467,136 Members | 1,285 Online
Bytes | Developer Community
Ask Question

Home New Posts Topics Members FAQ

Post your question to a community of 467,136 developers. It's quick & easy.

Video: WTC Witnesses: "It was definitely no commercial airliner"

Before the official story of Islamic hijackers was fed to the press,
witnesses on the day in New York describe what they saw on 9/11:

"That was no American Airlines jet"

"It was a military plane"

"It was definitely no airliner"

Watch:
http://uk.youtube.com/watch?v=oVH5jm06pJY

Sep 13 '07 #1
  • viewed: 1386
Share:
9 Replies
On Sep 13, 2:57 pm, aaaaaaaadftdfgdfgdfgdfgd...@googlemail.com wrote:
Before the official story of Islamic hijackers was fed to the press,
witnesses on the day in New York describe what they saw on 9/11:

"That was no American Airlines jet"

"It was a military plane"

"It was definitely no airliner"

Watch:http://uk.youtube.com/watch?v=oVH5jm06pJY

If this is the case, does that mean someone took the hundreds of
people on those four commercial jets "involved" in the attacks and
murdered them at some unknown location?

And what is that strange-looking bulge on the bottom of the second
plane that hit the tower? Looks like an engine, but it can't be
because of the location on the fuselage.

Sep 13 '07 #2
aa*************************@googlemail.com wrote:
Before the official story of Islamic hijackers was fed to the press,
witnesses on the day in New York describe what they saw on 9/11:
Yes, because random witnesses are more reliable than what you see in
the videos.

How about:
http://video.google.com/videoplay?do...arch&plindex=5
Sep 13 '07 #3
Juha Nieminen wrote:
aa*************************@googlemail.com wrote:
>Before the official story of [..]

Yes, because [..]
In which of 'rec.arts.poems','comp.lang.c++','rec.equestrian',
'rec.arts.tv','misc.legal' is this on topic? Just curious...

V
--
Please remove capital 'A's when replying by e-mail
I do not respond to top-posted replies, please don't ask
Sep 13 '07 #4
People like that should be dumped into the sea.
Then we can say it was a conspiracy.
Sep 13 '07 #5
"That was no American Airlines jet"

This disinformation campaign is funded by Al-Qaeda, to draw attention away
from the Saudis.

--
Phlip
Sep 13 '07 #6

<aa*************************@googlemail.comwrote in message
news:11**********************@w3g2000hsg.googlegro ups.com...
Before the official story of Islamic hijackers was fed to the press,
witnesses on the day in New York describe what they saw on 9/11:

"That was American Airlines jet"

"It was not a military plane"

"It was definitely an airliner"

True, true

Sep 14 '07 #7
sc**********@yahoo.com wrote:
On Sep 13, 2:57 pm, aaaaaaaadftdfgdfgdfgdfgd...@googlemail.com wrote:
>>Before the official story of Islamic hijackers was fed to the press,
witnesses on the day in New York describe what they saw on 9/11:

"That was no American Airlines jet"

"It was a military plane"

"It was definitely no airliner"

Watch:http://uk.youtube.com/watch?v=oVH5jm06pJY

If this is the case, does that mean someone took the hundreds of
people on those four commercial jets "involved" in the attacks and
murdered them at some unknown location?

And what is that strange-looking bulge on the bottom of the second
plane that hit the tower? Looks like an engine, but it can't be
because of the location on the fuselage.
It's a special pod containing the bodies of the former passengers.
(They had to be found in the ultimate wreckage, you know.)

--
-------(m+
~/:o)_|
Gresham's Law is not worth a Continental.
http://scrawlmark.org
Sep 14 '07 #8
CaveDweller wrote:
People like that should be dumped into the sea.
Then we can say it was a conspiracy.

But it was done by conspiratowers.
You saw it yourself.

--
-------(m+
~/:o)_|
Gresham's Law is not worth a Continental.
http://scrawlmark.org
Sep 14 '07 #9
Phlip wrote:
>>"That was no American Airlines jet"


This disinformation campaign is funded by Al-Qaeda, to draw attention away
from the Saudis.
But they drew attention right back to themselves with the $80/bbl thingy.

--
-------(m+
~/:o)_|
Gresham's Law is not worth a Continental.
http://scrawlmark.org
Sep 14 '07 #10

This discussion thread is closed

Replies have been disabled for this discussion.

Similar topics

reply views Thread by R. Westermeyer | last post: by
reply views Thread by chris yoker via DotNetMonster.com | last post: by
By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.