#if defined

[Dave]

Is the construct #if defined MACRO_NAME part of standard C++?

If so, how does it differ from #ifdef?

Thanks!

[Martin Magnusson]

Dave wrote:

Is the construct #if defined MACRO_NAME part of standard C++?

If so, how does it differ from #ifdef?

From what I could gather from a fairly quick web search, "#ifdef XX"
and "#if defined (XX)" are exactly equivalent.

/ martin

[Pete Becker]

Dave wrote:

Is the construct #if defined MACRO_NAME part of standard C++?

If so, how does it differ from #ifdef?

Yes, it's part of standard C++ as well as standard C. To see the
difference, try writing something that depends on having more than one
macro defined.

--

Pete Becker
Dinkumware, Ltd. (http://www.dinkumware.com)

[jeffc]

"Dave" <be***********@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:vp************@news.supernews.com...

Is the construct #if defined MACRO_NAME part of standard C++?

If so, how does it differ from #ifdef?

Yes, you can use either I think. You can choose
#ifdef
#if defined
#ifndef
#if !defined
I see no mention of "defined" in Stroustrup's C++ Programming Language 3rd
ed. It's a bit more sophisticated in terms of logic, since you can write
things like
#if defined (macro1) || !defined (macro2) || defined (macro3)

[Unforgiven]

"Dave" <be***********@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:vp************@news.supernews.com...

Is the construct #if defined MACRO_NAME part of standard C++?
As far as I know, yes.
If so, how does it differ from #ifdef?

It doesn't really differ much. #ifdef is shorthand for #if defined.

I tend to use the latter when I have to combine more than one #if, like
this:
#if defined(_MSC_VER) && _MSC_VER < 1300

--
Unforgiven

Here siggie siggie siggie!