473,287 Members | 1,659 Online
Bytes | Software Development & Data Engineering Community
Post Job

Home Posts Topics Members FAQ

Join Bytes to post your question to a community of 473,287 software developers and data experts.

Why does Platform SDK define union LARGE_INTEGER in such a way?

Why does Platform SDK define union LARGE_INTEGER in such a way?

ntdef.h defines the union LARGE_INTEGER as follows:
typedef union _LARGE_INTEGER
{
struct
{
ULONG LowPart;
LONG HighPart;
};
struct
{
ULONG LowPart;
LONG HighPart;
} u;
LONGLONG QuadPart;

} LARGE_INTEGER;
Though I fully understand what union is, I cannot think out the reason
why it adds struct u into the union. In fact, the struct u is
equivalent to the unnamed struct, so we can alway use the unnamed
struct instead of struct u. To my thinking, the union should be
designed as follows:

typedef union _LARGE_INTEGER
{
struct
{
ULONG LowPart;
LONG HighPart;
};
LONGLONG QuadPart;

} LARGE_INTEGER;
Am I right?

Who can tell me what the consideration for the former definition is,
and what does it mean by the struct name "u" (means "unsigned" ?, I'm
not sure.)?
Thanks in advance.

Oct 6 '06 #1
3 8753

Lighter wrote:
Why does Platform SDK define union LARGE_INTEGER in such a way?

ntdef.h defines the union LARGE_INTEGER as follows:
typedef union _LARGE_INTEGER
{
struct
{
ULONG LowPart;
LONG HighPart;
};
struct
{
ULONG LowPart;
LONG HighPart;
} u;
LONGLONG QuadPart;

} LARGE_INTEGER;
Though I fully understand what union is, I cannot think out the reason
why it adds struct u into the union. In fact, the struct u is
equivalent to the unnamed struct, so we can alway use the unnamed
struct instead of struct u. To my thinking, the union should be
designed as follows:

typedef union _LARGE_INTEGER
{
struct
{
ULONG LowPart;
LONG HighPart;
};
LONGLONG QuadPart;

} LARGE_INTEGER;
Am I right?

Who can tell me what the consideration for the former definition is,
and what does it mean by the struct name "u" (means "unsigned" ?, I'm
not sure.)?
Thanks in advance.
Oh, another guy works in Windows. See the following link:

http://msdn.microsoft.com/library/de...nteger_str.asp

.. Ask a programmer who works for Microsoft. Maybe they think of
compatibility.

Oct 6 '06 #2
Lighter wrote:
Why does Platform SDK define union LARGE_INTEGER in such a way?

ntdef.h defines the union LARGE_INTEGER as follows:
typedef union _LARGE_INTEGER
The tag name is reserved for implementation use. I think you're showing
a file from your implementation, in which case it is free to use these
reserved names, as well as non-standard features that may be provided.
{
struct
{
ULONG LowPart;
LONG HighPart;
};
Unnamed union members are not available in standard C.
>
struct
{
ULONG LowPart;
LONG HighPart;
} u;
LONGLONG QuadPart;

} LARGE_INTEGER;
Though I fully understand what union is, I cannot think out the reason
why it adds struct u into the union. In fact, the struct u is
equivalent to the unnamed struct, so we can alway use the unnamed
struct instead of struct u. To my thinking, the union should be
designed as follows:
No, the unnamed struct is illegal in standard C. If you want to write
standard C, leave out the unnamed struct and keep u. If you want to
write non-standard C, move to a platform-specific newsgroup.
typedef union _LARGE_INTEGER
{
struct
{
ULONG LowPart;
LONG HighPart;
};
LONGLONG QuadPart;

} LARGE_INTEGER;
Am I right?
No, this suffers from the same problem. You removed the wrong struct.
Who can tell me what the consideration for the former definition is,
and what does it mean by the struct name "u" (means "unsigned" ?, I'm
not sure.)?
I suppose, on compilers that allow unnamed struct members of unions, it
gives the user an option whether to write

LARGE_INTEGER i; i->u->LowPart = 0xFFFFFFFF;

or

LARGE_INTEGER i; i->LowPart = 0xFFFFFFFF;

--
Simon.
Oct 6 '06 #3
"Lighter" <cq****@gmail.comwrites:
Why does Platform SDK define union LARGE_INTEGER in such a way?

ntdef.h defines the union LARGE_INTEGER as follows:
typedef union _LARGE_INTEGER
{
struct
{
ULONG LowPart;
LONG HighPart;
};
struct
{
ULONG LowPart;
LONG HighPart;
} u;
LONGLONG QuadPart;

} LARGE_INTEGER;
Because the author(s) of that code don't care about portability. The
identifer _LARGE_INTEGER is reserved to the implementation (perhaps
the Platform SDK is part of the implementation?). Anonymous members
are not legal in standard C. The code assumes that the low-order half
is stored at the lowest address.

The typedefs (or are they macros?) ULONG, LONG, and LONGLONG are,
IMHO, horribly bad style. If they're always aliases for unsigned
long, long, and long long respectively, then the code should use
unsigned long, long, and long long. If they might sometimes refer to
other types, then the names ULONG, LONG, and LONGLONG are misleading.

Leaving that aside, I suppose the idea is that you can declare

LARGE_INTEGER x;

and then refer to the numeric value as x.QuadPart, and to the
low-order half as either x.LowPart (non-portably) or x.u.LowPart
(portably, if you drop the anonymous structure from the union
declaration), and likewise for the high-order half.

--
Keith Thompson (The_Other_Keith) ks***@mib.org <http://www.ghoti.net/~kst>
San Diego Supercomputer Center <* <http://users.sdsc.edu/~kst>
We must do something. This is something. Therefore, we must do this.
Oct 6 '06 #4

This thread has been closed and replies have been disabled. Please start a new discussion.

Similar topics

6
by: Alessandro Crugnola *sephiroth* | last post by:
hi, i have already problems using py2exe.. i'm using python 2.2, wxPython and audiere for a little mp3 player.. once I've build the exe with py2exe, when launching the application: Traceback...
2
by: Chris Hodapp | last post by:
I have seen messages posted about this before, and there is a clear reference to it in the manual, but I have been unable to find a solution. I'm on Slackware 9.1, kernel 2.6.0-test11, using...
2
by: Christian Seberino | last post by:
I created a C extension that works in Linux great. I tried to make a DLL of it and got an error that didn't happen in Linux... >>> import peak_load Traceback (most recent call last): File...
0
by: Bill Davy | last post by:
Hello, I am using SWIG-1.3.24 to make an extension (called SHIP) to Python2.4.1 and then running under IDLE (if that makes any difference) but when I "import SHIP" I get: >>> import SHIP ...
0
by: Bill Davy | last post by:
I am working with MSVC6 on Windows XP. I have created an MSVC project called SHIP I have a file SHIP.i with "%module SHIP" as the first line (file is below). I run SHIP.i through SWIG 1.3.24...
5
by: Genboy | last post by:
My "VIS" Website, which is a C# site created in VS.NET, Framework 1.1, is no longer compiling for me via the command line. As I have done 600 times in the last year and a half, I can compile to...
4
by: Lighter | last post by:
Why does Platform SDK define union LARGE_INTEGER in such a way? ntdef.h defines the union LARGE_INTEGER as follows: typedef union _LARGE_INTEGER { struct { ULONG LowPart;
22
by: David T. Ashley | last post by:
I'm writing code which will compile on multiple Windows and multiple *nix platforms. Some will have 64-bit integers, I believe. What is my best option to define platform-independent types such...
1
by: JeanDean | last post by:
I have successfully installed the valgrind-3.2.3 but it is resulting in following error ------------------------- valgrind ls -l valgrind: failed to start tool 'memcheck' for platform...
0
by: MeoLessi9 | last post by:
I have VirtualBox installed on Windows 11 and now I would like to install Kali on a virtual machine. However, on the official website, I see two options: "Installer images" and "Virtual machines"....
0
by: DolphinDB | last post by:
The formulas of 101 quantitative trading alphas used by WorldQuant were presented in the paper 101 Formulaic Alphas. However, some formulas are complex, leading to challenges in calculation. Take...
0
by: DolphinDB | last post by:
Tired of spending countless mintues downsampling your data? Look no further! In this article, you’ll learn how to efficiently downsample 6.48 billion high-frequency records to 61 million...
0
by: Aftab Ahmad | last post by:
Hello Experts! I have written a code in MS Access for a cmd called "WhatsApp Message" to open WhatsApp using that very code but the problem is that it gives a popup message everytime I clicked on...
0
by: Aftab Ahmad | last post by:
So, I have written a code for a cmd called "Send WhatsApp Message" to open and send WhatsApp messaage. The code is given below. Dim IE As Object Set IE =...
0
isladogs
by: isladogs | last post by:
The next Access Europe meeting will be on Wednesday 6 Mar 2024 starting at 18:00 UK time (6PM UTC) and finishing at about 19:15 (7.15PM). In this month's session, we are pleased to welcome back...
0
by: Vimpel783 | last post by:
Hello! Guys, I found this code on the Internet, but I need to modify it a little. It works well, the problem is this: Data is sent from only one cell, in this case B5, but it is necessary that data...
0
by: ArrayDB | last post by:
The error message I've encountered is; ERROR:root:Error generating model response: exception: access violation writing 0x0000000000005140, which seems to be indicative of an access violation...
1
by: PapaRatzi | last post by:
Hello, I am teaching myself MS Access forms design and Visual Basic. I've created a table to capture a list of Top 30 singles and forms to capture new entries. The final step is a form (unbound)...

By using Bytes.com and it's services, you agree to our Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.

To disable or enable advertisements and analytics tracking please visit the manage ads & tracking page.