Richard Weeks wrote On 02/26/07 16:51,:
I have a library of functions for operations on complex numbers
and a complex type defined as a struct in a header also
containing the prototypes for the library. I want to make this an
opaque type, i.e. I don't want the real and imaginary fields to
be visible to the user of the interface. I tried doing this:
static struct cplex {
double real;
double imag;
};
but the compiler complained "storage class not legal in this
context." How can I implement cplex as an opaque type?
The "clean" way is to have the header describe your
functions as accepting and delivering `struct cplex *'
pointer values, but omit any description of the struct
itself. That description instead goes into a "private"
header that your library code #includes, but that isn't
"exported" for use by the clients. One consequence is
that since your clients don't know what `struct cplex'
looks like, they can't create struct instances without
help: You will need cplex_create() and cplex_destroy()
functions, or something equivalent.
The "better" way is to find a C99 implementation and
use the complex arithmetic features it provides. At the
very least, make your code look as much like that of C99
as you can, so an eventual conversion (perhaps to C0x)
will be relatively painless.
--
Er*********@sun.com 
