Not virtual good function called

[Remi Ricard]

Hi,

This is a code that reproduce my problem.

#include <stdio.h>
class A {
public:
virtual int get(int a)=0;
int get(float a) {return 1;}
};

class B : public A {
public:
virtual int get(int a) { return 2; }
};

void main()
{
B b;
printf("b->get(12)=%d b->get(1.234)=%d\n", b.get(99), b.get(1.234));
}

The output is:
b->get(12)=2 b->get(1.234)=2
Why the second call b.get(1.2.3.4) don't call the function A::get(float) ??

I think, I have a conversion from float to int then the function
B::get(int) is called. Why ??

Remi Ricard
ri****@gmc.ulaval.ca

[Kevin Goodsell]

Remi Ricard wrote:

Hi,

This is a code that reproduce my problem.

#include <stdio.h>
class A {
public:
virtual int get(int a)=0;
int get(float a) {return 1;}
};
class B : public A {
public:
virtual int get(int a) { return 2; }
This hides any other 'get' function that would have otherwise been
inherited. You can avoid this with

using A::get;
};

void main()
main returns int in C++. The standard requires this. void has never been
an acceptable return type for main.
{
B b;
printf("b->get(12)=%d b->get(1.234)=%d\n", b.get(99), b.get(1.234));
}

The output is:
b->get(12)=2 b->get(1.234)=2
Why the second call b.get(1.2.3.4) don't call the function A::get(float) ??
Because A::get(float) doesn't exist for B. Overload resolution doesn't
cross inheritance boundaries.

I think, I have a conversion from float to int then the function
B::get(int) is called. Why ??

It's the only acceptable overload.

-Kevin
--
My email address is valid, but changes periodically.
To contact me please use the address from a recent posting.

[Julián Albo]

Remi Ricard escribió:

#include <stdio.h>
class A {
public:
virtual int get(int a)=0;
int get(float a) {return 1;}
};

class B : public A {
public:
virtual int get(int a) { return 2; }
};

void main()
{
B b;
printf("b->get(12)=%d b->get(1.234)=%d\n", b.get(99), b.get(1.234));
}

The output is:
b->get(12)=2 b->get(1.234)=2

Why the second call b.get(1.2.3.4) don't call the function A::get(float) ??

The get function in B hides all get functions in A. If you want to make
it visible you need to put in B:

using A::get;

Regards.

[Hafiz Abid Qadeer]

Julián Albo <JU********@terra.es> wrote in message news:<3F***************@terra.es>...

Remi Ricard escribi :

#include <stdio.h>
class A {
public:
virtual int get(int a)=0;
int get(float a) {return 1;}
};

class B : public A {
public:
virtual int get(int a) { return 2; }
};

void main()
{
B b;
printf("b->get(12)=%d b->get(1.234)=%d\n", b.get(99), b.get(1.2

34));

}

The output is:
b->get(12)=2 b->get(1.234)=2

Why the second call b.get(1.2.3.4) don't call the function A::get(float

) ??

The get function in B hides all get functions in A. If you want to make
it visible you need to put in B:

using A::get;

Regards.

when you call b.get(1.234)), compiler first looks in B. It finds a
function that has the same name and 1.234 can be converted to its ats
argument type (int) so it stops looking further for that name. To call
the A's function, you have to use the method described in the above
postings. Hope that helps.

Regards
Hafiz Abid Qadeer

[Michiel Salters]

ha*************@yahoo.com (Hafiz Abid Qadeer) wrote in message news:<9c**************************@posting.google. com>...

Julián Albo <JU********@terra.es> wrote in message news:<3F***************@terra.es>...

Remi Ricard escribi :

#include <stdio.h>
class A {
public:
virtual int get(int a)=0;
int get(float a) {return 1;}
};
class B : public A {
public:
virtual int get(int a) { return 2; }
};

[SNIP] when you call b.get(1.234)), compiler first looks in B. It finds a
function that has the same name and 1.234 can be converted to its ats
argument type (int) so it stops looking further for that name.

The compiler stops even earlier. Even if you couldn't convert
1.234 to int, once the compiler has found one get() it will not
go up one inheritance level. It will search for additional get()
overloads only in the class where it found the first no matter
what type of arguments.

Regards