Who might help me

[a.schoeni]

I got the folowing problem: www.pennergame.de/ref.php?uid=2925

[gw7rib]

On 13 Aug, 17:10, [e-mail] wrote:

I got the folowing problem: [Link removed]

The link took ages to open for me, and does not appear to be
describing a programming problem.

[Doug]

On Aug 13, 8:26 pm, [e-mail] wrote:

On 13 Aug, 17:10, [e-mail] wrote:

I got the folowing problem: [Link removed]

The link took ages to open for me, and does not appear to be
describing a programming problem.

Good god, man. Don't click on unknown links in random usenet
postings! goatse could be just around the corner...

[Mark McIntyre]

On Mon, 13 Aug 2007 09:10:29 -0700, in comp.lang.c , a.*******@gmx.de
wrote:

>I got the folowing problem: (url snipped)

If you really have a C proboem, post it here, not a link to some
potential spam website.

--
Mark McIntyre

"Debugging is twice as hard as writing the code in the first place.
Therefore, if you write the code as cleverly as possible, you are,
by definition, not smart enough to debug it."
--Brian Kernighan

[Richard]

Mark McIntyre <ma**********@spamcop.netwrites:

On Mon, 13 Aug 2007 09:10:29 -0700, in comp.lang.c , a.*******@gmx.de
wrote:

>>I got the folowing problem: (url snipped)

If you really have a C proboem, post it here, not a link to some
potential spam website.

Why would you reply to this spam and thus bring it out into the spools
of those of use with better prepared spam filters?

[Malcolm McLean]

"Richard" <rg****@gmail.comwrote in message
news:k7************@homelinux.net...

Mark McIntyre <ma**********@spamcop.netwrites:

>On Mon, 13 Aug 2007 09:10:29 -0700, in comp.lang.c , a.*******@gmx.de
wrote:

>>>I got the folowing problem: (url snipped)

If you really have a C proboem, post it here, not a link to some
potential spam website.

Why would you reply to this spam and thus bring it out into the spools
of those of use with better prepared spam filters?

It's not an obvious spam. I might well have clicked if not for the warning.

--
Free games and programming goodies.
http://www.personal.leeds.ac.uk/~bgy1mm

[Mark McIntyre]

On Mon, 13 Aug 2007 12:26:39 -0700, in comp.lang.c , gw****@aol.com
wrote:

>On 13 Aug, 17:10, [e-mail] wrote:

>I got the folowing problem: [Link removed]

The link took ages to open for me, and does not appear to be
describing a programming problem.

It probably took a long time for all the viruses and keyloggers to
download.

NEVER click on unprovenanced links in usenet, they're virtually
certain to lead to hostile websites.
--
Mark McIntyre

"Debugging is twice as hard as writing the code in the first place.
Therefore, if you write the code as cleverly as possible, you are,
by definition, not smart enough to debug it."
--Brian Kernighan

[Mark McIntyre]

On Mon, 13 Aug 2007 21:27:15 +0100, in comp.lang.c , "Malcolm McLean"
<re*******@btinternet.comwrote:

>
"Richard" <rg****@gmail.comwrote in message
news:k7************@homelinux.net...

>Why would you reply to this spam and thus bring it out into the spools
of those of use with better prepared spam filters?

Anyone with a tenth of a brain would have noticed that I removed the
URL, thus emasculating the probable spam. However you're a troll, so
no surprises there.

>It's not an obvious spam. I might well have clicked if not for the warning.

Indeed it might not be spam - some guy in germany might actually want
help.If the OP was really seeking assitance, he now knows to post here
properly.
--
Mark McIntyre

"Debugging is twice as hard as writing the code in the first place.
Therefore, if you write the code as cleverly as possible, you are,
by definition, not smart enough to debug it."
--Brian Kernighan

[Richard]

Mark McIntyre <ma**********@spamcop.netwrites:

On Mon, 13 Aug 2007 21:27:15 +0100, in comp.lang.c , "Malcolm McLean"
<re*******@btinternet.comwrote:

>>
"Richard" <rg****@gmail.comwrote in message
news:k7************@homelinux.net...

>>Why would you reply to this spam and thus bring it out into the spools
of those of use with better prepared spam filters?

Anyone with a tenth of a brain would have noticed that I removed the
URL, thus emasculating the probable spam. However you're a troll, so
no surprises there.

It's you that thinks people give a flying F about your opinion on
obvious spam posts. Ignore them, if your out of control ego lets you.

>

>>It's not an obvious spam. I might well have clicked if not for the warning.

Indeed it might not be spam - some guy in germany might actually want
help.If the OP was really seeking assitance, he now knows to post here
properly.

I think you over rate the importance given to your rude and abrupt
replies.

And just in case you are trying to pretend you were being helpful, here
is your reply to the OP:

,----
| If you really have a C proboem, post it here, not a link to some
| potential spam website.
`----

Grow up.

[Kelsey Bjarnason]

On Mon, 13 Aug 2007 12:46:59 -0700, Doug wrote:

On Aug 13, 8:26 pm, [e-mail] wrote:

>On 13 Aug, 17:10, [e-mail] wrote:

I got the folowing problem: [Link removed]

The link took ages to open for me, and does not appear to be describing
a programming problem.

Good god, man. Don't click on unknown links in random usenet postings!
goatse could be just around the corner...

goatse I can deal with. I can even deal with tubgirl. The ones that
snark me off are the ones where there's embedded sound, all too often set
at a volume level sufficient to make your ears bleed.

Screaming nuclear death to whoever came up with the bright idea of adding
audio support to web pages.

[sods]

On Aug 14, 3:46 am, Doug <[e-mail]:

On Aug 13, 8:26 pm, [e-mail] wrote:

On 13 Aug, 17:10, [e-mail] wrote:

I got the folowing problem: [Link removed]

The link took ages to open for me, and does not appear to be
describing a programming problem.

Good god, man. Don't click on unknown links in random usenet
postings! goatse could be just around the corner...

:), exactly, at least for me, i'll take care of this kind of link
and also person.
-sods

[Richard Heathfield]

Kelsey Bjarnason said:

<snip>

>
[...] The ones that
snark me off are the ones where there's embedded sound, all too often
set at a volume level sufficient to make your ears bleed.

Screaming nuclear death to whoever came up with the bright idea of
adding audio support to web pages.

If you're silly enough to fit speakers to your computer, you deserve all
you get - but surely they have an "off" switch?

--
Richard Heathfield <http://www.cpax.org.uk>
Email: -www. +rjh@
Google users: <http://www.cpax.org.uk/prg/writings/googly.php>
"Usenet is a strange place" - dmr 29 July 1999

[Richard Bos]

Kelsey Bjarnason <kb********@gmail.comwrote:

On Mon, 13 Aug 2007 12:46:59 -0700, Doug wrote:

Good god, man. Don't click on unknown links in random usenet postings!
goatse could be just around the corner...

goatse I can deal with. I can even deal with tubgirl. The ones that
snark me off are the ones where there's embedded sound, all too often set
at a volume level sufficient to make your ears bleed.

Screaming nuclear death to whoever came up with the bright idea of adding
audio support to web pages.

One word: Opera.

The real problem, btw, is joe-jobs, trojans, and other vile stuff of
such ilk. Opera lets you get around quite a lot of that, as well.

Richard

[Army1987]

On Mon, 13 Aug 2007 21:40:44 +0100, Mark McIntyre wrote:

On Mon, 13 Aug 2007 12:26:39 -0700, in comp.lang.c , gw****@aol.com
wrote:

>>On 13 Aug, 17:10, [e-mail] wrote:

>>I got the folowing problem: [Link removed]

The link took ages to open for me, and does not appear to be
describing a programming problem.

It probably took a long time for all the viruses and keyloggers to
download.

Nope, this one looks like one of those on-line role-playing games
in which you get some kind of points whenever someone gets on that
page with your uid. I think hey also send you cookies so that if a
person gets on that same page within the same day it won't count.

--
Army1987 (Replace "NOSPAM" with "email")
No-one ever won a game by resigning. -- S. Tartakower

[Kelsey Bjarnason]

[snips]

On Tue, 14 Aug 2007 06:48:49 +0000, Richard Bos wrote:

>Screaming nuclear death to whoever came up with the bright idea of adding
audio support to web pages.

One word: Opera.

The real problem, btw, is joe-jobs, trojans, and other vile stuff of
such ilk.

Not a big fan of opera, actually. Yeah, okay, it's quickish and all, but
something about it just bugs me. Sorta like Gnome - yes, fine, it works,
I can't fault it on merits, but it brings out the "ick factor" in me
regardless.

Don't know about joe jobs, but trojans... been a long time since I
particularly cared about those. Or viruses, spyware, etc, etc, etc.