The bad coder joke =D

[Skybuck Flying]

Some coders don't need an obfuscator, they are the obfuscator.

Bye,
Skybuck =D

[Skybuck Flying]

Now comes the real joke =D

Their code is so fucked up that even today's obfuscators will improve their
code, go figure ;)

Bye,
Skybuck =D

"Skybuck Flying" <sp**@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:43********************@dreader2.news.tiscali. nl...

Some coders don't need an obfuscator, they are the obfuscator.

Bye,
Skybuck =D

[Chuck F.]

Skybuck Flying wrote:

Now comes the real joke =D

Their code is so fucked up that even today's obfuscators will
improve their code, go figure ;)

Bye, Skybuck =D

"Skybuck Flying" <sp**@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:43********************@dreader2.news.tiscali. nl...

Some coders don't need an obfuscator, they are the obfuscator.

You are not amusing, you are cross-posting excessively without even
setting followups, and you are top-posting. Enough is enough. PLONK.

--
"If you want to post a followup via groups.google.com, don't use
the broken "Reply" link at the bottom of the article. Click on
"show options" at the top of the article, then click on the
"Reply" at the bottom of the article headers." - Keith Thompson
More details at: <http://cfaj.freeshell.org/google/>

[Skybuck Flying]

"Chuck F. " <cb********@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:C5******************************@maineline.ne t...

Skybuck Flying wrote:

Now comes the real joke =D

Their code is so fucked up that even today's obfuscators will
improve their code, go figure ;)

Bye, Skybuck =D

"Skybuck Flying" <sp**@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:43********************@dreader2.news.tiscali. nl...

Some coders don't need an obfuscator, they are the obfuscator.

You are not amusing, you are cross-posting excessively without even
setting followups, and you are top-posting. Enough is enough. PLONK.

I thought you were funny until I noticed you set the follow up to
alt.dev.null.

You bad bad bad boy need a spanking ! hahahahahahahahaha.

Please don't be ashamed if you one of those bad coders, everybody was a
newby ! ;)

Bye,
Skybuck.

[Jamie]

Skybuck Flying wrote:

Some coders don't need an obfuscator, they are the obfuscator.

Bye,
Skybuck =D

hmm, i don't get it how ever i do understand this.

"There are 10 kinds of coders, those that understand binary
and those that don't"
--
Real Programmers Do things like this.
http://webpages.charter.net/jamie_5

[Randy Yates]

Jamie <ja**********************************@charter.ne t> writes:

[...]
"There are 10 kinds of coders, those that understand binary
and those that don't"

:)
--
% Randy Yates % "Maybe one day I'll feel her cold embrace,
%% Fuquay-Varina, NC % and kiss her interface,
%%% 919-577-9882 % til then, I'll leave her alone."
%%%% <ya***@ieee.org> % 'Yours Truly, 2095', *Time*, ELO
http://home.earthlink.net/~yatescr

[JustBoo]

On Sun, 15 Jan 2006 09:59:26 -0800, Jamie
<ja**********************************@charter.ne t> wrote:

"There are 10 kinds of coders, those that understand binary
and those that don't"

To understand recursion you have to understand recursion.

[Luc The Perverse]

"Jamie" <ja**********************************@charter.ne t> wrote in message
news:tf*****************@fe02.lga...

Skybuck Flying wrote:

Some coders don't need an obfuscator, they are the obfuscator.

Bye,
Skybuck =D

hmm, i don't get it

You need to read the subject line - the joke is an ambiguity. Is it a
(Bad Coder) Joke or a Bad (Coder Joke)

--
LTP

:)

[Luc The Perverse]

"JustBoo" <Ju*****@BooWho.com> wrote in message
news:0n********************************@4ax.com...

On Sun, 15 Jan 2006 09:59:26 -0800, Jamie
<ja**********************************@charter.ne t> wrote:

"There are 10 kinds of coders, those that understand binary
and those that don't"

To understand recursion you have to understand recursion.

LOL that is the best

-
LTP

:)

[Roedy Green]

On Sun, 15 Jan 2006 11:35:39 -0700, "Luc The Perverse"
<sl***********************@cc.usu.edu> wrote, quoted or indirectly
quoted someone who said :

To understand recursion you have to understand recursion.

LOL that is the best

see http://mindprod.com/jgloss/endlessloop.html
--
Canadian Mind Products, Roedy Green.
http://mindprod.com Java custom programming, consulting and coaching.

[Gernot Frisch]

You need to read the subject line - the joke is an ambiguity. Is
it a
(Bad Coder) Joke or a Bad (Coder Joke)

In C++ operations are evaluated from left to right, thus:
(Bad Coder) Joke

[Skybuck Flying]

Ok Jamie :)

I'll explain it to you ;)

Obfuscating means to make something hard or impossible to understand.

Question: What is the purpose of language ?

Probable answer: To communicate something.

Question: What is the purpose of a progamming language ?

Probable answer: To instruct the computer to do something.

However I like to be able to read my own code a few years from now.

So writing hard or impossible to understand code is bad in my book ;)

I believe C to be a bad programming language because of this believe ;)

The real joke is ofcourse on the C programmers who continue up until this
day to write hard/impossible to understand code.

Even microsoft's army of thousands of C programmers are biting the dust.

See security issues :)

Bye,
Skybuck.

"Jamie" <ja**********************************@charter.ne t> wrote in message
news:tf*****************@fe02.lga...

Skybuck Flying wrote:

Some coders don't need an obfuscator, they are the obfuscator.

Bye,
Skybuck =D

hmm, i don't get it how ever i do understand this.

"There are 10 kinds of coders, those that understand binary
and those that don't"
--
Real Programmers Do things like this.
http://webpages.charter.net/jamie_5

[Mike Smith]

Skybuck Flying wrote:

Ok Jamie :)

I'll explain it to you ;)

Um, any joke that needs to be explained...

--
Mike "don't give up your day job" Smith

[Skybuck Flying]

"Mike Smith" <mi*****************@acm.org> wrote in message
news:11*************@news.supernews.com...

Skybuck Flying wrote:

Ok Jamie :)

I'll explain it to you ;)
Um, any joke that needs to be explained...

is an educational joke ! ;)

Bye,
Skybuck =D

--
Mike "don't give up your day job" Smith

[Thomas Fritsch]

Jamie wrote:

"There are 10 kinds of coders, those that understand binary
and those that don't"

There are 3 kinds of mathematician: those that can count, and those that
cannot.

There are 2 kinds of software: software with no obvious bugs, and
software with obviously no bugs.

--
"Thomas:Fritsch$ops:de".replace(':','.').replace(' $','@')

[Skybuck Flying]

I have sent two abuses to your internet provider Chuck F.

One for this post and one for the post in my dream pc post.

Since you probably sent an abuse to my internet provider.

So you see, I am taking actions against your flat out lies !

There is even a word for it SLANDER !

Bye,
Bye,
Skybuck.

"Skybuck Flying" <sp**@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:43********************@dreader2.news.tiscali. nl...

"Chuck F. " <cb********@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:C5******************************@maineline.ne t...

Skybuck Flying wrote:

Now comes the real joke =D

Their code is so fucked up that even today's obfuscators will
improve their code, go figure ;)

Bye, Skybuck =D

"Skybuck Flying" <sp**@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:43********************@dreader2.news.tiscali. nl...
> Some coders don't need an obfuscator, they are the obfuscator.

You are not amusing, you are cross-posting excessively without even
setting followups, and you are top-posting. Enough is enough. PLONK.

I thought you were funny until I noticed you set the follow up to
alt.dev.null.

You bad bad bad boy need a spanking ! hahahahahahahahaha.

Please don't be ashamed if you one of those bad coders, everybody was a
newby ! ;)

Bye,
Skybuck.

[Al Balmer]

On Wed, 18 Jan 2006 22:36:28 +0100, "Skybuck Flying"
<sp**@hotmail.com> wrote:

So you see, I am taking actions against your flat out lies !

I'm taking action, too. One more entry for the kill file.

--
Al Balmer
Sun City, AZ

[Mike Wahler]

"Skybuck Flying" <sp**@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:43********************@dreader2.news.tiscali. nl...

I have sent two abuses to your internet provider Chuck F.

One for this post and one for the post in my dream pc post.

Since you probably sent an abuse to my internet provider.

So you see, I am taking actions against your flat out lies !

There is even a word for it SLANDER !

This poor troll. Doesn't know the meaning of the
word 'slander', nor the difference between slander
and libel. Also, when challenged, uses shouting
in place of reason.

-Mike

[Keith Thompson]

___________________
/| /| | |
||__|| | Please do |
/ O O\__ NOT |
/ \ feed the |
/ \ \ trolls |
/ _ \ \ ______________|
/ |\____\ \ ||
/ | | | |\____/ ||
/ \|_|_|/ \ __||
/ / \ |____| ||
/ | | /| | --|
| | |// |____ --|
* _ | |_|_|_| | \-/
*-- _--\ _ \ // |
/ _ \\ _ // | /
* / \_ /- | - | |
* ___ c_c_c_C/ \C_c_c_c____________

--
Keith Thompson (The_Other_Keith) ks***@mib.org <http://www.ghoti.net/~kst>
San Diego Supercomputer Center <*> <http://users.sdsc.edu/~kst>
We must do something. This is something. Therefore, we must do this.

[Skybuck Flying]

Take a look at this:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikiped...ration/Chuck_F

Chuck F. has been causing major problems for WikiPedia !

Bay Boy Chuck, Bad Boy ! =D

Bye,
Skybuck.

"Al Balmer" <al******@att.net> wrote in message
news:g2********************************@4ax.com...

On Wed, 18 Jan 2006 22:36:28 +0100, "Skybuck Flying"
<sp**@hotmail.com> wrote:

So you see, I am taking actions against your flat out lies !

I'm taking action, too. One more entry for the kill file.

--
Al Balmer
Sun City, AZ

[Skybuck Flying]

"Mike Wahler" <mk******@mkwahler.net> wrote in message
news:3n*****************@newsread2.news.pas.earthl ink.net...

"Skybuck Flying" <sp**@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:43********************@dreader2.news.tiscali. nl...

I have sent two abuses to your internet provider Chuck F.

One for this post and one for the post in my dream pc post.

Since you probably sent an abuse to my internet provider.

So you see, I am taking actions against your flat out lies !

There is even a word for it SLANDER !

This poor troll. Doesn't know the meaning of the
word 'slander', nor the difference between slander
and libel. Also, when challenged, uses shouting
in place of reason.

I am not a troll ! Maybe you are a troll ?

The difference between slander and libel is minor.

See www.dictionary.com

Bye,
Skybuck.

[Randy Howard]

Skybuck Flying wrote
(in article <43********************@dreader2.news.tiscali.nl>) :

Take a look at this:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikiped...ration/Chuck_F

Chuck F. has been causing major problems for WikiPedia !

Doesn't sound like "our" Chuck. He seems anything but
Libertarian in the few posts where he mentions politics. Either
way, it is off-topic, as just about everything you have ever
posted is.

For the regulars that seem so enamored with following up to this
guy, just check the archive for posts by Skybuck Flying. He has
been stirring up this sort of dust storm in various groups for
years. This is nothing new, and you are wasting your time
taking him seriously.
--
Randy Howard (2reply remove FOOBAR)
"The power of accurate observation is called cynicism by those
who have not got it." - George Bernard Shaw
How 'bout them Horns?

[Alan Brown]

"Gernot Frisch" <[e-mail]> wrote in news:43185pF1k7j71U1
@individual.net:

You need to read the subject line - the joke is an ambiguity. Is
it a
(Bad Coder) Joke or a Bad (Coder Joke)

In C++ operations are evaluated from left to right, thus:
(Bad Coder) Joke

However, if (s)he is a bad coder (s)he would not know that.

So it would be read Bad (Coder Joke)

:)

Alan

[Alan Brown]

"Skybuck Flying" <sp**@hotmail.com> wrote in news:43ce55b8$0$741$5fc3050
@dreader2.news.tiscali.nl:

"Mike Smith" <mi*****************@acm.org> wrote in message
news:11*************@news.supernews.com...

Skybuck Flying wrote:

> Ok Jamie :)
>
> I'll explain it to you ;)

Um, any joke that needs to be explained...

is an educational joke ! ;)

Bye,
Skybuck =D

--
Mike "don't give up your day job" Smith

To paraphrase your original posting

"Some JOKERS don't need an obfuscator, they are the obfuscator."

:))

Alan