const vector<A> vs vector<const A> vs const vector<const A>

[Javier]

Hello,
thanks for the replies to my questions.
I have one more:
class A
{
public:
m1() const;
m2();
};

is there any difference between

std::vector<const Av;
const std::vector<Av;
const std::vector<const Av;

and, what about:

A a1;
v.push_back(a1);
v[0].m1()
v[0].m2()

in the three cases?

[Neelesh Bodas]

On Sep 4, 10:53 pm, Javier <[e-mail]:

Hello,
thanks for the replies to my questions.
I have one more:
class A
{
public:
m1() const;

missing return value

m2();

missing return value;

>
};

is there any difference between

std::vector<const Av;

const std::vector<Av;

v is a const vector whose elements are of type A. Effectively,
v.push_back() (or any other operation that changes the vector) is not
allowed on v

const std::vector<const Av;

doesnot compile

>
and, what about:

A a1;
v.push_back(a1);
v[0].m1()
v[0].m2()

Talking about the 2nd case (const std::vector<Av), since v is a
const vector, non-const member functions cannot be called, const
member functions can be.

-N