Gavin Deane wrote:
However, there is a difference between discussing the use of Boost and
mentioning it as a potential solution. It is written to be
standard-compliant and platform independent so if it offers a solution
I think it is worth mentioning. The questioner then has the
opportunity to investigate it and consider using it.
I understand that. As I was trying to get across, it's still (at this
time) a third-party library. While standard-compliant, and so usuable by
pretty much everyone, it's still the case that it doesn't come with a
standard library set for compilers. A solution using Boost requires the
download and installation of said libraries, and for some people it just
won't be possible.
Unfortunately, people who suggest Boost to solve problems don't make
clear much of the time. The answer often goes like, "it's easy, just use
Boost's lexical cast."
As I said, while I kind of object to this, it's not the prevailing
opinion. Unlike some, I respect the feelings of the regulars and so
won't complain.
Brian Rodenborn