I got a small programm on net...but there was different initialisation
that I saw...
It was as follows:
for ( i = ~0 ; i ; i>>=1);
right shift is ok..But what is meaned by " i = ~0 "...
26  1957 
Shraddha wrote:
I got a small programm on net...but there was different initialisation
that I saw...
It was as follows:
for ( i = ~0 ; i ; i>>=1);
right shift is ok..But what is meaned by " i = ~0 "...
Same as "i = -1;" I suppose.
--
Joe Wright
"Everything should be made as simple as possible, but not simpler."
--- Albert Einstein ---
"Shraddha" writes:
>I got a small programm on net...but there was different initialisation
that I saw...
It was as follows:
for ( i = ~0 ; i ; i>>=1);
right shift is ok..But what is meaned by " i = ~0 "...
Tilde is the one's complement operator. I would not think of that as
bulletproof code, the results might well be different on a one's complement
machine than they are on a two's complement machine. The result is
"negative zero" on a one's complement machine.
On Mon, 18 Jun 2007 20:28:36 -0400, Joe Wright
<jo********@comcast.netwrote:
>Shraddha wrote:
>I got a small programm on net...but there was different initialisation
that I saw...
It was as follows:
for ( i = ~0 ; i ; i>>=1);
right shift is ok..But what is meaned by " i = ~0 "...
Same as "i = -1;" I suppose.
Not on a 1's complement or a signed magnitude machine.
Remove del for email
osmium said:
<snip>
Tilde is the one's complement operator.
Actually, it's the ones' complement operator, because it complements
many ones. "Two's complement", however, is correct.
--
Richard Heathfield
"Usenet is a strange place" - dmr 29/7/1999 http://www.cpax.org.uk
email: rjh at the above domain, - www.
"Richard Heathfield" writes:
osmium said:
<snip>
>Tilde is the one's complement operator.
Actually, it's the ones' complement operator, because it complements
many ones. "Two's complement", however, is correct.
I don't know if that is some of that famous British humour or what. It is
the one's complement operator, it does *not* form a proper two's complement.
osmium said:
"Richard Heathfield" writes:
>osmium said:
<snip>
>>Tilde is the one's complement operator.
Actually, it's the ones' complement operator, because it complements
many ones. "Two's complement", however, is correct.
I don't know if that is some of that famous British humour or what.
Nope.
It is the one's complement operator,
No, it's the ones' complement operator. Observe the position of the
apostrophe. If you disagree, take it up with Knuth (TAOCP Vol 2,
Section 4.1).
it does *not* form a proper two's complement.
I didn't say it did. I was referring to your correct positioning of the
apostrophe in "two's complement", later in your article.
--
Richard Heathfield
"Usenet is a strange place" - dmr 29/7/1999 http://www.cpax.org.uk
email: rjh at the above domain, - www.
"Richard Heathfield" writes:
>
osmium said:
>
>"Richard Heathfield" writes:
>>osmium said:
<snip>
Tilde is the one's complement operator.
Actually, it's the ones' complement operator, because it complements
many ones. "Two's complement", however, is correct.
I don't know if that is some of that famous British humour or what.
Nope.
>It is the one's complement operator,
No, it's the ones' complement operator. Observe the position of the
apostrophe. If you disagree, take it up with Knuth (TAOCP Vol 2,
Section 4.1).
>it does *not* form a proper two's complement.
I didn't say it did. I was referring to your correct positioning of the
apostrophe in "two's complement", later in your article.
Some of your alleged humour is on a par with your food. If I had not
responded an innocent passerby who didn't try to parse your response, as I
did, could be misled badly.
osmium said:
"Richard Heathfield" writes:
>>
osmium said:
>>
>>"Richard Heathfield" writes:
osmium said:
<snip>
Tilde is the one's complement operator.
Actually, it's the ones' complement operator, because it
complements many ones. "Two's complement", however, is correct.
I don't know if that is some of that famous British humour or what.
Nope.
>>It is the one's complement operator,
No, it's the ones' complement operator. Observe the position of the
apostrophe. If you disagree, take it up with Knuth (TAOCP Vol 2,
Section 4.1).
>>it does *not* form a proper two's complement.
I didn't say it did. I was referring to your correct positioning of
the apostrophe in "two's complement", later in your article.
Some of your alleged humour is on a par with your food.
I say again, there is no humour intended here. I am being perfectly
serious. I don't know what amusement *you* see in this discussion, but
I'm not seeing any at all.
If I had not
responded an innocent passerby who didn't try to parse your response,
as I did, could be misled badly.
I don't see how. You said "Tilde is the one's complement operator" and I
replied "No, it's the ones' complement operator". The correction seems
plain enough to me.
If you think my correction is spurious, I invite you to check the Knuth
reference I gave.
--
Richard Heathfield
"Usenet is a strange place" - dmr 29/7/1999 http://www.cpax.org.uk
email: rjh at the above domain, - www.
"Richard Heathfield" wrote:
osmium said:
>"Richard Heathfield" writes:
>>>
osmium said:
>>>
"Richard Heathfield" writes:
osmium said:
>
<snip>
>
>Tilde is the one's complement operator.
>
Actually, it's the ones' complement operator, because it
complements many ones. "Two's complement", however, is correct.
I don't know if that is some of that famous British humour or what.
Nope.
It is the one's complement operator,
No, it's the ones' complement operator. Observe the position of the
apostrophe. If you disagree, take it up with Knuth (TAOCP Vol 2,
Section 4.1).
it does *not* form a proper two's complement.
I didn't say it did. I was referring to your correct positioning of
the apostrophe in "two's complement", later in your article.
Some of your alleged humour is on a par with your food.
I say again, there is no humour intended here. I am being perfectly
serious. I don't know what amusement *you* see in this discussion, but
I'm not seeing any at all.
>If I had not
responded an innocent passerby who didn't try to parse your response,
as I did, could be misled badly.
I don't see how. You said "Tilde is the one's complement operator" and I
replied "No, it's the ones' complement operator". The correction seems
plain enough to me.
If you think my correction is spurious, I invite you to check the Knuth
reference I gave.
It has nothing to do with the legitimacy of what you are saying. You know,
this English language is expressive enough to actually say what you mean
instead of hiding the meaning behind a veil. I see no point whatsoever in
being so subtle on such a thing, as I said, your initial post could easily
mislead someone.
FWIW, K&R spell it my way. My work is done here.
On 2007-06-19, osmium <r1********@comcast.netwrote:
"Shraddha" writes:
>>
for ( i = ~0 ; i ; i>>=1);
right shift is ok..But what is meaned by " i = ~0 "...
Tilde is the one's complement operator. I would not think of that as
bulletproof code, the results might well be different on a one's complement
machine than they are on a two's complement machine. The result is
"negative zero" on a one's complement machine.
Given the presence of the shift operator, I would have thought that it
is more important to the author that i has the all ones bit pattern
that it represents any particular number. For this reason ~0 is
initially a more logical choice than -1.
We don't know what i is, but whether the loop will terminates if it is
signed is implementation defined. If the implementation uses a two's
complement representation and the shift operator for signed ints on
the implementation does an arithmetic right shift (shifts in the sign
bit and leaves the sign bit unchanged) then the loop will not
terminate.
For this reason, if this is to be portable code, i should be unsigned.
If i is unsigned then -1 and ~0 are both equivalent as both are
guaranteed to represent 2^N - 1.
OK, the last paragraph isn't true :). Technically -1 and ~0U are
guaranteed to represent 2^N - 1 where N is the number of value bits
in the representation of unsigned int.
OK, the last paragraph isn't true :). If i is wider than an int
(supposed it is an unsigned long) then ~0UL is required. In general,
the constant 0 needs to be widened to the correct width before the ~
operator is applied.
osmium said:
"Richard Heathfield" wrote:
>osmium said:
<snip>
>>
>>If I had not
responded an innocent passerby who didn't try to parse your
response,
as I did, could be misled badly.
I don't see how. You said "Tilde is the one's complement operator"
and I replied "No, it's the ones' complement operator". The
correction seems plain enough to me.
If you think my correction is spurious, I invite you to check the
Knuth reference I gave.
It has nothing to do with the legitimacy of what you are saying. You
know, this English language is expressive enough to actually say what
you mean instead of hiding the meaning behind a veil. I see no point
whatsoever in being so subtle on such a thing
Nor do I. Had I intended to be subtle, I would have *been* subtle.
as I said, your initial post could easily mislead someone.
Only someone easily misled. Whilst I agree that there is no shortage of
such people, they probably wouldn't make very good C programmers
anyway.
FWIW, K&R spell it my way.
Fine, so submit a bug report.
My work is done here.
Er, okay, if you say so.
--
Richard Heathfield
"Usenet is a strange place" - dmr 29/7/1999 http://www.cpax.org.uk
email: rjh at the above domain, - www.
On Mon, 18 Jun 2007 20:06:48 -0700, in comp.lang.c , "osmium"
<r1********@comcast.netwrote:
>
Some of your alleged humour is on a par with your food.
I'm curious as to how often you've eaten at the Heathfield
household....
>If I had not
responded an innocent passerby who didn't try to parse your response, as I
did, could be misled badly.
I doubt it.
--
Mark McIntyre
"Debugging is twice as hard as writing the code in the first place.
Therefore, if you write the code as cleverly as possible, you are,
by definition, not smart enough to debug it."
--Brian Kernighan
On Mon, 18 Jun 2007 20:27:36 -0700, in comp.lang.c , "osmium"
<r1********@comcast.netwrote:
>FWIW, K&R spell it my way.
So ? That merely tells you the quality of proofreading. You would not
believe some of the dreck that my missus has had to send back to
alleged proofreaders.
--
Mark McIntyre
"Debugging is twice as hard as writing the code in the first place.
Therefore, if you write the code as cleverly as possible, you are,
by definition, not smart enough to debug it."
--Brian Kernighan
In article <PN******************************@bt.com>,
Richard Heathfield <rj*@see.sig.invalidwrote:
>Tilde is the one's complement operator.
>Actually, it's the ones' complement operator, because it complements
many ones.
Presumably you mean "with respect to many ones". At least, that's
what Knuth says, and I believe it's from him that this view derives.
>"Two's complement", however, is correct.
.... because, so it is claimed, it complements with respect to a single
power of two.
But I find this argument unconvincing. The apostrophe suggests that
they are complements *of* one and two, which they aren't. It would be
reasonably natural to refer to the one- or two-complement of a single
bit, and extended the terms unchanged to cover the multi-bit case.
But in any case the term "twos complement", regardless of apostrophe,
does not capture the key point of that representation. It is the
truncated form of the result of applying the usual binary arithmetic
to a conceptually infinite strings of bits. If you blindly subtract 1
from 0 in binary, you get ones all the way.
-- Richard
--
"Consideration shall be given to the need for as many as 32 characters
in some alphabets" - X3.4, 1963.
Richard Tobin said:
In article <PN******************************@bt.com>,
Richard Heathfield <rj*@see.sig.invalidwrote:
>>Tilde is the one's complement operator.
>>Actually, it's the ones' complement operator, because it complements
many ones.
Presumably you mean "with respect to many ones".
Call me Mr I Didn't Get Any Sleep Last Night. You're right - that's what
I meant.
At least, that's
what Knuth says, and I believe it's from him that this view derives.
Quite so.
>
>>"Two's complement", however, is correct.
... because, so it is claimed, it complements with respect to a single
power of two.
But I find this argument unconvincing.
Well, then, I can only suggest that you attempt to claim your $2.56 from
DEK. :-)
--
Richard Heathfield
"Usenet is a strange place" - dmr 29/7/1999 http://www.cpax.org.uk
email: rjh at the above domain, - www.
Joe Wright wrote:
Shraddha wrote:
>I got a small programm on net...but there was different
initialisation that I saw...
It was as follows:
for ( i = ~0 ; i ; i>>=1);
right shift is ok..But what is meaned by " i = ~0 "...
Same as "i = -1;" I suppose.
Nope. The effect will depend on the number representation, and is
thus not constant. Bad.
--
<http://www.cs.auckland.ac.nz/~pgut001/pubs/vista_cost.txt>
<http://www.securityfocus.com/columnists/423>
<http://www.aaxnet.com/editor/edit043.html>
cbfalconer at maineline dot net
--
Posted via a free Usenet account from http://www.teranews.com
In article <j3********************************@4ax.com>,
Mark McIntyre <ma**********@spamcop.netwrote:
>On Mon, 18 Jun 2007 20:06:48 -0700, in comp.lang.c , "osmium"
<r1********@comcast.netwrote:
>>
Some of your alleged humour is on a par with your food.
I'm curious as to how often you've eaten at the Heathfield
household....
If the food is as good as the humour, I should definitely make plans to
do so in the (unlikely) event I'm ever on that side of the world.
dave
--
Dave Vandervies dj******@csclub.uwaterloo.ca
>I can certainly imagine C370 programmers living in their own world.
It's very dark in there, too; no windows...
--Lawrence Kirby and Richard Heathfield in comp.lang.c dj******@csclub.uwaterloo.ca (Dave Vandervies) writes:
In article <j3********************************@4ax.com>,
Mark McIntyre <ma**********@spamcop.netwrote:
>>On Mon, 18 Jun 2007 20:06:48 -0700, in comp.lang.c , "osmium"
<r1********@comcast.netwrote:
>>>Some of your alleged humour is on a par with your food.
I'm curious as to how often you've eaten at the Heathfield
household....
If the food is as good as the humour, I should definitely make plans to
do so in the (unlikely) event I'm ever on that side of the world.
If his food is like his humo[u]r, I fear it may be too dry.
--
Keith Thompson (The_Other_Keith) ks***@mib.org <http://www.ghoti.net/~kst>
San Diego Supercomputer Center <* <http://users.sdsc.edu/~kst>
"We must do something. This is something. Therefore, we must do this."
-- Antony Jay and Jonathan Lynn, "Yes Minister"
Barry Schwarz wrote:
On Mon, 18 Jun 2007 20:28:36 -0400, Joe Wright
<jo********@comcast.netwrote:
>Shraddha wrote:
>>I got a small programm on net...but there was different initialisation
that I saw...
It was as follows:
for ( i = ~0 ; i ; i>>=1);
right shift is ok..But what is meaned by " i = ~0 "...
Same as "i = -1;" I suppose.
Not on a 1's complement or a signed magnitude machine.
Of course but these machines imaginary aren't they?
--
Joe Wright
"Everything should be made as simple as possible, but not simpler."
--- Albert Einstein ---
osmium wrote:
"Richard Heathfield" writes:
> osmium said:
>>"Richard Heathfield" writes:
osmium said:
<snip>
Tilde is the one's complement operator.
Actually, it's the ones' complement operator, because it
complements many ones. "Two's complement", however, is correct.
I don't know if that is some of that famous British humour or
what.
Nope.
>>It is the one's complement operator,
No, it's the ones' complement operator. Observe the position of
the apostrophe. If you disagree, take it up with Knuth (TAOCP
Vol 2, Section 4.1).
>>it does *not* form a proper two's complement.
I didn't say it did. I was referring to your correct positioning
of the apostrophe in "two's complement", later in your article.
Some of your alleged humour is on a par with your food. If I had
not responded an innocent passerby who didn't try to parse your
response, as I did, could be misled badly.
What humor? I think he is perfectly serious. Grammar counts.
--
<http://www.cs.auckland.ac.nz/~pgut001/pubs/vista_cost.txt>
<http://www.securityfocus.com/columnists/423>
<http://www.aaxnet.com/editor/edit043.html>
cbfalconer at maineline dot net
--
Posted via a free Usenet account from http://www.teranews.com
Joe Wright wrote:
Barry Schwarz wrote:
><jo********@comcast.netwrote:
>>Shraddha wrote:
.... snip ...
>>>>
right shift is ok..But what is meaned by " i = ~0 "...
Same as "i = -1;" I suppose.
Not on a 1's complement or a signed magnitude machine.
Of course but these machines imaginary aren't they?
To the same extent that -1 is.
--
<http://www.cs.auckland.ac.nz/~pgut001/pubs/vista_cost.txt>
<http://www.securityfocus.com/columnists/423>
<http://www.aaxnet.com/editor/edit043.html>
cbfalconer at maineline dot net
--
Posted via a free Usenet account from http://www.teranews.com
CBFalconer wrote:
Joe Wright wrote:
>Barry Schwarz wrote:
>><jo********@comcast.netwrote:
Shraddha wrote:
... snip ...
>>>>right shift is ok..But what is meaned by " i = ~0 "...
>
Same as "i = -1;" I suppose.
Not on a 1's complement or a signed magnitude machine.
Of course but these machines imaginary aren't they?
To the same extent that -1 is.
This is a very tough room. Let me try again. The question..
"what is meaned by " i = ~0 "..." might translate to..
int i = ~0;
...What goes on here?
The 0 of course in an integer value with all bits 0. The prefix tilde
performs a binary complement of the value, in this case to all bits 1.
The value of 'all bits 1' depends on how you look at it.
Two's complement suggests -1.
One's complement suggests -0.
Signed Magnitude maybe minus INT_MAX?
--
Joe Wright
"Everything should be made as simple as possible, but not simpler."
--- Albert Einstein ---
On Tue, 19 Jun 2007 13:29:20 -0400, in comp.lang.c , Joe Wright
<jo********@comcast.netwrote:
>Barry Schwarz wrote:
>Not on a 1's complement or a signed magnitude machine.
Of course but these machines imaginary aren't they?
Well, certainly some of them are now extraterrestrial http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Apollo_Guidance_Computer
while others appeared out of the blue, as it were... http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/IBM_7090
--
Mark McIntyre
"Debugging is twice as hard as writing the code in the first place.
Therefore, if you write the code as cleverly as possible, you are,
by definition, not smart enough to debug it."
--Brian Kernighan
Joe Wright wrote:
CBFalconer wrote:
>Joe Wright wrote:
>>Barry Schwarz wrote:
<jo********@comcast.netwrote:
Shraddha wrote:
... snip ...
>>>>>right shift is ok..But what is meaned by " i = ~0 "...
>>
Same as "i = -1;" I suppose.
Not on a 1's complement or a signed magnitude machine.
Of course but these machines imaginary aren't they?
To the same extent that -1 is.
This is a very tough room. Let me try again. The question..
"what is meaned by " i = ~0 "..." might translate to..
int i = ~0;
Who says i is declared as int? The original poster didn't, as far as I've
seen. If i is not declared as int, it is important to remember than ~0 is
evaluated as type int (the type of 0), and the result is converted to the
type of i. That is,
unsigned i = ~0;
is not equivalent to
unsigned i = 0;
i = ~i;
even though in this case, for two's complement, the result will be the same.
..What goes on here?
The 0 of course in an integer value with all bits 0. The prefix tilde
performs a binary complement of the value, in this case to all bits 1.
The value of 'all bits 1' depends on how you look at it.
Two's complement suggests -1.
Yes.
One's complement suggests -0.
As was mentioned elsethread, it's called "ones' complement".
-0 is never negative zero. If negative zero is supported, it will compare
equal to plain zero, but you don't get negative zero as a result of any
non-bitwise arithmetic operation, including negation. -0 is equivalent to
+0 .
And ones' complement systems are allowed to say the behaviour is undefined
if ~0 is evaluated. Negative zero need not be supported, and if it is not,
then all bits set is a trap representation.
Signed Magnitude maybe minus INT_MAX?
It's called "sign and magnitude", but right. Which of course equals INT_MIN
for these systems.
Joe Wright wrote:
Barry Schwarz wrote:
>On Mon, 18 Jun 2007 20:28:36 -0400, Joe Wright
<jo********@comcast.netwrote:
>>Shraddha wrote:
I got a small programm on net...but there was different initialisation
that I saw...
It was as follows:
for ( i = ~0 ; i ; i>>=1);
right shift is ok..But what is meaned by " i = ~0 "...
Same as "i = -1;" I suppose.
Not on a 1's complement or a signed magnitude machine.
Of course but these machines imaginary aren't they?
Of course they are. Completely imaginary. And THAT'S
why the committees who wrote and revised the Standards made
allowance for them. Even when they tightened the allowable
representations in C99, they still allowed ones' complement
and signed magnitude. Simply decreeing two's complement
would have made a lot of things simpler, but the committees
were made up entirely of masochists who loved to make trouble
for themselves. That's why you needn't worry your pretty
little head about it: All the world is a two's complement
32-bit Little-Endian IEEE-floating-point dosbox, and don't
let anyone tell you any different.
Or to put it another way: A friend of mine likes to say
that computing is a fashion-driven industry. Fashions come,
and fashions go, and fashions come again. You can write your
program for this season's hem lines and color schemes, or you
can attempt something a little less transitory. There are,
after all, some distinct infelicities in two's complement:
the fact that abs(n) cannot be implemented reliably stands
out as an ugliness that neither of the alternatives suffer
from, and tomorrow's system couturier may reject that ugliness.
Trap representations for integers are Out today, but in the
face of viral onslaught might not tomorrow's machine revive
the old practice of explicitly-typed data?
Sometimes it doesn't make sense to sacrifice all other goals
on the altar of portability: Portability is just one among many
desirable attributes of a program. But there are *very* few
reasons to engage in gratuitous importabilities like those(?)
in the above code example. You may not particularly like the
ruffles-with-polka-dots theme that all the designers will put
on the runways next year, but it costs you little or nothing
to accommodate it -- and if you don't, none of the hot models
will wear your code.
--
Eric Sosman es*****@acm-dot-org.invalid
Eric Sosman <es*****@acm-dot-org.invalidwrote:
Or to put it another way: A friend of mine likes to say
that computing is a fashion-driven industry. Fashions come,
and fashions go, and fashions come again. You can write your
program for this season's hem lines and color schemes, or you
can attempt something a little less transitory. There are,
after all, some distinct infelicities in two's complement:
the fact that abs(n) cannot be implemented reliably stands
out as an ugliness that neither of the alternatives suffer
from, and tomorrow's system couturier may reject that ugliness.
Trap representations for integers are Out today, but in the
face of viral onslaught might not tomorrow's machine revive
the old practice of explicitly-typed data?
Mind you, for the fashion industry it seems to be lucrative to work only
to today's fashion, and let the airheaded customers buy each year's
fashion in turn. It doesn't seem to do Microsoft any harm, either.
Whether that is a business model you wish to strive for is on each
programmer's own conscience. But lucrative it is.
Richard This thread has been closed and replies have been disabled. Please start a new discussion. Similar topics
by: Sarah Tanembaum |
last post by:
Beside its an opensource and supported by community, what's the fundamental
differences between PostgreSQL and those high-price commercial database (and
some are bloated such as Oracle) from...
|
by: Jukka K. Korpela |
last post by:
I have noticed that the meaning of visibility: collapse has been discussed
on different forums, but with no consensus on what it really means.
Besides, implementations differ.
The specification...
|
by: Michael Kalina |
last post by:
Because when I asked for comments on my site-design (Remember? My site,
your opinion!) some of you told me never to change anything on
font-sizes!
What do you guys think of that:...
|
by: lester |
last post by:
a pre-beginner's question:
what is the pros and cons of .net, compared to ++
I am wondering what can I get if I continue to learn C# after I have learned
C --> C++ --> C# ??
I think there...
|
by: Steve Richter |
last post by:
What does the "." mean in the following sql script stmts?
use
GO
if exists (select * from dbo.sysobjects where
id = object_id(N'.')
and OBJECTPROPERTY(id,N'IsUserTable') = 1)
drop table ....
|
by: typingcat |
last post by:
First of all, I'm an Asian and I need to input Japanese, Korean and so
on. I've tried many PHP IDEs today, but almost non of them supported
Unicode (UTF-8) file.
I've found that the only Unicode...
|
by: jacob navia |
last post by:
I would like to add at the beginning of the C tutorial I am writing
a short blurb about what "types" are. I came up with the following text.
Please can you comment?
Did I miss something?
Is...
|
by: Frank Rizzo |
last post by:
Some of the classes in the framework are marked as thread-safe in the
documentation. In particular the docs say the following:
"Any public static (*Shared* in Visual Basic) members of this type...
|
by: Jason Huang |
last post by:
Hi,
Would someone explain the following coding more detail for me? What's the
( ) for?
CurrentText = (TextBox)e.Item.Cells.Controls;
Thanks.
Jason
|
by: JoeC |
last post by:
m_iWidth = (int)pBitmapInfo->bmiHeader.biWidth;
m_iHeight = (int)pBitmapInfo->bmiHeader.biHeight;
What does this mean?
I have seen v=&var->member.thing;
but what does it mean when you...
|
by: emmanuelkatto |
last post by:
Hi All, I am Emmanuel katto from Uganda. I want to ask what challenges you've faced while migrating a website to cloud.
Please let me know.
Thanks!
Emmanuel
|
by: BarryA |
last post by:
What are the essential steps and strategies outlined in the Data Structures and Algorithms (DSA) roadmap for aspiring data scientists? How can individuals effectively utilize this roadmap to progress...
|
by: nemocccc |
last post by:
hello, everyone, I want to develop a software for my android phone for daily needs, any suggestions?
|
by: marktang |
last post by:
ONU (Optical Network Unit) is one of the key components for providing high-speed Internet services. Its primary function is to act as an endpoint device located at the user's premises. However,...
|
by: Hystou |
last post by:
Most computers default to English, but sometimes we require a different language, especially when relocating. Forgot to request a specific language before your computer shipped? No problem! You can...
|
by: Oralloy |
last post by:
Hello folks,
I am unable to find appropriate documentation on the type promotion of bit-fields when using the generalised comparison operator "<=>".
The problem is that using the GNU compilers,...
|
by: jinu1996 |
last post by:
In today's digital age, having a compelling online presence is paramount for businesses aiming to thrive in a competitive landscape. At the heart of this digital strategy lies an intricately woven...
|
by: Hystou |
last post by:
Overview:
Windows 11 and 10 have less user interface control over operating system update behaviour than previous versions of Windows. In Windows 11 and 10, there is no way to turn off the Windows...
|
by: agi2029 |
last post by:
Let's talk about the concept of autonomous AI software engineers and no-code agents. These AIs are designed to manage the entire lifecycle of a software development project—planning, coding, testing,...
| |
