Which one is the best log4cpp , log4cplus or log4cxx ?

[Matthieu Labour]

Hi,
I want to use a c++ version of log4j. But there are 3 of them :log4cpp,
log4cplus, log4cx.
Whis one is the best ?
Thank you

[Kevin Goodsell]

Matthieu Labour wrote:

Hi,
I want to use a c++ version of log4j. But there are 3 of them :log4cpp,
log4cplus, log4cx.
Whis one is the best ?
Thank you

The solution to your problem can be found here:

http://www.slack.net/~shiva/welcome.txt

-Kevin
--
My email address is valid, but changes periodically.
To contact me please use the address from a recent posting.

[Frank Schmitt]

Kevin Goodsell <us*********************@neverbox.com> writes:

Matthieu Labour wrote:

Hi,
I want to use a c++ version of log4j. But there are 3 of them :log4cpp,
log4cplus, log4cx.
Whis one is the best ?
Thank you

The solution to your problem can be found here:

http://www.slack.net/~shiva/welcome.txt

Huh? Since when is a question of the sort "Is library bla better than library
blubb" OT?
Every time someone asks "What is the best documentation tool?" or
"What is the best cross-platform GUI library?", he gets valid answers - so
why not here?

The OT police in this NG is getting just ridiculous, IMHO.

regards
frank

--
Frank Schmitt
4SC AG phone: [phone]
e-mail: frank DOT schmitt AT 4sc DOT com

[Alf P. Steinbach]

On 08 Sep 2003 10:04:20 +0200, Frank Schmitt <fr***********@4sc.com> wrote:

Kevin Goodsell <us*********************@neverbox.com> writes:

Matthieu Labour wrote:

> Hi,
> I want to use a c++ version of log4j. But there are 3 of them :log4cpp,
> log4cplus, log4cx.
> Whis one is the best ?
> Thank you
The solution to your problem can be found here:

http://www.slack.net/~shiva/welcome.txt

Huh? Since when is a question of the sort "Is library bla better than library
blubb" OT?

Since the very beginning. See [http://www.slack.net/~shiva/welcome.txt].
Every time someone asks "What is the best documentation tool?" or
"What is the best cross-platform GUI library?", he gets valid answers
That is incorrect.

so why not here?
See [http://www.slack.net/~shiva/welcome.txt].

The OT police in this NG is getting just ridiculous, IMHO.

See [http://www.slack.net/~shiva/welcome.txt].

Read The Fucking Manual -- [ftp://rftm.mit.edu].
Hth.,

- Alf (longtime newser)

[Frank Schmitt]

al***@start.no (Alf P. Steinbach) writes:

On 08 Sep 2003 10:04:20 +0200, Frank Schmitt <fr***********@4sc.com> wrote:

Kevin Goodsell <us*********************@neverbox.com> writes:

Matthieu Labour wrote:

> Hi,
> I want to use a c++ version of log4j. But there are 3 of them :log4cpp,
> log4cplus, log4cx.
> Whis one is the best ?
> Thank you

The solution to your problem can be found here:

http://www.slack.net/~shiva/welcome.txt
Huh? Since when is a question of the sort "Is library bla better
than library blubb" OT?

Since the very beginning. See [http://www.slack.net/~shiva/welcome.txt].

Every time someone asks "What is the best documentation tool?" or
"What is the best cross-platform GUI library?", he gets valid answers

That is incorrect.

Oh, really?
How about

http://tinyurl.com/mmnx
http://tinyurl.com/mmo1
http://tinyurl.com/mmoa

so why not here?

See [http://www.slack.net/~shiva/welcome.txt].

Been there, done that, thank you.

The OT police in this NG is getting just ridiculous, IMHO.

See [http://www.slack.net/~shiva/welcome.txt].

Read The Fucking Manual -- [ftp://rftm.mit.edu].

How nice.
- Alf (longtime newser)

frank - longtime newser who, until now, thought that clueless
newbies were the worst thing on usenet - but recently, angry
veterans are getting surprisingly close.

--
Frank Schmitt
4SC AG phone: [phone]
e-mail: frank DOT schmitt AT 4sc DOT com

[Alf P. Steinbach]

On 08 Sep 2003 16:36:45 +0200, Frank Schmitt <fr***********@4sc.com> wrote:

al***@start.no (Alf P. Steinbach) writes:

On 08 Sep 2003 10:04:20 +0200, Frank Schmitt <fr***********@4sc.com> wrote:

>Every time someone asks "What is the best documentation tool?" or
>"What is the best cross-platform GUI library?", he gets valid answers
That is incorrect.

Oh, really?

Yes.

How about

http://tinyurl.com/mmnx
http://tinyurl.com/mmo1
http://tinyurl.com/mmoa

None of those contain requests for "best" of anything.

Asking for "best" is trolling.

See [http://www.slack.net/~shiva/welcome.txt].

Been there, done that, thank you.

Please follow that advice, then. Thank you.

>The OT police in this NG is getting just ridiculous, IMHO.

See [http://www.slack.net/~shiva/welcome.txt].

Read The Fucking Manual -- [ftp://rftm.mit.edu].

How nice.

It is. Unfortunately MIT did not follow up when the web started
gaining popularity, and so many FAQs are now only available on the
web. But do Read The Fucking Manual anyway -- thank you.

[Kevin Goodsell]

Frank Schmitt wrote:

al***@start.no (Alf P. Steinbach) writes:

Since the very beginning. See [http://www.slack.net/~shiva/welcome.txt].

Every time someone asks "What is the best documentation tool?" or
"What is the best cross-platform GUI library?", he gets valid answers

That is incorrect.

Oh, really?
How about

http://tinyurl.com/mmnx
http://tinyurl.com/mmo1
http://tinyurl.com/mmoa

Occasionally some people answer an off-topic question. That doesn't make
the questions on-topic, it just means both the question and answer are
off-topic.

If the person had said something like, "I'm sorry for the off-topic
post, but I haven't been able to find a good answer to this and I hope
someone here who has experience with these can help me," then I would
have ignored the message. He gave no indication that he knew or cared
that his message was off-topic, or that he had bothered to 1) try to
find out what is topical before posting, 2) tried to find an answer
himself, 3) checked for a welcome message of FAQ for the group before
posting, 4) read several messages before posting. 1 through 4 are common
usenet courtesy. He showed no respect for the group, so I don't feel a
particular need to show respect for him. I did point him to a useful
document, however, which is more than his post deserved.

-Kevin
--
My email address is valid, but changes periodically.
To contact me please use the address from a recent posting.

[Frank Schmitt]

Kevin Goodsell <us*********************@neverbox.com> writes:

Occasionally some people answer an off-topic question. That doesn't
make the questions on-topic, it just means both the question and
answer are off-topic.
Agreed.
If the person had said something like, "I'm sorry for the off-topic
post, but I haven't been able to find a good answer to this and I hope
someone here who has experience with these can help me," then I would
have ignored the message. He gave no indication that he knew or cared
that his message was off-topic, or that he had bothered to 1) try to
find out what is topical before posting, 2) tried to find an answer
himself, 3) checked for a welcome message of FAQ for the group before
posting, 4) read several messages before posting. 1 through 4 are
common usenet courtesy. He showed no respect for the group, so I don't
feel a particular need to show respect for him. I did point him to a
useful document, however, which is more than his post deserved.

Sounds sensible to me - although IMHO questions like the one the OP
asked should be on-topic in comp.lang.c++, but that's just my
personal opinion.

regards
frank

--
Frank Schmitt
4SC AG phone: [phone]
e-mail: frank DOT schmitt AT 4sc DOT com

[Mike Smith]

Frank Schmitt wrote:

Sounds sensible to me - although IMHO questions like the one the OP
asked should be on-topic in comp.lang.c++, but that's just my
personal opinion.

Maybe we need a group like "comp.c++.programming" or somesuch for
discussion of actual programming in C++? (Or is there one already?)

--
Mike Smith

[Alf P. Steinbach]

On Tue, 09 Sep 2003 15:02:16 -0400, Mike Smith <mi*******************@acm.DOT.org> wrote:

Frank Schmitt wrote:

Sounds sensible to me - although IMHO questions like the one the OP
asked should be on-topic in comp.lang.c++, but that's just my
personal opinion.

Maybe we need a group like "comp.c++.programming" or somesuch for
discussion of actual programming in C++? (Or is there one already?)

<url:news:no.it.programmering.c++>

Accepts english postings.

[llewelly]

al***@start.no (Alf P. Steinbach) writes:

On Tue, 09 Sep 2003 15:02:16 -0400, Mike Smith <mi*******************@acm.DOT.org> wrote:

Frank Schmitt wrote:

Sounds sensible to me - although IMHO questions like the one the OP
asked should be on-topic in comp.lang.c++, but that's just my
personal opinion.

Maybe we need a group like "comp.c++.programming" or somesuch for
discussion of actual programming in C++? (Or is there one already?)

<url:news:no.it.programmering.c++>

Accepts english postings.

Would it really be fair for you Norwegians to innundated by English
postings?