On 2006-01-31, Michael Rasmussen <mi*@miras.org> wrote:
On Tue, 31 Jan 2006 21:02:21 +0100, Michael Mair wrote:
You may want to consider
http://groups.google.de/group/comp.l...ab9f767256334b
It is not correct: AFAIK gcc 4.x is C99 conforming.
For x <= 1:
variable-length arrays Broken
complex (and imaginary) support in <complex.h> Broken
extended identifiers Missing
library functions in <inttypes.h> Library Issue
extended integer types in <stdint.h> Missing
additional math library functions in <math.h> Library Issue Missing
floating-point environment access in <fenv.h> Library Issue
IEC 60559 (also known as IEC 559 or IEEE arithmetic) support Broken
inline functions Broken
additional predefined macro names Missing
standard pragmas Missing
deprecate ungetc at the beginning of a binary file Library Issue
The list looks pretty much the same on the "mainline CVS" page here:
http://gcc.gnu.org/c99status.html [4.1 page is linked from there]