By using this site, you agree to our updated Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Manage your Cookies Settings.
446,159 Members | 936 Online
Bytes IT Community
+ Ask a Question
Need help? Post your question and get tips & solutions from a community of 446,159 IT Pros & Developers. It's quick & easy.

Compiler standard compliance comparison

P: n/a
Hi!
Anyone know of a new and well conducted comparison between different C++
compilers based on standard compliance?

Best regards,
/Michael

Jul 19 '05 #1
Share this Question
Share on Google+
3 Replies


P: n/a
"Michael Andersson" <mi*****@ida.his.se> wrote in message
news:3F**************@ida.his.se...
Hi!
Anyone know of a new and well conducted comparison between different C++
compilers based on standard compliance?

Trial and Error? :-P
Jul 19 '05 #2

P: n/a
On Thu, 31 Jul 2003 10:58:55 +0200, Michael Andersson
<mi*****@ida.his.se> wrote:
Hi!
Anyone know of a new and well conducted comparison between different C++
compilers based on standard compliance?


How new is new?

http://www.cuj.com/roundup/

Such a thing takes a lot of work, ownership of a C++ proofer, and time
to tweak it (which may involve being the author of the tool), so there
aren't many around.

See also:
http://www.dinkumware.com/conform_cpp.html
but note that the article is written by a C++ library author and only
tests library conformance.

Tom
Jul 19 '05 #3

P: n/a
"tom_usenet" <to********@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:3f***************@news.easynet.co.uk...
| Such a thing takes a lot of work, ownership of a C++ proofer, and time
| to tweak it (which may involve being the author of the tool), so there
| aren't many around.
I totally agree. I keep coming up with
http://archive.devx.com/free/links/s...ontent_id=1218 on google,
but the link provided on there is dead (for now?). Plus I'm not too sure on
the professionalism (or verbosity) that it would provide.

This is something you should do on your own, and I'm sure if you put it up
somewhere (some webhosting site) that you should expect alot of traffic.
Jul 19 '05 #4

This discussion thread is closed

Replies have been disabled for this discussion.