468,512 Members | 1,485 Online
Bytes | Developer Community
New Post

Home Posts Topics Members FAQ

Post your question to a community of 468,512 developers. It's quick & easy.

How to organize files to write include?

Hi all

look at the organize tree

main.c
------
#include lib_adapter.c
main()
{
foo();
}
lib_adapter.c
-------------
#include "foo_liba.c"
#include "foo_libb.c"

void foo(){
#ifdef USING_LIBA
foo_liba()
#endif
#ifdef USING_LIBB
foo_libb()
#endif
}

void need();
lib_a.c
=======
void foo_liba()
{
need();
}

lib_b.c
-------
void foo_libb()
{
need()
}
gcc -o main main.c lib_adapter.c lib_a.c lib_b.c
the code can not be complained , what I want to know is

I can not put need() out side of the lib_adapter.c
1.how to write include structure
2.need I have to write .h file instead of include c file?

best regards
your key9


Sep 15 '06 #1
2 3140
key9 wrote:
Hi all

look at the organize tree
Sounds like a troll already.
Bad engrish, lack of caps, etc.
>
main.c
------
#include lib_adapter.c
main()
{
foo();
}
lib_adapter.c
-------------
#include "foo_liba.c"
#include "foo_libb.c"

void foo(){
#ifdef USING_LIBA
foo_liba()
#endif
#ifdef USING_LIBB
foo_libb()
#endif
}

void need();
lib_a.c
=======
void foo_liba()
{
need();
}

lib_b.c
-------
void foo_libb()
{
need()
}
gcc -o main main.c lib_adapter.c lib_a.c lib_b.c
some of the problems:

1. main should return an int.
2. Include files should not contain executable code.
You want to end up with one copy of each function,
and putting code in include files causes the function
to be expressed every time you include the file,
causing the linker to be upset about multiple definitions.
3. Include files should end in a '.h' extension.
It's a convention, and most C programmers expect it.
This allows for a 'cc *.c -o xxx' at the command line
to compile most simple programs.
4. Since lib_adapter.c, lib_a.c, and lib_b.c are all
included in main.c, why are you compiling them a
second time?
5. main should return a value.
6. need() is not implementated anywhere.
7. Neither "USING_LIBA" nor "USING_LIBB" are defined,
thus foo() is a null function.
8. need() is prototyped after use, instead of before.
....
the code can not be complained , what I want to know is
Why can't it be complained. I see lots of things to complain about.
What errors do you get? Are we supposed to guess?
>
I can not put need() out side of the lib_adapter.c
What happens when you try? What error do you get?
>

1.how to write include structure
2.need I have to write .h file instead of include c file?
You don't seem to really understand the purpose of
include files.

----== Posted via Newsfeeds.Com - Unlimited-Unrestricted-Secure Usenet News==----
http://www.newsfeeds.com The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World! 120,000+ Newsgroups
----= East and West-Coast Server Farms - Total Privacy via Encryption =----
Sep 15 '06 #2
key9 wrote:
Hi all

look at the organize tree

main.c
------
#include lib_adapter.c
Although omitting <or "" may work on your compiler, it is not conforming.
main()
{
foo();
}
lib_adapter.c
-------------
#include "foo_liba.c"
#include "foo_libb.c"

void foo(){
#ifdef USING_LIBA
foo_liba()
#endif
#ifdef USING_LIBB
foo_libb()
#endif
}

void need();
lib_a.c
=======
void foo_liba()
{
need();
}

lib_b.c
-------
void foo_libb()
{
need()
}
gcc -o main main.c lib_adapter.c lib_a.c lib_b.c
the code can not be complained , what I want to know is

I can not put need() out side of the lib_adapter.c
Do you mean that gcc does not give error messages or warnings? If not,
I can't interpret your comment.
1.how to write include structure
Questions should have a subject, verb, and end in a question mark, as
well as ask a question: "How can I include a structure in my program?"
That might not be the question you intended to ask. I think you are
asking about how to use #include statements in a program.

By convention, C programs are separated into code files and declaration
files. The code files contain function definitions and normally have an
extension of .c. The declaration files have declarations normally used
by multiple code files and have an extension of .h. These naming and
organizational conventions are not requirements of the language, though,
and compilers don't care what extensions are used on the files.

Normally .c files are each compiled into a separate object file, then
the object file are linked into a single executable file. In contrast,
I have used a C dialect compiler (for small microprocessors) that
requires all code files to be compiled together -- it cannot compile to
object files and link. For that compiler, it is typical to have a main
file include other code files. This is not recommended for normal use,
though.
2.need I have to write .h file instead of include c file?
No. In general you should compile code files separately and link them.
I recommend writing a header file for each code and placing the
prototypes (and other definitions required to use the code module) in
the associated header file. Then include the header file in both the
code file defining the functions and code files using the defined functions.

I suggest finding a good text book on C.

--
Thad
Sep 16 '06 #3

This discussion thread is closed

Replies have been disabled for this discussion.

Similar topics

10 posts views Thread by Bruce W...1 | last post: by
1 post views Thread by Jamal | last post: by
2 posts views Thread by key9 | last post: by
1 post views Thread by chellemybelle | last post: by
1 post views Thread by JRough | last post: by
reply views Thread by Dudeja, Rajat | last post: by
2 posts views Thread by Fredrik Lundh | last post: by
reply views Thread by NPC403 | last post: by
1 post views Thread by fmendoza | last post: by
By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.