About the -rdynamic flag

[parag_paul]

hi all,
according to the defintion it seems that the dynamic symbol table will
normally not load all he symbols in the symbol table. With rdynamic it
does to all,
What is the algorithm to generate the dynamic symbol table? or can you
please forward me some documents regarding that

[Kenny McCormack]

In article <11**********************@p15g2000hsd.googlegroups .com>,
pa********@hotmail.com <pa********@hotmail.comwrote:

>hi all,
according to the defintion it seems that the dynamic symbol table will
normally not load all he symbols in the symbol table. With rdynamic it
does to all,
What is the algorithm to generate the dynamic symbol table? or can you
please forward me some documents regarding that

Off topic. Not portable. Cant discuss it here. Blah, blah, blah.

Useful clc-related links:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Aspergers
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Clique
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/C_programming_language

[Chris Dollin]

pa********@hotmail.com wrote:

hi all,
according to the defintion it seems that the dynamic symbol table will
normally not load all he symbols in the symbol table. With rdynamic it
does to all,
What is the algorithm to generate the dynamic symbol table? or can you
please forward me some documents regarding that

Standard C doesn't have a "dynamic symbol table". You're better off
asking in a group that supports your particular implementation: I'm
going to guess that comp.unix.programmer would be a good bet.

--
The second Jena users conference -- be there or have rdf:type geometric:Square.
"You've spotted a flaw in my thinking, Trev" Big Al, /The Beiderbeck Connection/

Hewlett-Packard Limited registered office: Cain Road, Bracknell,
registered no: 690597 England Berks RG12 1HN

[Army1987]

<pa********@hotmail.comha scritto nel messaggio
news:11**********************@p15g2000hsd.googlegr oups.com...

hi all,
according to the defintion it seems that the dynamic symbol table will
normally not load all he symbols in the symbol table. With rdynamic it
does to all,
What is the algorithm to generate the dynamic symbol table? or can you
please forward me some documents regarding that

Command-line options aren't standardized by the C language. They can vary
between compilers.
Also, different compilers can implement the same things in different ways.
You should consult the documentation for your compiler for this issue.

[Army1987]

"Kenny McCormack" <ga*****@xmission.xmission.comha scritto nel messaggio
news:eu**********@news.xmission.com...

Off topic. Not portable. Cant discuss it here. Blah, blah, blah.

Useful clc-related links:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Aspergers
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Clique
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/C_programming_language

I can hardly see the purpose which posting such an answer is supposed to
serve.

The original poster is likely not to know what "portable" means and hence
why he is OT.
Also, it is Asperger('s) not Aspergers, though Wikipedia has a redirect, and
Can't not Cant.
By giving such a response, you give the impression that this newsgroup is a
group of monks in an ivory tower unwilling to ever have anything to do with
anybody else. Keep in mind that both hackers and The Rest Of Them are human
beings.

[Richard Heathfield]

Army1987 said:

<snip>

By giving such a response, you give the impression that this newsgroup
is a group of monks in an ivory tower unwilling to ever have anything
to do with anybody else. Keep in mind that both hackers and The Rest
Of Them are human beings.

You're probably wasting your time. Almost all of Mr McCormack's articles
are deliberately provocative, and can safely be ignored. Nobody
sensible in this group takes him seriously.
--
Richard Heathfield
"Usenet is a strange place" - dmr 29/7/1999
http://www.cpax.org.uk
email: rjh at the above domain, - www.

[Al Balmer]

On Mon, 26 Mar 2007 17:16:52 +0200, "Army1987" <pl********@for.it>
wrote:

>By giving such a response, you give the impression that this newsgroup is a
group of monks in an ivory tower unwilling to ever have anything to do with
anybody else.

Giving that impression was the sole purpose of McCormick's posting. He
is a troll. Ignore him.

--
Al Balmer
Sun City, AZ

[Malcolm McLean]

"Richard Heathfield" <rj*@see.sig.invalidwrote in message

Army1987 said:

<snip>

>By giving such a response, you give the impression that this newsgroup
is a group of monks in an ivory tower unwilling to ever have anything
to do with anybody else. Keep in mind that both hackers and The Rest
Of Them are human beings.

You're probably wasting your time. Almost all of Mr McCormack's articles
are deliberately provocative, and can safely be ignored. Nobody
sensible in this group takes him seriously.

My posts are provocative. Mr McCormack's, I am afraid, are merely insulting.

--
Free games and programming goodies.
http://www.personal.leeds.ac.uk/~bgy1mm

[Kenny McCormack]

In article <ab********************************@4ax.com>,
Al Balmer <al******@att.netwrote:

>On Mon, 26 Mar 2007 17:16:52 +0200, "Army1987" <pl********@for.it>
wrote:

>>By giving such a response, you give the impression that this newsgroup is a
group of monks in an ivory tower unwilling to ever have anything to do with
anybody else.

Giving that impression was the sole purpose of McCormick's posting. He
is a troll. Ignore him.

Thank you. You have done well.

[Jack Klein]

On Mon, 26 Mar 2007 15:49:46 +0000, Richard Heathfield
<rj*@see.sig.invalidwrote in comp.lang.c:

Army1987 said:

<snip>

By giving such a response, you give the impression that this newsgroup
is a group of monks in an ivory tower unwilling to ever have anything
to do with anybody else. Keep in mind that both hackers and The Rest
Of Them are human beings.

You're probably wasting your time. Almost all of Mr McCormack's articles
are deliberately provocative, and can safely be ignored. Nobody
sensible in this group takes him seriously.

Is there anybody sensible in this group who hasn't kill-filed him long
ago? I would never see him at all except for the times when he lures
others into biting on his bait.

--
Jack Klein
Home: http://JK-Technology.Com
FAQs for
comp.lang.c http://c-faq.com/
comp.lang.c++ http://www.parashift.com/c++-faq-lite/
alt.comp.lang.learn.c-c++
http://www.club.cc.cmu.edu/~ajo/docs/FAQ-acllc.html

[CBFalconer]

Army1987 wrote:

"Kenny McCormack" <ga*****@xmission.xmission.comha scritto:

>Off topic. Not portable. Cant discuss it here. Blah, blah, blah.

Useful clc-related links:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Aspergers
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Clique
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/C_programming_language

I can hardly see the purpose which posting such an answer is
supposed to serve.

The original poster is likely not to know what "portable" means and
hence why he is OT. Also, it is Asperger('s) not Aspergers, though
Wikipedia has a redirect, and Can't not Cant.

By giving such a response, you give the impression that this
newsgroup is a group of monks in an ivory tower unwilling to ever
have anything to do with anybody else. Keep in mind that both
hackers and The Rest Of Them are human beings.

Kenny is a known troll, thus inhuman, and anything from it is
automatically cant. (Look it up in your English/Italian
dictionary).

A more useful set of links follows:

--
Some useful references about C:
<http://www.ungerhu.com/jxh/clc.welcome.txt>
<http://www.eskimo.com/~scs/C-faq/top.html (C-faq)
<http://benpfaff.org/writings/clc/off-topic.html>
<http://anubis.dkuug.dk/jtc1/sc22/wg14/www/docs/n869/(C99)
<http://www.dinkumware.com/refxc.html (C-library}
<http://gcc.gnu.org/onlinedocs/ (GNU docs)
<http://clc-wiki.net/wiki/C_community:comp.lang.c:Introduction>

--
Posted via a free Usenet account from http://www.teranews.com

[Chris Dollin]

Jack Klein wrote:

Is there anybody sensible in this group who hasn't kill-filed him long
ago?

Me. Killfiling in knode is too complicated for my hedgehog-sized brain.

--
The second Jena user conference! http://hpl.hp.com/conferences/juc2007/
"You've spotted a flaw in my thinking, Trev" Big Al,/The Beiderbeck Connection/

Hewlett-Packard Limited registered office: Cain Road, Bracknell,
registered no: 690597 England Berks RG12 1HN

[Richard Heathfield]

Chris Dollin said:

Jack Klein wrote:

>Is there anybody sensible in this group who hasn't kill-filed him
long ago?

Me. Killfiling in knode is too complicated for my hedgehog-sized
brain.

Likewise. So either we fund a major research effort into the esoterica
of knode, or we continue with our present policy of virtual killfiles
(i.e. ignoring offenders whenever we happen to remember).

It's no contest, really.

--
Richard Heathfield
"Usenet is a strange place" - dmr 29/7/1999
http://www.cpax.org.uk
email: rjh at the above domain, - www.

[Al Balmer]

On Tue, 27 Mar 2007 09:54:03 +0100, Chris Dollin <ch**********@hp.com>
wrote:

>Jack Klein wrote:

>Is there anybody sensible in this group who hasn't kill-filed him long
ago?

Me. Killfiling in knode is too complicated for my hedgehog-sized brain.

http://lists.debian.org/debian-kde/2.../msg00023.html

--
Al Balmer
Sun City, AZ

[Chris Dollin]

Al Balmer wrote:

On Tue, 27 Mar 2007 09:54:03 +0100, Chris Dollin <ch**********@hp.com>
wrote:

>>Jack Klein wrote:

>>Is there anybody sensible in this group who hasn't kill-filed him long
ago?

Me. Killfiling in knode is too complicated for my hedgehog-sized brain.

http://lists.debian.org/debian-kde/2.../msg00023.html

Yes, that's an excellent example of it being too complicated. I've tried
that. It didn't please me. Scoring, pah. If I want scoring, I'll go play
/Age of Steam/.

--
Yes, Virginia, there is a second Jena user conference: Palo Alto, Sep 2007.
"You're not supposed to /think/ about it, /The Beiderbeck Connection/
you're supposed to say NO!" Jill Swinburn

Hewlett-Packard Limited Cain Road, Bracknell, registered no:
registered office: Berks RG12 1HN 690597 England

[Richard Heathfield]

Al Balmer said:

On Tue, 27 Mar 2007 09:54:03 +0100, Chris Dollin <ch**********@hp.com>
wrote:

>>Jack Klein wrote:

>>Is there anybody sensible in this group who hasn't kill-filed him
long ago?

Me. Killfiling in knode is too complicated for my hedgehog-sized
brain.

http://lists.debian.org/debian-kde/2.../msg00023.html

Well well well - it works. How about that?

I just killed Kenny.

--
Richard Heathfield
"Usenet is a strange place" - dmr 29/7/1999
http://www.cpax.org.uk
email: rjh at the above domain, - www.

[Richard Heathfield]

Chris Dollin said:

Al Balmer wrote:

>On Tue, 27 Mar 2007 09:54:03 +0100, Chris Dollin
<ch**********@hp.comwrote:

>>>Jack Klein wrote:

Is there anybody sensible in this group who hasn't kill-filed him
long ago?

Me. Killfiling in knode is too complicated for my hedgehog-sized
brain.

http://lists.debian.org/debian-kde/2.../msg00023.html

Yes, that's an excellent example of it being too complicated. I've
tried that. It didn't please me. Scoring, pah. If I want scoring, I'll
go play /Age of Steam/.

No no no, Chris - it's not all that complicated (otherwise how could I
have done it?), and it's a one-timer, and it does appear to work. You
just do the complicated bit *once*. Thereafter, lowering the score of
the author below 0 removes his articles from the feed view -
permanently.

I recommend that you follow the one-off procedure, and then exit Knode
(to let it save its settings), then restart it.

Seriously, this is a big win - it eliminates one of two major
outstanding (perceived) problems with Knode - and having broadband, I
don't care about the other problem (offline reading) any more anyway.

--
Richard Heathfield
"Usenet is a strange place" - dmr 29/7/1999
http://www.cpax.org.uk
email: rjh at the above domain, - www.

[Default User]

Richard Heathfield wrote:

Well well well - it works. How about that?

I just killed Kenny.

You bastard.

Brian

[Kenny McCormack]

In article <Za******************************@bt.com>,
Richard Heathfield <rj*@see.sig.invalidwrote:

>Al Balmer said:

>On Tue, 27 Mar 2007 09:54:03 +0100, Chris Dollin <ch**********@hp.com>
wrote:

>>>Jack Klein wrote:

Is there anybody sensible in this group who hasn't kill-filed him
long ago?

Me. Killfiling in knode is too complicated for my hedgehog-sized
brain.

http://lists.debian.org/debian-kde/2.../msg00023.html

Well well well - it works. How about that?

I just killed Kenny.

You bastard!

[CBFalconer]

Chris Dollin wrote:

Jack Klein wrote:

>Is there anybody sensible in this group who hasn't kill-filed him
long ago?

Me. Killfiling in knode is too complicated for my hedgehog-sized
brain.

Can't that hedgehogic brain transmit a finger command to push 'N'?

--
Chuck F (cbfalconer at maineline dot net)
Available for consulting/temporary embedded and systems.
<http://cbfalconer.home.att.net>

--
Posted via a free Usenet account from http://www.teranews.com

[CBFalconer]

Richard Heathfield wrote:

>

.... snip ...

>
I just killed Kenny.

I thought the UK abandoned that penalty. Did you call the fuzz?

--
Chuck F (cbfalconer at maineline dot net)
Available for consulting/temporary embedded and systems.
<http://cbfalconer.home.att.net>

--
Posted via a free Usenet account from http://www.teranews.com

[Chris Dollin]

CBFalconer wrote:

Chris Dollin wrote:

>Jack Klein wrote:

>>Is there anybody sensible in this group who hasn't kill-filed him
long ago?

Me. Killfiling in knode is too complicated for my hedgehog-sized
brain.

Can't that hedgehogic brain transmit a finger command to push 'N'?

'N' doesn't killfile.

[It skips messages just fine.]

--
Is it a bird? It is a plane? No, it's: http://hpl.hp.com/conferences/juc2007/
"There's a doorway where there was a wall" /Master Humpries Clock/

Hewlett-Packard Limited Cain Road, Bracknell, registered no:
registered office: Berks RG12 1HN 690597 England

[Richard Bos]

CBFalconer <cb********@yahoo.comwrote:

Richard Heathfield wrote:

I just killed Kenny.

I thought the UK abandoned that penalty. Did you call the fuzz?

No, but I bet two cats appeared.

Richard