Home Questions Articles Browse Topics Latest Top Members FAQ
c
eberhard janssen wrote: c Well, clearly not. The answer is 42, not 'c'.
eberhard janssen wrote: c Well, clearly not. The answer is 42, not 'c'. And at least one of your clock/date/timezone is wrong.
Ben Pope wrote: eberhard janssen wrote: c Well, clearly not. The answer is 42, not 'c'. And at least one of your clock/date/timezone is wrong. Why 42?
ro**********@gmail.com wrote: Ben Pope wrote: eberhard janssen wrote: c Well, clearly not. The answer is 42, not 'c'. And at least one of your clock/date/timezone is wrong. Why 42? If you don't like the answer, may I suggest a better question? Ben Pope -- I'm not just a number. To many, I'm known as a string...
eberhard janssen wrote: c Well, clearly not. The answer is 42, not 'c'. IMHO a more precise answer would be: 67 43 43 And at least one of your clock/date/timezone is wrong. Ben Pope -- I'm not just a number. To many, I'm known as a string...
c Well, clearly not. The answer is 42, not 'c'.
What was the question in the first place ?
Mathieu Pagé wrote: What was the question in the first place ? c
Ben Pope escreveu: eberhard janssen wrote: > c Well, clearly not. The answer is 42, not 'c'. IMHO a more precise answer would be: 67 43 43
eberhard janssen wrote: > c Well, clearly not. The answer is 42, not 'c'.
> c
Marcelo Pinto wrote: Ben Pope escreveu: eberhard janssen wrote: > c Well, clearly not. The answer is 42, not 'c'. IMHO a more precise answer would be: 67 43 43 Is that your phone number?
Replies have been disabled for this discussion.