I frequently interface with API's that require one to "clear out" a
POD structure (some people choose memset or equivalent for this), then
fill in a set of relevant fields based on the type of function call
the struct is being used for. Would method (a) or (b) below be more
appropriate and will there be a difference technically speaking,
keeping in mind this is POD? I also included a third method (c)
wondering if it is good practice or not for cases where the structure
begins with a field that needs initialized with the size of the
structure:
API_STRUC a = {0};
API_STRUC b = {};
API_STRUC c = {sizeof c};
....fill in a few fields...
api_func(&a); // or b or c
So anyway which would you use (a, b, c), if any, and why? 7 1875
440...@email.com a scris:
I frequently interface with API's that require one to "clear out" a
POD structure (some people choose memset or equivalent for this), then
fill in a set of relevant fields based on the type of function call
the struct is being used for. Would method (a) or (b) below be more
appropriate and will there be a difference technically speaking,
keeping in mind this is POD? I also included a third method (c)
wondering if it is good practice or not for cases where the structure
begins with a field that needs initialized with the size of the
structure:
API_STRUC a = {0};
API_STRUC b = {};
API_STRUC c = {sizeof c};
...fill in a few fields...
api_func(&a); // or b or c
So anyway which would you use (a, b, c), if any, and why?
If we are talking about an array: int a[xx] then the a. method is the
prefered. That way, all the elements will be initialized with 0, where
in b. there is undefined value.
asterisc wrote :
440...@email.com a scris:
>I frequently interface with API's that require one to "clear out" a POD structure (some people choose memset or equivalent for this), then fill in a set of relevant fields based on the type of function call the struct is being used for. Would method (a) or (b) below be more appropriate and will there be a difference technically speaking, keeping in mind this is POD? I also included a third method (c) wondering if it is good practice or not for cases where the structure begins with a field that needs initialized with the size of the structure:
API_STRUC a = {0}; API_STRUC b = {}; API_STRUC c = {sizeof c};
...fill in a few fields...
api_func(&a); // or b or c
So anyway which would you use (a, b, c), if any, and why?
If we are talking about an array: int a[xx] then the a. method is the
prefered. That way, all the elements will be initialized with 0, where
in b. there is undefined value.
Nonsense, 8.5.1/7:
If there are fewer initializers in the list than there are members in
the aggregate, then each member not explicitly initialized shall be
value-initialized
- Sylvester
Sylvester Hesp wrote:
asterisc wrote :
>440...@email.com a scris:
>>I frequently interface with API's that require one to "clear out" a POD structure (some people choose memset or equivalent for this), then fill in a set of relevant fields based on the type of function call the struct is being used for. Would method (a) or (b) below be more appropriate and will there be a difference technically speaking, keeping in mind this is POD? I also included a third method (c) wondering if it is good practice or not for cases where the structure begins with a field that needs initialized with the size of the structure:
API_STRUC a = {0}; API_STRUC b = {}; API_STRUC c = {sizeof c};
...fill in a few fields...
api_func(&a); // or b or c
So anyway which would you use (a, b, c), if any, and why?
If we are talking about an array: int a[xx] then the a. method is the prefered. That way, all the elements will be initialized with 0, where in b. there is undefined value.
Nonsense, 8.5.1/7:
If there are fewer initializers in the list than there are members in
the aggregate, then each member not explicitly initialized shall be
value-initialized
My habit of supplying the zero for value-initialising aggregates has
two roots: one was the bug in a well-knon compiler that couldn't get
the empty curly braces right, the other was style - I want the reader
to know that it's the zero that gets put there (at least for POD it
is).
V
--
Please remove capital 'A's when replying by e-mail
I do not respond to top-posted replies, please don't ask
Victor Bazarov wrote :
Sylvester Hesp wrote:
>asterisc wrote :
>>440...@email.com a scris: I frequently interface with API's that require one to "clear out" a POD structure (some people choose memset or equivalent for this), then fill in a set of relevant fields based on the type of function call the struct is being used for. Would method (a) or (b) below be more appropriate and will there be a difference technically speaking, keeping in mind this is POD? I also included a third method (c) wondering if it is good practice or not for cases where the structure begins with a field that needs initialized with the size of the structure:
API_STRUC a = {0}; API_STRUC b = {}; API_STRUC c = {sizeof c};
...fill in a few fields...
api_func(&a); // or b or c
So anyway which would you use (a, b, c), if any, and why?
If we are talking about an array: int a[xx] then the a. method is the prefered. That way, all the elements will be initialized with 0, where in b. there is undefined value.
Nonsense, 8.5.1/7: If there are fewer initializers in the list than there are members in the aggregate, then each member not explicitly initialized shall be value-initialized
My habit of supplying the zero for value-initialising aggregates has
two roots: one was the bug in a well-knon compiler that couldn't get
the empty curly braces right
VC++ 6.0, IIRC? Anyone still using that crappy compiler should be shot
;). Seriously though, that is a fair point.
the other was style - I want the reader to know that it's the zero that gets
put there (at least for POD it is).
This is debatable. Just as with empty parantheses in member
initializations, empty braces could just as well be interpreted as
value-initialization. Personally, I make the distinction on whether the
initializer is specified or not - if you do not want the aggregate to
be initialized, you should omit the initializer anyway, so if it's
there, it means initialize with zeroes (for POD members that is),
whether it's empty or contains a single zero.
- Sylvester
On 24 May 2007 04:54:15 -0700, 44****@email.com wrote:
>I frequently interface with API's that require one to "clear out" a POD structure
API_STRUC a = {0}; API_STRUC b = {}; API_STRUC c = {sizeof c};
How about :
API_STRUC d = API_STRUC();
--
Roland Pibinger
"The best software is simple, elegant, and full of drama" - Grady Booch
On 2007-05-24 05:00:35 -0700, asterisc <Ra*******@ni.comsaid:
>
440...@email.com a scris:
>I frequently interface with API's that require one to "clear out" a POD structure (some people choose memset or equivalent for this), then fill in a set of relevant fields based on the type of function call the struct is being used for. Would method (a) or (b) below be more appropriate and will there be a difference technically speaking, keeping in mind this is POD? I also included a third method (c) wondering if it is good practice or not for cases where the structure begins with a field that needs initialized with the size of the structure:
API_STRUC a = {0}; API_STRUC b = {}; API_STRUC c = {sizeof c};
...fill in a few fields...
api_func(&a); // or b or c
So anyway which would you use (a, b, c), if any, and why?
If we are talking about an array: int a[xx] then the a. method is the
prefered. That way, all the elements will be initialized with 0, where
in b. there is undefined value.
That is simply not true. a and b are equivalent.
--
Clark S. Cox III cl*******@gmail.com
On May 25, 2:31 am, rpbg...@yahoo.com (Roland Pibinger) wrote:
On 24 May 2007 04:54:15 -0700, 440...@email.com wrote:
API_STRUC a = {0};
How about:
API_STRUC d = API_STRUC();
Wasn't it only added in C++03 that this syntax
causes zero-initialization in PODs? I wouldn't
like to rely on a compiler to get that right. This thread has been closed and replies have been disabled. Please start a new discussion. Similar topics
by: William C. White |
last post by:
Does anyone know of a way to use PHP /w Authorize.net AIM without using
cURL? Our website is hosted on a shared drive and the webhost company
doesn't installed additional software (such as cURL)...
|
by: Albert Ahtenberg |
last post by:
Hello,
I don't know if it is only me but I was sure that header("Location:url")
redirects the browser instantly to URL, or at least stops the execution of
the code. But appearantely it continues...
|
by: James |
last post by:
Hi,
I have a form with 2 fields.
'A'
'B'
The user completes one of the fields and the form is submitted.
On the results page I want to run a query, but this will change
subject to which...
|
by: Ollivier Robert |
last post by:
Hello,
I'm trying to link PHP with Oracle 9.2.0/OCI8 with gcc 3.2.3 on a Solaris9
system. The link succeeds but everytime I try to run php, I get a SEGV from
inside the libcnltsh.so library.
...
|
by: Richard Galli |
last post by:
I want viewers to compare state laws on a single subject.
Imagine a three-column table with a drop-down box on the top. A viewer
selects a state from the list, and that state's text fills the...
|
by: Albert Ahtenberg |
last post by:
Hello,
I have two questions.
1. When the user presses the back button and returns to a form he filled
the form is reseted. How do I leave there the values he inserted?
2. When the...
|
by: inderjit S Gabrie |
last post by:
Hi all
Here is the scenerio ...is it possibly to do this...
i am getting valid course dates output on to a web which i have designed
....all is okay so far , look at the following web url
...
|
by: Jack |
last post by:
Hi All,
What is the PHP equivilent of Oracle bind variables in a SQL statement, e.g.
select x from y where z=:parameter
Which in asp/jsp would be followed by some statements to bind a value...
|
by: Sandwick |
last post by:
I am trying to change the size of a drawing so they are all 3x3.
the script below is what i was trying to use to cut it in half ... I
get errors.
I can display the normal picture but not the...
|
by: DolphinDB |
last post by:
The formulas of 101 quantitative trading alphas used by WorldQuant were presented in the paper 101 Formulaic Alphas. However, some formulas are complex, leading to challenges in calculation.
Take...
|
by: ryjfgjl |
last post by:
ExcelToDatabase: batch import excel into database automatically...
|
by: isladogs |
last post by:
The next Access Europe meeting will be on Wednesday 6 Mar 2024 starting at 18:00 UK time (6PM UTC) and finishing at about 19:15 (7.15PM).
In this month's session, we are pleased to welcome back...
|
by: Vimpel783 |
last post by:
Hello!
Guys, I found this code on the Internet, but I need to modify it a little. It works well, the problem is this: Data is sent from only one cell, in this case B5, but it is necessary that data...
|
by: jfyes |
last post by:
As a hardware engineer, after seeing that CEIWEI recently released a new tool for Modbus RTU Over TCP/UDP filtering and monitoring, I actively went to its official website to take a look. It turned...
|
by: ArrayDB |
last post by:
The error message I've encountered is; ERROR:root:Error generating model response: exception: access violation writing 0x0000000000005140, which seems to be indicative of an access violation...
|
by: PapaRatzi |
last post by:
Hello,
I am teaching myself MS Access forms design and Visual Basic. I've created a table to capture a list of Top 30 singles and forms to capture new entries. The final step is a form (unbound)...
|
by: CloudSolutions |
last post by:
Introduction:
For many beginners and individual users, requiring a credit card and email registration may pose a barrier when starting to use cloud servers. However, some cloud server providers now...
|
by: Defcon1945 |
last post by:
I'm trying to learn Python using Pycharm but import shutil doesn't work
| |