I have discovered the secret of the soul

[1]

I have discovered the secret of the soul

The soul is the emotion. The soul and the emotion are completely
nonmaterial existence. The consciousness and the emotion are
inseparable, which means each consciousness accompanies the
corresponding emotion.

We must understand that the whole brain is a energy system besides as
a nervous system, which has the basic property of each energy system-
the process of energy release and absorb. The emotion, namely the
soul, can control the whole brain as a energy system to release the
energy, acting on the nerve cells of the cerebral cortex.

Take the movement for example, the highest mandator(prime mover) of
movement is not the cerebral motor cortex but the movement
"consciousness" and the movement "emotion".The movement "emotion"
activate the discharge of the motor neurons by control the whole brain
to release energy to act on the cerebral motor cortex, which creates
the movement by passing to the muscle by nerves. The cerebral motor
cortex is the executive officer of movement, the executor of the
movement "consciousness", the executor of the movement "emotion" and
the movement "soul".

The brain has two parallel systems. One is nonmaterial-the soul, and
the other is material-the nervous system.

The whole brain as an energy system releasing energy is the bridge and
the connection of the completely nonmaterial system-the soul and the
material system-the cerebral cortex and the nerve cells.

It is the most miraculous secret of the nature and God that the soul,
the completely nonmaterial-system, controls the whole brain as an
energy system to release energy to act on the material system- the
cerebral cortex and the nerve cells.

[werasm]

1 wrote:

It is the most miraculous secret of the nature and God that the soul,
the completely nonmaterial-system, controls the whole brain as an
energy system to release energy to act on the material system- the
cerebral cortex and the nerve cells.

It may be, but I'm wondering whether God would want you to post this
in a C++ newsgroup. You are probably causing the readers to be upset
with Him and you simultaneously. What are your motives. If you are
wanting to promote God (or His miracles) you certainly are not doing
it by posting that here.

[Ian Collins]

werasm wrote:

1 wrote:

>>It is the most miraculous secret of the nature and God that the soul,
the completely nonmaterial-system, controls the whole brain as an
energy system to release energy to act on the material system- the
cerebral cortex and the nerve cells.

It may be, but I'm wondering whether God would want you to post this
in a C++ newsgroup. You are probably causing the readers to be upset
with Him and you simultaneously. What are your motives. If you are
wanting to promote God (or His miracles) you certainly are not doing
it by posting that here.

Please don't reply to spam that some news servers can and do filter out.

--
Ian Collins.

[Rolf Magnus]

Ian Collins wrote:

>It may be, but I'm wondering whether God would want you to post this
in a C++ newsgroup. You are probably causing the readers to be upset
with Him and you simultaneously. What are your motives. If you are
wanting to promote God (or His miracles) you certainly are not doing
it by posting that here.

Please don't reply to spam that some news servers can and do filter out.

When replying to spam or to replies to spam, please don't quote the spam
itself.

[Jacek Dziedzic]

Rolf Magnus wrote:

Ian Collins wrote:

>>[spam redacted]

Please don't reply to spam that some news servers can and do filter out.

When replying to spam or to replies to spam, please don't quote the spam
itself.

What about replies to replies to spam? Should the spam be quoted,
because it suddenly became a part of context, or should it be stripped?
What about replies to replies to replies to spam, as this one? :>

This is getting recursive, better bail out before my stack wraps.

:),
- J.

[Diego Martins]

On Feb 8, 10:18 am, Jacek Dziedzic
<[e-mail]:

Rolf Magnus wrote:

Ian Collins wrote:

>>[spam redacted]

Please don't reply to spam that some news servers can and do filter out.

When replying to spam or to replies to spam, please don't quote the spam
itself.

What about replies to replies to spam? Should the spam be quoted,
because it suddenly became a part of context, or should it be stripped?
What about replies to replies to replies to spam, as this one? :>

This is getting recursive, better bail out before my stack wraps.

:),
- J.

I can't find any spam.
Only bullshit and nonsense.
:)