How to describle array elements with UML2.0?

[Allen]

For example

class Foo
{
public:
int a[3];
};

I write as following
+a : int[3]

But the generated code is much different.
class Foo
{
public:
Vector<inta;
};

Please help me how to describe it.

[Ian Collins]

Allen wrote:

For example

class Foo
{
public:
int a[3];
};

I write as following
+a : int[3]

But the generated code is much different.
class Foo
{
public:
Vector<inta;
};

Please help me how to describe it.

Sounds like a tool specific problem, try a group or forum for your UML tool.

--
Ian Collins.

[p_adib]

Allen wrote:

I write as following
+a : int[3]
Please help me how to describe it.

Try the group

For example

class Foo
{
public:
int a[3];
};

Try the comp.object newsgroup. I read this description about it in the
comp.lang.c++ FAQ, Item [5.8]:
[...]
comp.object
* Mostly OO design issues, with less emphasis on OO programming)
* That group's FAQ contains an excellent introduction to OO along
with an overview of OO terms and concepts
[...]

Even if that's not the right newsgroup, at least you're getting closer.
;)

[Salt_Peter]

Allen wrote:

For example

class Foo
{
public:
int a[3];
};

I write as following
+a : int[3]

But the generated code is much different.
class Foo
{
public:
Vector<inta;
};

Please help me how to describe it.

Noone can help you here with that. Except to say that the generated
code would be more accurate if:

#include <vector>
class Foo
{
std::vector<inta;
public:
Foo() : a(3) { }
};