473,320 Members | 1,876 Online
Bytes | Software Development & Data Engineering Community
Post Job

Home Posts Topics Members FAQ

Join Bytes to post your question to a community of 473,320 software developers and data experts.

In-memory construction of variant types/subclasses?

Hi, slowly transitioning from C to C++, I decided to remodel a
struct/union (i.e. type identifier as first field, union of variant
types) as a class + subclasses. Switching functions are replaced by
virtual functions. So far so good.

Now what I used to do is have a struct, set its type and union member,
and return a pointer. I.e. I initialized the struct appropriately and
returned a reference. Now I'd like to do that in C++ (right now I
construct a new subclass with "new" and delete it after every call,
because the instance is only needed very shortly anyway; seems ugly to me).

I tried to define a union that contains all subclasses (that I will ever
use) of the base class, but C++ complains that it can't have objects
with constructors or destructors inside a union.

Is there any way to have a static piece of storage, and to return
references/objects(by value) or pointers to this piece of storage, while
also initializing it (i.e. myunion.objectB = ObjectB(); return
myunion.objecTB; or something like that)? In C I didn't need malloc()
in this case; I don't see why I should need new() now.
Jul 2 '06 #1
9 2126
Could you please give some supporting code?
I'm afraid I couldn't follow what you're saying (starting from
the 2nd paragraph), even though I read the thing at least 3
times ;-)

Ulrich Hobelmann wrote:
Hi, slowly transitioning from C to C++, I decided to remodel a
struct/union (i.e. type identifier as first field, union of variant
types) as a class + subclasses. Switching functions are replaced by
virtual functions. So far so good.

Now what I used to do is have a struct, set its type and union member,
and return a pointer. I.e. I initialized the struct appropriately and
returned a reference. Now I'd like to do that in C++ (right now I
construct a new subclass with "new" and delete it after every call,
because the instance is only needed very shortly anyway; seems ugly to me).

I tried to define a union that contains all subclasses (that I will ever
use) of the base class, but C++ complains that it can't have objects
with constructors or destructors inside a union.

Is there any way to have a static piece of storage, and to return
references/objects(by value) or pointers to this piece of storage, while
also initializing it (i.e. myunion.objectB = ObjectB(); return
myunion.objecTB; or something like that)? In C I didn't need malloc()
in this case; I don't see why I should need new() now.
Jul 2 '06 #2
In article <4g*************@individual.net>, u.*********@web.de
says...

[ ... ]
Is there any way to have a static piece of storage, and to return
references/objects(by value) or pointers to this piece of storage, while
also initializing it (i.e. myunion.objectB = ObjectB(); return
myunion.objecTB; or something like that)? In C I didn't need malloc()
in this case; I don't see why I should need new() now.
Yes -- it's called placement new. You do something like:

static char buffer[4096]; // assume that's big enough...

your_class *object = new(buffer) your_class;

When you're done with this object, you don't delete it -- instead,
you call its dtor directly:

object->~your_class();

As far as being anything like malloc goes: no, it's not. malloc does
one thing: allocates raw memory. The usual use of new does two
things: allocates some memory (about like malloc), and then creates
an object in that memory.

Placement new does only the _second_ part of that. It doesn't
allocate any memory -- it just creates an object in the memory you
designate. You're still creating a new object, so (at least to me) it
makes perfect sense to use the "new" keyword, even though you're not
doing anything that corresponds to what malloc does.

--
Later,
Jerry.

The universe is a figment of its own imagination.
Jul 2 '06 #3
Hi,

Yes, look up 'in place new' on parashift.

Here is a piece of my Variant type code:

// in the header
union {
Int8 Char;
Int64 Long;
UInt8 UChar;
UInt64 ULong;
double Double;
bool Bool;
char String [ sizeof( std::string ) ];
char Map [ sizeof( std::map<UVar*,UVar*, UFindVar) ];
char SRefPtr[ sizeof( MSRefPtr<ISerialize) ];
char WRefPtr[ sizeof( MWRefPtr<ISerialize) ];
char KeyStroke[ sizeof( MKey ) ];
};

And then in the implementation if the variant is for instance string: (from
a piece of the copy constructor passed variable Var)

case eString:
new( this->String ) string( *reinterpret_cast<string const *const>(
Var.String ) );
break;

--
Make sure to set the alignment options for your compiler otherwise maybe
stuff could get misaligned i.e. on char istead of four byte boundary.

Regards, Ron AF Greve

http://moonlit.xs4all.nl

"Ulrich Hobelmann" <u.*********@web.dewrote in message
news:4g*************@individual.net...
Hi, slowly transitioning from C to C++, I decided to remodel a
struct/union (i.e. type identifier as first field, union of variant types)
as a class + subclasses. Switching functions are replaced by virtual
functions. So far so good.

Now what I used to do is have a struct, set its type and union member, and
return a pointer. I.e. I initialized the struct appropriately and
returned a reference. Now I'd like to do that in C++ (right now I
construct a new subclass with "new" and delete it after every call,
because the instance is only needed very shortly anyway; seems ugly to
me).

I tried to define a union that contains all subclasses (that I will ever
use) of the base class, but C++ complains that it can't have objects with
constructors or destructors inside a union.

Is there any way to have a static piece of storage, and to return
references/objects(by value) or pointers to this piece of storage, while
also initializing it (i.e. myunion.objectB = ObjectB(); return
myunion.objecTB; or something like that)? In C I didn't need malloc() in
this case; I don't see why I should need new() now.

Jul 2 '06 #4
Jerry Coffin posted:

static char buffer[4096]; // assume that's big enough...

That's not guaranteed to be suitably aligned.

--

Frederick Gotham
Jul 2 '06 #5
st************@gmail.com wrote:
Could you please give some supporting code?
I have a function that will return one of many subclasses of a base
class (so it can't be call-by-value, because the subclasses can have
different sizes). I don't want to use new(), because the object is only
used for a very short time. In C I simply had a union of appropriate
types, initialized one of them, and returned a pointer. In C++ I'd like
to return a reference (ok, doesn't matter really), but the union can't
contain a list of my subclasses, due to init/destruction issues it seems.

Jerry and Moonlit, thanks for the pointers. I could use placement new
(though it remains open how best to declare the memory area; A union
would free me from the chore of having to determine how big my objects
actually are), but I was completely ignoring that objects could have
destructors (ok, these don't, but still the idea seems a bit ugly).

I guess I'll just continue to go with new/delete. The few cycles
shouldn't hurt.
Jul 2 '06 #6
Ulrich Hobelmann schrieb:
Hi, slowly transitioning from C to C++, I decided to remodel a
struct/union (i.e. type identifier as first field, union of variant
types) as a class + subclasses. Switching functions are replaced by
virtual functions. So far so good.
You could try the placement-new way, but others have done it before:

http://www.boost.org/doc/html/variant.html

Thomas
Jul 3 '06 #7
In article <%e*******************@news.indigo.ie>, fg*******@SPAM.com
says...
Jerry Coffin posted:

static char buffer[4096]; // assume that's big enough...

That's not guaranteed to be suitably aligned.
True -- a bit of ugliness to attempt to keep the code as simple as
possible, and concentrate on the placement new part. You're right,
however, that I probably should have pointed out the limitations more
thoroughly. OTOH, hopefully the comment was enough to indicate that
this buffer was really only for demo, not real use...

--
Later,
Jerry.

The universe is a figment of its own imagination.
Jul 3 '06 #8
Jerry Coffin posted:
In article <%e*******************@news.indigo.ie>, fg*******@SPAM.com
says...
>Jerry Coffin posted:

static char buffer[4096]; // assume that's big enough...

That's not guaranteed to be suitably aligned.

True -- a bit of ugliness to attempt to keep the code as simple as
possible, and concentrate on the placement new part. You're right,
however, that I probably should have pointed out the limitations more
thoroughly. OTOH, hopefully the comment was enough to indicate that
this buffer was really only for demo, not real use...

Yes I see what you're getting at, try to keep the example as simple as
possible.

I myself like to throw in a little comment, maybe at that point in the
code, or perhaps afterwards down before my signature, something like:

static char buffer[64]; /* Let's pretend it's suitably aligned */
It's good to be pedantic.

--

Frederick Gotham
Jul 3 '06 #9
Thomas J. Gritzan wrote:
Ulrich Hobelmann schrieb:
>Hi, slowly transitioning from C to C++, I decided to remodel a
struct/union (i.e. type identifier as first field, union of variant
types) as a class + subclasses. Switching functions are replaced by
virtual functions. So far so good.

You could try the placement-new way, but others have done it before:

http://www.boost.org/doc/html/variant.html
Thanks, but that feels a bit more heavyweight than I planned to use.
Jul 3 '06 #10

This thread has been closed and replies have been disabled. Please start a new discussion.

Similar topics

3
by: Curious Expatriate | last post by:
Hi- I'm completely stumped. I'm trying to write some code that will parse a file and rewrite it with all URLs replaced by something else. For example: if the file looks like this: <b>click...
1
by: JS Bangs | last post by:
I started using PHP's object-oriented stuff a little while ago, which has mostly been a joy. However, I've noticed that they don't seem to echo as I would like. Eg: $this->field = 255;...
5
by: lawrence | last post by:
I've waited 6 weeks for an answer to my other question and still no luck, so let me rephrase the question. I know I can do this: <form method="post" action="$self"> <input type="text"...
0
by: Ben Eisenberg | last post by:
I'm trying to run a php script setuid. I've tried POSIX_setuid but you have to be root to run this. The files are located on a public access unix system and have me as the owner and nobody as the...
2
by: Felix | last post by:
Hi, I've a problem: I want to have the result of my Mysql Query in a Table in my php file. Now I've this: <?
1
by: James | last post by:
What is the best way to update a record in a MYSQL DB using a FORM and PHP ? Where ID = $ID ! Any examples or URLS ? Thanks
1
by: Patrick Schlaepfer | last post by:
Why this code is not working on Solaris 2.8 host. Always getting: PHP Fatal error: swfaction() : getURL('http://www.php.net' ^ Line 1: Reason: 'syntax error' in /.../htdocs/ming2.php on...
1
by: phpkid | last post by:
Howdy I've been given conflicting answers about search engines picking up urls like: http://mysite.com/index.php?var1=1&var2=2&var3=3 Do search engines pick up these urls? I've been considering...
1
by: lawrence | last post by:
What is the PHP equivalent of messaging, as in Java?
3
by: Quinten Carlson | last post by:
Is there a way to conditionally define a function in php? I'm trying to run a php page 10 times using the include statement, but I get an error because my function is already defined. The docs...
0
by: ryjfgjl | last post by:
ExcelToDatabase: batch import excel into database automatically...
1
isladogs
by: isladogs | last post by:
The next Access Europe meeting will be on Wednesday 6 Mar 2024 starting at 18:00 UK time (6PM UTC) and finishing at about 19:15 (7.15PM). In this month's session, we are pleased to welcome back...
0
by: Vimpel783 | last post by:
Hello! Guys, I found this code on the Internet, but I need to modify it a little. It works well, the problem is this: Data is sent from only one cell, in this case B5, but it is necessary that data...
0
by: jfyes | last post by:
As a hardware engineer, after seeing that CEIWEI recently released a new tool for Modbus RTU Over TCP/UDP filtering and monitoring, I actively went to its official website to take a look. It turned...
0
by: ArrayDB | last post by:
The error message I've encountered is; ERROR:root:Error generating model response: exception: access violation writing 0x0000000000005140, which seems to be indicative of an access violation...
0
by: Defcon1945 | last post by:
I'm trying to learn Python using Pycharm but import shutil doesn't work
0
by: Shællîpôpï 09 | last post by:
If u are using a keypad phone, how do u turn on JavaScript, to access features like WhatsApp, Facebook, Instagram....
0
by: af34tf | last post by:
Hi Guys, I have a domain whose name is BytesLimited.com, and I want to sell it. Does anyone know about platforms that allow me to list my domain in auction for free. Thank you
0
by: Faith0G | last post by:
I am starting a new it consulting business and it's been a while since I setup a new website. Is wordpress still the best web based software for hosting a 5 page website? The webpages will be...

By using Bytes.com and it's services, you agree to our Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.

To disable or enable advertisements and analytics tracking please visit the manage ads & tracking page.