thread.h is name pollution ?

>
Hi All,

Just illustrating my lack of C knowledge again:

Wot now ? cat test.c
#include <pthread.h>

void thread_init( void ){}

Wot now ? xlc_r -c -qlanglvl=stdc89 test.c
"test.c", line 3.6: 1506-343 (S) Redeclaration of thread_init differs from previous declaration on line 886 of "/usr/include/sys/thread.h".
"test.c", line 3.6: 1506-376 (I) Redeclaration of thread_init has a different number of fixed parameters than the previous declaration.
Wot now ? xlc_r -c -qlanglvl=stdc99 test.c
"test.c", line 3.6: 1506-343 (S) Redeclaration of thread_init differs from previous declaration on line 886 of "/usr/include/sys/thread.h".
"test.c", line 3.6: 1506-376 (I) Redeclaration of thread_init has a different number of fixed parameters than the previous declaration.

In sys/thread.h thread_init is declared as

void thread_init(unsigned long long, unsigned long long)

and the -qlanglvl flags above ask the compiler to at least report deviations
from the c89 and c99 standards respectively.

Is the implementation allowed by the standard to reserve this part of the namespace ?

>
Hi All,

Just illustrating my lack of C knowledge again:

Wot now ? cat test.c
#include <pthread.h>

void thread_init( void ){}

Wot now ? xlc_r -c -qlanglvl=stdc89 test.c
"test.c", line 3.6: 1506-343 (S) Redeclaration of thread_init differs from
previous declaration on line 886 of "/usr/include/sys/thread.h". "test.c",

>
In sys/thread.h thread_init is declared as

void thread_init(unsigned long long, unsigned long long)

and the -qlanglvl flags above ask the compiler to at least report
deviations from the c89 and c99 standards respectively.

Is the implementation allowed by the standard to reserve this part of the
namespace ?

Ian Bush said:

>>
Is the implementation allowed by the standard to reserve this part of the
namespace ?

No, unless you invite it to do so, by - for example - including a
non-standard header such as <pthread.h>.

Richard Heathfield wrote:

Ian Bush said:

>
Is the implementation allowed by the standard to reserve this part of the
namespace ?

No, unless you invite it to do so, by - for example - including a
non-standard header such as <pthread.h>.

Yeah, thanks Richard and Chris I should have realized that myself.

I'll have to see what pthreads says now,