By using this site, you agree to our updated Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Manage your Cookies Settings.
431,661 Members | 781 Online
Bytes IT Community
+ Ask a Question
Need help? Post your question and get tips & solutions from a community of 431,661 IT Pros & Developers. It's quick & easy.

Visual Basic for Applications

P: n/a
Visual Basic for
Applications(简称VBA)是新一代*准宏 *言。何谓宏,是指将应用程序*的一 列操作*记为代*的一种*言。然而 VBA还具有一般宏*言所不具备的特点 *为VB(Visual
Basic)本身就是一种高级*言,所以VBA 还具备一般高级*言的特征,可以用 从事专门的开发。

每一个使用过微软Office家族产品的用 都被其庞大的体积所困惑。但在这里 说的是,这么大的体积完全是有道理 的。不要认为Word就是一个简单的打* 件,Word其实是一个功能强大的文* 理和排版软件,使用Word完全可以排出 各种优美的*式,不要认为那离*很 远,实际上您每天面对的Word就是一个 专业的排版软件。
more see http://www.cdbook.cn/book.asp?id=2279
Apr 13 '06 #1
Share this Question
Share on Google+
12 Replies


P: n/a
run a backtrace

Apr 13 '06 #2

P: n/a

"Marco Costa" <ma*****************@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:11**********************@i40g2000cwc.googlegr oups.com...
run a backtrace


What?

Are you responding to that unreadable garbage (apparently about Visual
Basic)? How about 1) quoting what you're responding to, and 2) stating more
completely what you're talking about. (What's a "backtrace"... some Unix
utility? Something you saw on NCIS? :-))

-Howard
Apr 13 '06 #3

P: n/a

Howard wrote:
"Marco Costa" <ma*****************@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:11**********************@i40g2000cwc.googlegr oups.com...
run a backtrace


What?

Are you responding to that unreadable garbage (apparently about Visual
Basic)?


Just because you cannot read it, it does not mean it's garbage. Its
content is not appropriate for this group but calling something you
have no idea of as garbage is ignorant.

Apr 19 '06 #4

P: n/a

"Fei Liu" <fe*****@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:11*********************@z34g2000cwc.googlegro ups.com...

Howard wrote:
"Marco Costa" <ma*****************@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:11**********************@i40g2000cwc.googlegr oups.com...
> run a backtrace
>
What?

Are you responding to that unreadable garbage (apparently about Visual
Basic)?


Just because you cannot read it, it does not mean it's garbage.


That's exactly what it means. I wasn't commenting on the quality of the
question posted, but on the readability of what was posted. Unreadable text
is often referred to as garbage. Or gobbledygook. Or gibberish. In any
case, it's unreadable. (And I'm guessing it's off-topic, too.)
Its
content is not appropriate for this group but calling something you
have no idea of as garbage is ignorant.


Whatever.
Apr 19 '06 #5

P: n/a

Fei Liu wrote:
Howard wrote:
"Marco Costa" <ma*****************@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:11**********************@i40g2000cwc.googlegr oups.com...
run a backtrace


What?

Are you responding to that unreadable garbage (apparently about Visual
Basic)?


Just because you cannot read it, it does not mean it's garbage. Its
content is not appropriate for this group but calling something you
have no idea of as garbage is ignorant.


Howard's reader may not have the Hanyu fonts installed. This would
render the text as something akin to
SNTHENSHUO(*&987984,75l9'8,.pfula:QEFGu90 only worse. This _is_ an
english language newsgroup so nobody is expected to be able to render
Chinese, nor read it.

The fact that he doesn't know what a backtrace is has me wondering
though.

Apr 19 '06 #6

P: n/a

"Noah Roberts" <ro**********@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:11**********************@j33g2000cwa.googlegr oups.com...

Fei Liu wrote:
Howard wrote:
> "Marco Costa" <ma*****************@gmail.com> wrote in message
> news:11**********************@i40g2000cwc.googlegr oups.com...
> > run a backtrace
> >
>
> What?
>
> Are you responding to that unreadable garbage (apparently about Visual
> Basic)?
Just because you cannot read it, it does not mean it's garbage. Its
content is not appropriate for this group but calling something you
have no idea of as garbage is ignorant.


Howard's reader may not have the Hanyu fonts installed. This would
render the text as something akin to
SNTHENSHUO(*&987984,75l9'8,.pfula:QEFGu90 only worse. This _is_ an
english language newsgroup so nobody is expected to be able to render
Chinese, nor read it.


Ah, that explains the very odd characters I'm seeing!
The fact that he doesn't know what a backtrace is has me wondering
though.


I know the term, but I've never had to "run a backtrace". I know that the
call stack display in my IDEs' debuggers are sometimes referred to as a
"backtrace". But I suspect he's referring to a specific type of Unix
utility? Well, I don't do Unix, so that would explain that. :-)

(In any case, it's not much of a response to simply say "run a backtrace",
without any explanations, qualifications, or quoting of the message
responded to, is it?)

-Howard

Apr 19 '06 #7

P: n/a
Howard wrote:
(In any case, it's not much of a response to simply say "run a backtrace",
without any explanations, qualifications, or quoting of the message
responded to, is it?)


That's why off-topic messages suck. If it were on-topic, we'd have a good
reply at our fingertips, including a FAQ.

Howewer, off-topic posts are no excuse for impolite or low-quality replies.
Everyone should strive to write only posts they can be proud of. "Garbage"
is a poor choice of words because nobody can tell if the responder is
commenting on the quality of a post's topic, or the quality of its Unicode.

--
Phlip
http://www.greencheese.org/ZeekLand <-- NOT a blog!!!
Apr 19 '06 #8

P: n/a

Howard wrote:
"Noah Roberts" <ro**********@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:11**********************@j33g2000cwa.googlegr oups.com...
The fact that he doesn't know what a backtrace is has me wondering
though.


I know the term, but I've never had to "run a backtrace". I know that the
call stack display in my IDEs' debuggers are sometimes referred to as a
"backtrace". But I suspect he's referring to a specific type of Unix
utility? Well, I don't do Unix, so that would explain that. :-)


Actually, no, it isn't a Unix utility. Any debugger better be capable
of doing it. People that have never gone beyond certain IDEs might not
be aware of it though. There is a good reason why your "call stack"
window is often called a backtrace...if you see a call stack then
you've run a backtrace.
(In any case, it's not much of a response to simply say "run a backtrace",
without any explanations, qualifications, or quoting of the message
responded to, is it?)


Wasn't much of an OP...why you so worked up over it...was an obvious
joke. Grow a sense of humor.

Apr 20 '06 #9

P: n/a
Phlip wrote:

[snip]
Howewer, off-topic posts are no excuse for impolite or low-quality
replies.
Actually, they are: off-topic post are offending and therefore may trigger a
slightly emotional response. In as much as being impolite or just not being
perfect requires an excuse, the initial offense of an off-topic post
qualifies.

Everyone should strive to write only posts they can be proud of.


Which moral code are you using here? Seems to be an arbitrary standard to
me. People are and should be free to chose in which matters they strife for
perfection. And, from an ethical point of view, it is perfectly legitimate
a choice to consider posting on usenet a trivial matter that has little to
no bearing on ones personal growth.
[snip]

Best

Kai-Uwe Bux

Apr 20 '06 #10

P: n/a
Kai-Uwe Bux wrote:
Howewer, off-topic posts are no excuse for impolite or low-quality
replies.


Actually, they are: off-topic post are offending and therefore may trigger
a
slightly emotional response. In as much as being impolite or just not
being
perfect requires an excuse, the initial offense of an off-topic post
qualifies.


That is a kindergarten excuse - Evonne made me get mad at Zoe.

No she didn't. How could she _make_ you do _anything_??
Everyone should strive to write only posts they can be proud of.


Which moral code are you using here? Seems to be an arbitrary standard to
me. People are and should be free to chose in which matters they strife
for
perfection. And, from an ethical point of view, it is perfectly legitimate
a choice to consider posting on usenet a trivial matter that has little to
no bearing on ones personal growth.


I will remember this moment the next time I'm reviewing a resume.

--
Phlip
http://www.greencheese.org/ZeekLand <-- NOT a blog!!!
Apr 20 '06 #11

P: n/a
Phlip wrote:
Kai-Uwe Bux wrote:
Howewer, off-topic posts are no excuse for impolite or low-quality
replies.


Actually, they are: off-topic post are offending and therefore may
trigger a
slightly emotional response. In as much as being impolite or just not
being
perfect requires an excuse, the initial offense of an off-topic post
qualifies.


That is a kindergarten excuse - Evonne made me get mad at Zoe.

No she didn't. How could she _make_ you do _anything_??


You are misunderstanding what an "excuse" has to argue: you do not have to
argue that you are innocent or that what you were within your rights in
what you did; an excise just argues just that your behavior should be
forgiven -- not that it was right.

Everyone should strive to write only posts they can be proud of.


Which moral code are you using here? Seems to be an arbitrary standard to
me. People are and should be free to chose in which matters they strife
for
perfection. And, from an ethical point of view, it is perfectly
legitimate a choice to consider posting on usenet a trivial matter that
has little to no bearing on ones personal growth.


I will remember this moment the next time I'm reviewing a resume.


Huh?
Best

Kai-Uwe Bux
Apr 20 '06 #12

P: n/a
Kai-Uwe Bux wrote:
I will remember this moment the next time I'm reviewing a resume.


Huh?


This thread is reminding me to Google for people's names on resumes, to see
if they (or people with the same name) have an online presense.

--
Phlip
http://www.greencheese.org/ZeekLand <-- NOT a blog!!!
Apr 20 '06 #13

This discussion thread is closed

Replies have been disabled for this discussion.