_( Name ) {}
// Lot of other public methods used to populate Indicies_ and Parts_
std::set<size_t>& PartIndicies( const std::string& Name )
{
static std::set<size_tEmptySet;
EmptySet.clear();

if ( Name_ == Name )
{
return PartIndicies();
}
else
{
for ( std::vector<PartIndex>::iterator it = Parts_.begin(); it
!= Parts_.end(); ++it )
{
std::set<size_t>& ReturnSet = (*it).PartIndicies( Name );
if ( &ReturnSet != &EmptySet )
return ReturnSet;
}
return EmptySet;
}
}
private:
std::string Name_;
std::set<size_tIndicies_;
std::vector<PartIndexParts_;

};

My other option would be to use a try...catch block which I am not fond of
for using for something like this.

[Chris ( Val )]

On Oct 6, 2:32 pm, "Jim Langston" <[e-mail]:

"Chris ( Val )" <[e-mail] in messagenews:11**********************@57g2000hsv.go oglegroups.com...

On Oct 5, 9:26 am, "Jim Langston" <[e-mail]:

The output of the following program for me is:
Same
0 1 2

Which is what I want. I just want to confirm this is well defined
behavior,
that a static local variable to a class function/method is the same
instance
across classes.

#include <iostream>
#include <vector>

class Foo
{
public:
std::vector<int>& Data( )
{
static std::vector<intEmptyData;

return EmptyData;
}
int Bar()
{
static int Val = 0;
return Val++;
}

};

[snip]

Have you thought about deriving from a common base class?

E.g:

class Common
{
static std::vector<intEmptyData;

// ...

};

class Foo : public Common
{
// ...

If you want common functionality across all instances,
it might be worth looking into something like this.

It's actually used in a method to return a reference to a set using a form
of recursion.

[snipped code]

Ok, but how is the code you posted relevant to what I asked?

You posted an interest in finding out about a static retaining
its value across all instances of a class. I just wanted to put
forward the suggestion of using a common base class for such
things, to simplify your code and see what your thoughts were :-)

--
Chris Val

[Jim Langston]

"Chris ( Val )" <ch******@gmail.comwrote in message
news:11**********************@22g2000hsm.googlegro ups.com...

On Oct 6, 2:32 pm, "Jim Langston" <[e-mail]:

>"Chris ( Val )" <[e-mail] in
messagenews:11**********************@57g2000hsv.g ooglegroups.com...

On Oct 5, 9:26 am, "Jim Langston" <[e-mail]:
The output of the following program for me is:
Same
0 1 2

>Which is what I want. I just want to confirm this is well defined
behavior,
that a static local variable to a class function/method is the same
instance
across classes.

>#include <iostream>
#include <vector>

>class Foo
{
public:
std::vector<int>& Data( )
{
static std::vector<intEmptyData;

> return EmptyData;
}
int Bar()
{
static int Val = 0;
return Val++;
}

>};

[snip]

Have you thought about deriving from a common base class?

E.g:

class Common
{
static std::vector<intEmptyData;

// ...

};

class Foo : public Common
{
// ...

If you want common functionality across all instances,
it might be worth looking into something like this.

It's actually used in a method to return a reference to a set using a
form
of recursion.

[snipped code]

Ok, but how is the code you posted relevant to what I asked?

You posted an interest in finding out about a static retaining
its value across all instances of a class. I just wanted to put
forward the suggestion of using a common base class for such
things, to simplify your code and see what your thoughts were :-)

Well, my code shows how I am using the fact that a static is the same
instance across instances of the object. And how using a common base class
wouldn't help me in the least.