If that project is not yours and you only have to compile it using
makfile .Any help is greatly appreciated.
Thanks, 7 1495
Nadia wrote: If that project is not yours and you only have to compile it using makfile .Any help is greatly appreciated.
Please include all of the question in the body of the message. Some
people use news readers that don't show the subject at the same time as
the message body.
In answer to your question, the only way the standard provides is to
read the files and see for yourself. However, there are lots of tools
people have written to assist with this, such as cxref. For a discussion
of tools available to your specific platform you would do well to ask in
a group dedicated to your platform as there you will find all the
experts who are familiar with the tools.
--
Flash Gordon
Living in interesting times.
Although my email address says spam, it is real and I read it.
In article <ti************@news.flash-gordon.me.uk>,
Flash Gordon <sp**@flash-gordon.me.uk> wrote: Nadia wrote: If that project is not yours and you only have to compile it using makfile .Any help is greatly appreciated.
Please include all of the question in the body of the message. Some people use news readers that don't show the subject at the same time as the message body.
You (and others, such as Keith) are wasting your breath. They'll never get
it. And I'll tell you why.
Imagine that there's a mouse - and the mouse is the Usenet. You and I can
see that it is a mouse and we behave accordingly. But now there is a class
of users (we'll call them "googlers") that are wearing these funny weird
glasses that make them see not a mouse, but an elephant. Seeing an
elephant (i.e., the Usenet as a web page), they also behave accordingly.
And no amount of verbiage from us is going to convince them that it's not
an elephant - that it is only a mouse.
To make this more clear, to a googler, it doesn't make any sense to "quote"
(whatever the heck that is...), in fact, to do so would be absurd, when all
the rest of the articles in the thread are right there in front of their
faces (just as clear as the trunk on that mouse, er, elephant). And no
amount of verbiage from us is going to convince them not to believe what
they see. The point is you can *never* convince someone that what they see
isn't reality. The only way you can address the problem is to help them
fix their eyesight (or help them remove their funny glasses).
On 2006-01-27, Kenny McCormack <ga*****@yin.interaccess.com> wrote: In article <ti************@news.flash-gordon.me.uk>, To make this more clear, to a googler, it doesn't make any sense to "quote" (whatever the heck that is...), in fact, to do so would be absurd, when all the rest of the articles in the thread are right there in front of their faces (just as clear as the trunk on that mouse, er, elephant). And no amount of verbiage from us is going to convince them not to believe what they see. The point is you can *never* convince someone that what they see isn't reality. The only way you can address the problem is to help them fix their eyesight (or help them remove their funny glasses).
Except that quoting is the norm on most web forums also, so it makes
more sense that the reason is the fact that the "reply" button doesn't
quote, or that the user is just an idiot
(i know, i know, don't feed the troll - the problem with that for me is
that i think that Kenny really does honestly believe what he is saying)
In article <sl***********************@random.yi.org>,
Jordan Abel <ra*******@gmail.com> wrote: On 2006-01-27, Kenny McCormack <ga*****@yin.interaccess.com> wrote: In article <ti************@news.flash-gordon.me.uk>, To make this more clear, to a googler, it doesn't make any sense to "quote" (whatever the heck that is...), in fact, to do so would be absurd, when all the rest of the articles in the thread are right there in front of their faces (just as clear as the trunk on that mouse, er, elephant). And no amount of verbiage from us is going to convince them not to believe what they see. The point is you can *never* convince someone that what they see isn't reality. The only way you can address the problem is to help them fix their eyesight (or help them remove their funny glasses).
Except that quoting is the norm on most web forums also, so it makes more sense that the reason is the fact that the "reply" button doesn't quote, or that the user is just an idiot
(i know, i know, don't feed the troll - the problem with that for me is that i think that Kenny really does honestly believe what he is saying)
Yes, I do honestly believe it. It is called "trolling on the square".
To address your issue: It is *not* the norm, in the real world, as it
exists in 2006. It may be the norm on the "web forums" that *you*
frequent, since you appear to be reasonably technically savvy and the
forums that *you* frequent probably are reasonably technically
sophisticated and are thus probably governed by the same ethos as was
common in the Usenet of old - the one that we all grew up with, but is,
alas, no more.
Note also that it varies by software. Some "web forums" (shouldn't that be
fora?) do encourage "quoting" (by "encourage", I mean, the nature of the
software, not the ethos of the participants), but the Google interface
(have you actually seen it?) is particularly good at making you think that
it all just strings together (exists as a unit) and that "quoting" would be
not only superfluous, but silly.
Jordan Abel <ra*******@gmail.com> writes: On 2006-01-27, Kenny McCormack <ga*****@yin.interaccess.com> wrote:
[the usual nonsense] Except that quoting is the norm on most web forums also, so it makes more sense that the reason is the fact that the "reply" button doesn't quote, or that the user is just an idiot
(i know, i know, don't feed the troll - the problem with that for me is that i think that Kenny really does honestly believe what he is saying)
Yes, please don't feed the troll. It doesn't matter whether he
honestly believes it or not. If you want to try to enlighten him for
some reason, you can use e-mail.
--
Keith Thompson (The_Other_Keith) ks***@mib.org <http://www.ghoti.net/~kst>
San Diego Supercomputer Center <*> <http://users.sdsc.edu/~kst>
We must do something. This is something. Therefore, we must do this.
On 2006-01-28, Kenny McCormack <ga*****@yin.interaccess.com> wrote: In article <sl***********************@random.yi.org>, Jordan Abel <ra*******@gmail.com> wrote:On 2006-01-27, Kenny McCormack <ga*****@yin.interaccess.com> wrote: In article <ti************@news.flash-gordon.me.uk>, To make this more clear, to a googler, it doesn't make any sense to "quote" (whatever the heck that is...), in fact, to do so would be absurd, when all the rest of the articles in the thread are right there in front of their faces (just as clear as the trunk on that mouse, er, elephant). And no amount of verbiage from us is going to convince them not to believe what they see. The point is you can *never* convince someone that what they see isn't reality. The only way you can address the problem is to help them fix their eyesight (or help them remove their funny glasses). Except that quoting is the norm on most web forums also, so it makes more sense that the reason is the fact that the "reply" button doesn't quote, or that the user is just an idiot
(i know, i know, don't feed the troll - the problem with that for me is that i think that Kenny really does honestly believe what he is saying)
Yes, I do honestly believe it. It is called "trolling on the square".
To address your issue: It is *not* the norm, in the real world, as it exists in 2006. It may be the norm on the "web forums" that *you* frequent, since you appear to be reasonably technically savvy and the forums that *you* frequent probably are reasonably technically sophisticated
Actually, no. The forum i'm talking about is "gaia online". Quoting is
actually more useful there than on usenet because there's NO other way
to find out who someone is replying to [usenet at least has a references
header, and many usenet interfaces also provide a tree view] on a
flat-thread UBB-type forum (which is what i was referring to as a "web
forum", and, apart from blogs, are the overwhelming majority of "web
forums"). Thus quoting is the norm on such forums.
and are thus probably governed by the same ethos as was common in the Usenet of old - the one that we all grew up with, but is, alas, no more.
75% of the people there, and 90% anywhere but one particular subforum,
have probably never heard of google groups, let alone usenet. Note also that it varies by software. Some "web forums" (shouldn't that be fora?) do encourage "quoting" (by "encourage", I mean, the nature of the software, not the ethos of the participants), but the Google interface (have you actually seen it?) is particularly good at making you think that it all just strings together (exists as a unit) and that "quoting" would be not only superfluous, but silly.
The only real problem with google is the presence of a "reply without
quoting" button, and its relative prominence vs the "reply with quote"
button. Fix this, and the problem will go away. Only to be replaced with
top-posting, i'm sure, but still.
On 2006-01-28, Keith Thompson <ks***@mib.org> wrote: Jordan Abel <ra*******@gmail.com> writes: On 2006-01-27, Kenny McCormack <ga*****@yin.interaccess.com> wrote: [the usual nonsense] Except that quoting is the norm on most web forums also, so it makes more sense that the reason is the fact that the "reply" button doesn't quote, or that the user is just an idiot
(i know, i know, don't feed the troll - the problem with that for me is that i think that Kenny really does honestly believe what he is saying)
Yes, please don't feed the troll. It doesn't matter whether he honestly believes it or not. If you want to try to enlighten him for some reason, you can use e-mail.
I hadn't thought of that. Sorry, I already replied to him once more, but
for future conversation I will take it to email [though, the ball is in
his court, so he really should first] This thread has been closed and replies have been disabled. Please start a new discussion. Similar topics
by: Jan van Mansum |
last post by:
Hello group,
I have just been trying out the log4j library. As far as I understand
the idea is to keep the logging statements in your, even in the release
build. However, obviously you wouldn't...
|
by: bettervssremoting |
last post by:
To view the full article, please visit
http://www.BetterVssRemoting.com
Better VSS Remote Access Tool
This article makes a detailed comparison among SourceAnyWhere,
SourceOffSite, VSS...
|
by: Alex |
last post by:
Hello,
in my company, we have a diagnostic tool for hardware. Depending on the
hardware projcet, a different project configuration is needed. The
configuration file is written in XML and...
|
by: mayamorning123 |
last post by:
A comparison among six VSS remote tools including SourceOffSite ,
SourceAnyWhere, VSS Connect, SourceXT, VSS Remoting, VSS.NET
To view the full article, please visit...
|
by: Derek |
last post by:
As I understand it there is a good amount of link compatibility
among C compilers. For example, I can compile main.c with GCC
and func.c with Sun One and link the objects using either linker
(GNU...
|
by: Richard K |
last post by:
Is it possible to share a single source file among two or more Projects in a
Solution?
I'm not talking about a DLL, just a .vb file that might contain a class or
module with common code to be...
|
by: Nadia |
last post by:
Hi,
How can to you find the dependencies among c files , if you have to
compile someone else's project . I heard about make depend , but dont
know how to use it.
Any help will be greatly...
|
by: RedJoy |
last post by:
I am trying to "clean up" a solution with 10 projects and I was wondering if
there is a way to "traverse" the source files to find not only the #includes
but also remove #includes that are not...
|
by: Olumide |
last post by:
Hello,
I've got this nice inner class that I'm holds a set of "FrontPoint"
objects as shown below. Unfortunately, the find and insert methods
trigger massive C2784 errors. Would someone please...
|
by: ryjfgjl |
last post by:
ExcelToDatabase: batch import excel into database automatically...
|
by: isladogs |
last post by:
The next Access Europe meeting will be on Wednesday 6 Mar 2024 starting at 18:00 UK time (6PM UTC) and finishing at about 19:15 (7.15PM).
In this month's session, we are pleased to welcome back...
|
by: isladogs |
last post by:
The next Access Europe meeting will be on Wednesday 6 Mar 2024 starting at 18:00 UK time (6PM UTC) and finishing at about 19:15 (7.15PM).
In this month's session, we are pleased to welcome back...
|
by: Vimpel783 |
last post by:
Hello!
Guys, I found this code on the Internet, but I need to modify it a little. It works well, the problem is this: Data is sent from only one cell, in this case B5, but it is necessary that data...
|
by: PapaRatzi |
last post by:
Hello,
I am teaching myself MS Access forms design and Visual Basic. I've created a table to capture a list of Top 30 singles and forms to capture new entries. The final step is a form (unbound)...
|
by: CloudSolutions |
last post by:
Introduction:
For many beginners and individual users, requiring a credit card and email registration may pose a barrier when starting to use cloud servers. However, some cloud server providers now...
|
by: Shællîpôpï 09 |
last post by:
If u are using a keypad phone, how do u turn on JavaScript, to access features like WhatsApp, Facebook, Instagram....
|
by: af34tf |
last post by:
Hi Guys, I have a domain whose name is BytesLimited.com, and I want to sell it. Does anyone know about platforms that allow me to list my domain in auction for free. Thank you
|
by: isladogs |
last post by:
The next Access Europe User Group meeting will be on Wednesday 3 Apr 2024 starting at 18:00 UK time (6PM UTC+1) and finishing by 19:30 (7.30PM).
In this session, we are pleased to welcome former...
| |