By using this site, you agree to our updated Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Manage your Cookies Settings.
428,997 Members | 1,270 Online
Bytes IT Community
+ Ask a Question
Need help? Post your question and get tips & solutions from a community of 428,997 IT Pros & Developers. It's quick & easy.

Is a load-store architecture machine more suitable to run C++ code?

P: n/a
Is a load-store architecture machine more suitable to run C++ code?

Mar 2 '07 #1
Share this Question
Share on Google+
3 Replies


P: n/a
* dick:
Is a load-store architecture machine more suitable to run C++ code?
What's the C++ question?

And more generally, what's the question?

--
A: Because it messes up the order in which people normally read text.
Q: Why is it such a bad thing?
A: Top-posting.
Q: What is the most annoying thing on usenet and in e-mail?
Mar 2 '07 #2

P: n/a
On Mar 2, 6:30 am, "dick" <dick_12345...@hotmail.comwrote:
Is a load-store architecture machine more suitable to run C++ code?
That will probably depend on which C++ code we are talking about. I'm
quite confident that you can write code in C++ that will suite to just
about any architecture, but the reverse should also be true, that you
can write code unsuitable for any architecture.

--
Erik Wikström

Mar 2 '07 #3

P: n/a
dick wrote:
Is a load-store architecture machine more suitable to run C++ code?
I don't know why you would say that. And LS architectures vary
widely from old lockstep processors to pipelined RISC things.
The compiler generally can (and must) make use of a variety
of things.

C's roots are in both architectures.
Mar 5 '07 #4

This discussion thread is closed

Replies have been disabled for this discussion.