OS dependent

[Realos Osis]

It is very much operating system dependent.

Please read up FAQ on http://www.faqs.org/faqs/C-faq/faq/

Section "19.4: How can I clear the screen?"

regards,

Realos

[Christopher Benson-Manica]

Realos Osis <re****@loftmail.com> wrote:

It is very much operating system dependent.

What is? You've included no context with your message, so no one has
a clue to whom you're speaking.

--
Christopher Benson-Manica | I *should* know what I'm talking about - if I
ataru(at)cyberspace.org | don't, I need to know. Flames welcome.

[Richard Heathfield]

Christopher Benson-Manica said:

Realos Osis <re****@loftmail.com> wrote:

It is very much operating system dependent.

What is? You've included no context with your message, so no one has
a clue to whom you're speaking.

That isn't true. Some people read Usenet using a threaded view. Others
don't, of course. So, strictly, it is only *some* people don't have a clue
to whom he's speaking. (Myself included, since I rarely bother to use
threaded views.)

--
Richard Heathfield
"Usenet is a strange place" - dmr 29/7/1999
http://www.cpax.org.uk
email: rjh at above domain (but drop the www, obviously)

[Walter Roberson]

In article <dn**********@nwrdmz02.dmz.ncs.ea.ibs-infra.bt.com>,
Richard Heathfield <in*****@invalid.invalid> wrote:

Christopher Benson-Manica said:

Realos Osis <re****@loftmail.com> wrote:

It is very much operating system dependent.

What is? You've included no context with your message, so no one has
a clue to whom you're speaking.

That isn't true. Some people read Usenet using a threaded view. Others
don't, of course. So, strictly, it is only *some* people don't have a clue
to whom he's speaking. (Myself included, since I rarely bother to use
threaded views.)

The original posting was not threaded. It isn't just a case of it
being a reply to something that wasn't received: if you examine the
References: headers, you will see that the original posting doesn't
reference anything.

So this really is a case where unless you have read most postings and
can figure out where the screen clearing reference fit into something,
that you are highly unlikely to have any clue what the original poster
of this thread was talking about.
--
I was very young in those days, but I was also rather dim.
-- Christopher Priest

[Flash Gordon]

Richard Heathfield wrote:

Christopher Benson-Manica said:

Realos Osis <re****@loftmail.com> wrote:

It is very much operating system dependent.

What is? You've included no context with your message, so no one has
a clue to whom you're speaking.

That isn't true. Some people read Usenet using a threaded view. Others
don't, of course. So, strictly, it is only *some* people don't have a clue
to whom he's speaking. (Myself included, since I rarely bother to use
threaded views.)

In this case a threaded view does not help since the post from Realos
Osis was done as the start of a new thread, not a reply to an existing
message.
--
Flash Gordon
Living in interesting times.
Although my email address says spam, it is real and I read it.

[Richard Heathfield]

Flash Gordon said:

In this case a threaded view does not help since the post from Realos
Osis was done as the start of a new thread, not a reply to an existing
message.

Oops. So it was. Perhaps I should have switched to threaded view before, or
rather instead of, opening my mouth and inserting my foot.

--
Richard Heathfield
"Usenet is a strange place" - dmr 29/7/1999
http://www.cpax.org.uk
email: rjh at above domain (but drop the www, obviously)

[Default User]

Richard Heathfield wrote:

Christopher Benson-Manica said:

Realos Osis <re****@loftmail.com> wrote:

It is very much operating system dependent.

What is? You've included no context with your message, so no one
has a clue to whom you're speaking.

That isn't true. Some people read Usenet using a threaded view.
Others don't, of course. So, strictly, it is only some people don't
have a clue to whom he's speaking. (Myself included, since I rarely
bother to use threaded views.)

Or people who use threaded views but don't display previously read
messages. I'm set to only show unread messages, so if the original and
reply are from different "sessions" they don't show for me. I can
switch the view on the fly, but I usually won't.

Brian

--
Please quote enough of the previous message for context. To do so from
Google, click "show options" and use the Reply shown in the expanded
header.

[Eric Sosman]

Richard Heathfield wrote:

Flash Gordon said:

In this case a threaded view does not help since the post from Realos
Osis was done as the start of a new thread, not a reply to an existing
message.

Oops. So it was. Perhaps I should have switched to threaded view before, or
rather instead of, opening my mouth and inserting my foot.

To help yourself remember, tie a string around your
fing-- um, your toe.

--
Eric Sosman
es*****@acm-dot-org.invalid