473,396 Members | 2,090 Online
Bytes | Software Development & Data Engineering Community
Post Job

Home Posts Topics Members FAQ

Join Bytes to post your question to a community of 473,396 software developers and data experts.

mergesort - strange output

rkk
Hi,

My mergesort program is below. There is a small piece of logical
error/bug in this code which I can't figure out, as a result the output
array isn't completely sorted. Requesting your help to resolve this
problem. Thanks in advance.

#include <stdlib.h>
#include <string.h>
#include <stdio.h>

typedef int (*CompareFunc)(const void*,const void*);

void MergeSort(void *array[],int left,int right,CompareFunc compare);
void Merge(void *array[],int left,int mid,int right,CompareFunc
compare);
int IntCompare(const void *a,const void *b);
int StrCompare(const void *a,const void *b);

void MergeSort(void *array[],int left,int right,CompareFunc compare)
{
int mid;
if ( left >= right ) return;
mid = (left + right)/2;
MergeSort(array,left,mid,compare);
MergeSort(array,mid + 1,right,compare);
Merge(array,left,mid,right,compare);
}

void Merge(void *array[],int left,int mid,int right,CompareFunc
compare)
{
int numElements = right - left + 1;
void **aux;
int lowerBound = left,upperBound = mid + 1,index = 0;
aux = malloc(numElements * sizeof &array[0]);
if(aux == NULL) {
fprintf(stderr,"Merge: %s\n","malloc failed");
return;
}
while ( lowerBound <= mid && upperBound <= right )
{
if(compare(&array[lowerBound],&array[upperBound]) < 0) {
aux[index++] = array[lowerBound++];
} else {
aux[index++] = array[upperBound++];
}
}
while ( lowerBound <= mid ) aux[index++] = array[lowerBound++];
while ( upperBound <= right) aux[index++] = array[upperBound++];

for(index = left ; index < numElements; index++)
array[index] = aux[index];
free(aux);
}

int IntCompare(const void *a,const void *b)
{
const int *ia = (const int*) a;
const int *ib = (const int*) b;
return ( (*ia *ib) - (*ia < *ib) );
}

int StrCompare(const void *a,const void *b)
{
return strcmp(*(char **) a, *(char **) b);
}

int main()
{
int i;
int iArray[] = {6,3,2,1,4,5,7,9,10,11,13,12,8,14};
int sizeOfArray = sizeof iArray/sizeof iArray[0];
MergeSort((void **)iArray,0,(sizeOfArray-1),IntCompare);
for(i=0; i < sizeOfArray; i++)
printf("%d ", iArray[i] );
printf("\n");
return 0;
}

Here is how I compile:
$ gcc -g -o mergesort mergesort.c

Here is the output:
$ ./mergesort
2 1 3 4 5 6 7 9 10 11 13 12 8 14

Clearly the output isn't completely sorted. Kindly help.

Regards
Kalyan

Sep 30 '06 #1
2 3539
On 30 Sep 2006 07:18:17 -0700, "rkk" <te*******@yahoo.comwrote:
>Hi,

My mergesort program is below. There is a small piece of logical
error/bug in this code which I can't figure out, as a result the output
array isn't completely sorted. Requesting your help to resolve this
problem. Thanks in advance.

#include <stdlib.h>
#include <string.h>
#include <stdio.h>

typedef int (*CompareFunc)(const void*,const void*);

void MergeSort(void *array[],int left,int right,CompareFunc compare);
void Merge(void *array[],int left,int mid,int right,CompareFunc
compare);
int IntCompare(const void *a,const void *b);
int StrCompare(const void *a,const void *b);

void MergeSort(void *array[],int left,int right,CompareFunc compare)
{
int mid;
if ( left >= right ) return;
mid = (left + right)/2;
MergeSort(array,left,mid,compare);
MergeSort(array,mid + 1,right,compare);
Merge(array,left,mid,right,compare);
}

void Merge(void *array[],int left,int mid,int right,CompareFunc
compare)
{
int numElements = right - left + 1;
void **aux;
int lowerBound = left,upperBound = mid + 1,index = 0;
aux = malloc(numElements * sizeof &array[0]);
Conceptually, array is an array of void*. array[0] is the first void*
in the array. &array[0] has type pointer to void* which is expressed
as void**.

aux is a void**. The thing it points to must be a void*. If
sizeof(void*) sizeof(void**) on your system, you are not allocating
enough space.

Eliminate this problem by using sizeof *aux.
> if(aux == NULL) {
fprintf(stderr,"Merge: %s\n","malloc failed");
return;
}
while ( lowerBound <= mid && upperBound <= right )
{
if(compare(&array[lowerBound],&array[upperBound]) < 0) {
aux[index++] = array[lowerBound++];
} else {
aux[index++] = array[upperBound++];
}
}
while ( lowerBound <= mid ) aux[index++] = array[lowerBound++];
while ( upperBound <= right) aux[index++] = array[upperBound++];

for(index = left ; index < numElements; index++)
array[index] = aux[index];
free(aux);
}

int IntCompare(const void *a,const void *b)
{
const int *ia = (const int*) a;
const int *ib = (const int*) b;
return ( (*ia *ib) - (*ia < *ib) );
}

int StrCompare(const void *a,const void *b)
{
return strcmp(*(char **) a, *(char **) b);
}

int main()
int main(void) is preferable.
>{
int i;
int iArray[] = {6,3,2,1,4,5,7,9,10,11,13,12,8,14};
int sizeOfArray = sizeof iArray/sizeof iArray[0];
MergeSort((void **)iArray,0,(sizeOfArray-1),IntCompare);
Here you potentially invoke undefined behavior. You pass the address
of iArray, cast to the correct type, to MergeSort. MergeSort takes
this address and treats the objects (of type int) that it finds there
as having type void*.

Do you know for a fact that an int is properly aligned for a
void*?

Do you know for a fact that they both have the same size? If
not, when MergeSort references array[1] it may actually access
iArray[2] (consider a system with 16-bit int and 32-bit pointers).

Do you know for a fact that the int values are valid for void*?
MerseSort does evaluate them as void* when it copies the values in and
out of aux.
> for(i=0; i < sizeOfArray; i++)
printf("%d ", iArray[i] );
printf("\n");
return 0;
}

Here is how I compile:
$ gcc -g -o mergesort mergesort.c

Here is the output:
$ ./mergesort
2 1 3 4 5 6 7 9 10 11 13 12 8 14

Clearly the output isn't completely sorted. Kindly help.

Regards
Kalyan

Remove del for email
Sep 30 '06 #2
rkk wrote:
>
My mergesort program is below. There is a small piece of logical
error/bug in this code which I can't figure out, as a result the output
array isn't completely sorted. Requesting your help to resolve this
problem. Thanks in advance.
Arrays are easily handled with the standard qsort routine.
Mergesort is better suited for linked lists. You can find an
example of such in the wdfreq demo for hashlib. See the functions
splitlist, mergelists, mergesort. About 60 lines, including fairly
extensive commentary. The whole thing is available at:

<http://cbfalconer.home.att.net/download/>

--
Some useful references about C:
<http://www.ungerhu.com/jxh/clc.welcome.txt>
<http://www.eskimo.com/~scs/C-faq/top.html>
<http://benpfaff.org/writings/clc/off-topic.html>
<http://anubis.dkuug.dk/jtc1/sc22/wg14/www/docs/n869/(C99)
<http://www.dinkumware.com/refxc.html (C-library}
<http://gcc.gnu.org/onlinedocs/ (GNU docs)
<http://clc-wiki.net (C-info)
Oct 1 '06 #3

This thread has been closed and replies have been disabled. Please start a new discussion.

Similar topics

1
by: Jochus | last post by:
Today, I've programmed Mergesort. And it works very good :-)! But now, the teacher said that you could use Mergesort to count the amount of inversions. This is what I found on the internet: ...
1
by: Jamal | last post by:
I am working on binary files of struct ACTIONS I have a recursive qsort/mergesort hybrid that 1) i'm not a 100% sure works correctly 2) would like to convert to iteration Any comments or...
6
by: Jamal | last post by:
I am working on binary files of struct ACTIONS I have a recursive qsort/mergesort hybrid that 1) i'm not a 100% sure works correctly 2) would like to convert to iteration Any comments or...
1
by: ben81 | last post by:
Hi, the following code is adopted PseudoCode from Introduction to Algorithms (Cormen et al). For some reason it can't get it to work. I always get a index of out bounds exception or some weird...
51
by: Joerg Schoen | last post by:
Hi folks! Everyone knows how to sort arrays (e. g. quicksort, heapsort etc.) For linked lists, mergesort is the typical choice. While I was looking for a optimized implementation of mergesort...
5
by: Chad | last post by:
I was looking at some old posts in comp.lang.c and found the following ...
0
by: Charles Arthur | last post by:
How do i turn on java script on a villaon, callus and itel keypad mobile phone
0
BarryA
by: BarryA | last post by:
What are the essential steps and strategies outlined in the Data Structures and Algorithms (DSA) roadmap for aspiring data scientists? How can individuals effectively utilize this roadmap to progress...
1
by: Sonnysonu | last post by:
This is the data of csv file 1 2 3 1 2 3 1 2 3 1 2 3 2 3 2 3 3 the lengths should be different i have to store the data by column-wise with in the specific length. suppose the i have to...
0
marktang
by: marktang | last post by:
ONU (Optical Network Unit) is one of the key components for providing high-speed Internet services. Its primary function is to act as an endpoint device located at the user's premises. However,...
0
by: Hystou | last post by:
Most computers default to English, but sometimes we require a different language, especially when relocating. Forgot to request a specific language before your computer shipped? No problem! You can...
0
Oralloy
by: Oralloy | last post by:
Hello folks, I am unable to find appropriate documentation on the type promotion of bit-fields when using the generalised comparison operator "<=>". The problem is that using the GNU compilers,...
0
jinu1996
by: jinu1996 | last post by:
In today's digital age, having a compelling online presence is paramount for businesses aiming to thrive in a competitive landscape. At the heart of this digital strategy lies an intricately woven...
0
tracyyun
by: tracyyun | last post by:
Dear forum friends, With the development of smart home technology, a variety of wireless communication protocols have appeared on the market, such as Zigbee, Z-Wave, Wi-Fi, Bluetooth, etc. Each...
0
agi2029
by: agi2029 | last post by:
Let's talk about the concept of autonomous AI software engineers and no-code agents. These AIs are designed to manage the entire lifecycle of a software development project—planning, coding, testing,...

By using Bytes.com and it's services, you agree to our Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.

To disable or enable advertisements and analytics tracking please visit the manage ads & tracking page.