visual inheritance

[anat]

the following is a theoretical question, this code does not compile in
visual c++ so
my question is, considering c++ virtual inheritance mechanism how many
copies of V is D suppose to have?

class V{virtual f()};
class B1:public virtual V{...};
class B2:public virtual V{...};
class C:public B2, public virtual V{...};
class D: public virtual B1,public virtual B2,public virtual C{...},public
V{...};

thank you
Liz

[White Wolf]

anat wrote:

the following is a theoretical question, this code does not compile in
visual c++ so
my question is, considering c++ virtual inheritance mechanism how
many copies of V is D suppose to have?

One. That is the whole idea.

--
WW aka Attila

[Pete Becker]

anat wrote:

the following is a theoretical question, this code does not compile in
visual c++ so
my question is, considering c++ virtual inheritance mechanism how many
copies of V is D suppose to have?

class V{virtual f()};
class B1:public virtual V{...};
class B2:public virtual V{...};
class C:public B2, public virtual V{...};
class D: public virtual B1,public virtual B2,public virtual C{...},public
V{...};

Two. One virtual (inherited from the various bases) and one non-virtual.

--

Pete Becker
Dinkumware, Ltd. (http://www.dinkumware.com)

[White Wolf]

Pete Becker wrote:

anat wrote:

the following is a theoretical question, this code does not compile
in visual c++ so
my question is, considering c++ virtual inheritance mechanism how
many copies of V is D suppose to have?

class V{virtual f()};
class B1:public virtual V{...};
class B2:public virtual V{...};
class C:public B2, public virtual V{...};
class D: public virtual B1,public virtual B2,public virtual
C{...},public V{...};

Two. One virtual (inherited from the various bases) and one
non-virtual.

Ahh! I have missed that public V. There is a {} before it, that made me
think this is the end of the declaration of the base classes. And I am not
mistaking it will do that to a compiler, too. :-)

--
WW aka Attila

[Percy]

On Mon, 15 Sep 2003 00:36:52 +0200 in comp.lang.c++ :

I took the liberty to change your example to below:

class V{
public:
V() { std::cout << "V\n"; }//virtual int f();
};
class B1:public virtual V
{
public:
B1() { std::cout << "B1\n"; }

};
class B2:public virtual V
{
public:
B2() { std::cout << "B2\n"; }
};
class C:public B2, public virtual V
{
public:
C() { std::cout << "C\n"; }
};
class D:public virtual B1,public virtual B2,
public virtual C,public V
{
public:
D() { std::cout << "D\n"; }
};
int main()
{
D d;
return 0;
}

compiler results:
warning: direct base `B2' inaccessible in `D'
due to ambiguity
warning: direct base `V' inaccessible in `D'
due to ambiguity
output:

V
B1
B2
B2
C
V
D