Hi. Should I jump right into C++, or is it better to learn C first?
I'm not a total beginner; I know Javascript, but I obviously would like
to learn a more powerful language.
Thanks,
TP 32 1998
Tony Polson wrote: Hi. Should I jump right into C++, or is it better to learn C first? I'm not a total beginner; I know Javascript, but I obviously would like to learn a more powerful language.
Note to newbies (and the unobservant!):
Please note that the above is just flame bait. The followups in the
original message demonstrate this. No point replying to his nonsense.
"Tony Polson" <to*********@uku.co.uk> wrote... Hi. Should I jump right into C++, or is it better to learn C first?
Jump right into C++. Only learn C if you want to learn C.
I'm not a total beginner; I know Javascript, but I obviously would like to learn a more powerful language.
Obviously. Why you set your follow-ups to photography newsgroups is
still a mystery though. Trolling?
V
infobahn wrote: Please note that the above is just flame bait. The followups in the original message demonstrate this. No point replying to his nonsense.
What origininal message?
Noah Roberts wrote: infobahn wrote:
Please note that the above is just flame bait. The followups in the original message demonstrate this. No point replying to his nonsense.
What origininal message?
Oh, okay, you obviously have better filters than me. Sorry for the
noise.
"infobahn" <in******@btinternet.com> wrote... Noah Roberts wrote: infobahn wrote:
> Please note that the above is just flame bait. The followups in the > original message demonstrate this. No point replying to his nonsense.
What origininal message?
Oh, okay, you obviously have better filters than me. Sorry for the noise.
It has nothing to do with filters. You changed the Subject header of
the message, and some newsreaders, like Outlook Express, do not put it
in the same thread. They make it seem that you started another thread.
Just FYI...
Victor Bazarov wrote: It has nothing to do with filters. You changed the Subject header of the message, and some newsreaders, like Outlook Express, do not put it in the same thread. They make it seem that you started another thread. Just FYI...
Hmm...nope. Original post not here. Maybe it hasn't arrived yet. Or
maybe Tony is a well known troll and has gotten himself deleted from
newsservers.
Victor Bazarov wrote: "infobahn" <in******@btinternet.com> wrote... Noah Roberts wrote: infobahn wrote:
Please note that the above is just flame bait. The followups in the original message demonstrate this. No point replying to his nonsense.
What origininal message?
Oh, okay, you obviously have better filters than me. Sorry for the noise.
It has nothing to do with filters. You changed the Subject header of the message, and some newsreaders, like Outlook Express, do not put it in the same thread. They make it seem that you started another thread. Just FYI...
I didn't realize OE was that bad. So it is too stupid to follow
the references chain?
--
"If you want to post a followup via groups.google.com, don't use
the broken "Reply" link at the bottom of the article. Click on
"show options" at the top of the article, then click on the
"Reply" at the bottom of the article headers." - Keith Thompson
"CBFalconer" <cb********@yahoo.com> wrote... [...] I didn't realize OE was that bad. So it is too stupid to follow the references chain?
I don't think "stupid" is applicable to programs. Software cannot
be smart or stupid, it only does what it's designed and programmed
to do, and always _precisely_ that.
"CBFalconer" <cb********@yahoo.com> schrieb im Newsbeitrag
news:42***************@yahoo.com... Victor Bazarov wrote: "infobahn" <in******@btinternet.com> wrote... Noah Roberts wrote: infobahn wrote:
> Please note that the above is just flame bait. The followups in the > original message demonstrate this. No point replying to his nonsense.
What origininal message?
Oh, okay, you obviously have better filters than me. Sorry for the noise.
It has nothing to do with filters. You changed the Subject header of the message, and some newsreaders, like Outlook Express, do not put it in the same thread. They make it seem that you started another thread. Just FYI...
I didn't realize OE was that bad. So it is too stupid to follow the references chain?
-- "If you want to post a followup via groups.google.com, don't use the broken "Reply" link at the bottom of the article. Click on "show options" at the top of the article, then click on the "Reply" at the bottom of the article headers." - Keith Thompson
No, works just fine.
In article <42***************@yahoo.com>,
CBFalconer <cb********@worldnet.att.net> wrote: Victor Bazarov wrote: "infobahn" <in******@btinternet.com> wrote... Noah Roberts wrote: infobahn wrote:
> Please note that the above is just flame bait. The followups in the > original message demonstrate this. No point replying to his nonsense.
What origininal message?
Oh, okay, you obviously have better filters than me. Sorry for the noise.
It has nothing to do with filters. You changed the Subject header of the message, and some newsreaders, like Outlook Express, do not put it in the same thread. They make it seem that you started another thread. Just FYI...
I didn't realize OE was that bad. So it is too stupid to follow the references chain?
The problem is that between people accessing Usenet via "Google" and via
various MS products, very few people actually use newsreaders anymore.
Va negvpyr <ph**********@lva.vagrenpprff.pbz>, tn*****@lva.vagrenpprff.pbz
fnlf... Va negvpyr <42***************@lnubb.pbz>, POSnypbare <po********@jbeyqarg.ngg.arg> jebgr:Ivpgbe Onmnebi jebgr: "vasbonua" <va******@ogvagrearg.pbz> jebgr... Abnu Eboregf jebgr: > vasbonua jebgr: > >> Cyrnfr abgr gung gur nobir vf whfg synzr onvg. Gur sbyybjhcf va gur >> bevtvany zrffntr qrzbafgengr guvf. Ab cbvag ercylvat gb uvf abafrafr. > > Jung bevtvavany zrffntr?
Bu, bxnl, lbh boivbhfyl unir orggre svygref guna zr. Fbeel sbe gur abvfr.
Vg unf abguvat gb qb jvgu svygref. Lbh punatrq gur Fhowrpg urnqre bs gur zrffntr, naq fbzr arjfernqref, yvxr Bhgybbx Rkcerff, qb abg chg vg va gur fnzr guernq. Gurl znxr vg frrz gung lbh fgnegrq nabgure guernq. Whfg SLV...
V qvqa'g ernyvmr BR jnf gung onq. Fb vg vf gbb fghcvq gb sbyybj gur ersreraprf punva?
Gur ceboyrz vf gung orgjrra crbcyr npprffvat Hfrarg ivn "Tbbtyr" naq ivn inevbhf ZF cebqhpgf, irel srj crbcyr npghnyyl hfr arjfernqref nalzber.
Znlor vs gubfr bs hf gung qb hfr arjfernqref nyy vafvfgrq ba *bayl* cbfgvat
va EBG13, vg jbhyq eha nyy gur bguref bss nsgre n juvyr, nf gurl tbg gverq bs
frrvat nyy gur "yvar abvfr", gura jr pbhyq or onpx gb Hfrarg bs 10 lrnef ntb.
--
Enaql Ubjneq (2ercyl erzbir SBBONE)
"Znxvat vg uneq gb qb fghcvq guvatf bsgra znxrf vg uneq
gb qb fzneg barf gbb." -- Naqerj Xbravt
"Tony Polson" <to*********@uku.co.uk> wrote in message
news:11**********************@f14g2000cwb.googlegr oups.com... Hi. Should I jump right into C++, or is it better to learn C first? I'm not a total beginner; I know Javascript, but I obviously would like to learn a more powerful language.
Hmm, this smells like a troll.
Note the followups set by the OP:
rec.photo.digital,rec.photo.equipment.35mm
-Mike
In article <MP************************@news.verizon.net>,
Randy Howard <ra*********@FOOverizonBAR.net> wrote: Va negvpyr <ph**********@lva.vagrenpprff.pbz>, tn*****@lva.vagrenpprff.pbz fnlf... Va negvpyr <42***************@lnubb.pbz>, POSnypbare <po********@jbeyqarg.ngg.arg> jebgr: >Ivpgbe Onmnebi jebgr: >> "vasbonua" <va******@ogvagrearg.pbz> jebgr... >>> Abnu Eboregf jebgr: >>>> vasbonua jebgr: >>>> >>>>> Cyrnfr abgr gung gur nobir vf whfg synzr onvg. Gur sbyybjhcf va gur >>>>> bevtvany zrffntr qrzbafgengr guvf. Ab cbvag ercylvat gb uvf abafrafr. >>>> >>>> Jung bevtvavany zrffntr? >>> >>> Bu, bxnl, lbh boivbhfyl unir orggre svygref guna zr. Fbeel sbe gur >>> abvfr. >> >> Vg unf abguvat gb qb jvgu svygref. Lbh punatrq gur Fhowrpg urnqre bs >> gur zrffntr, naq fbzr arjfernqref, yvxr Bhgybbx Rkcerff, qb abg chg vg >> va gur fnzr guernq. Gurl znxr vg frrz gung lbh fgnegrq nabgure guernq. >> Whfg SLV... > >V qvqa'g ernyvmr BR jnf gung onq. Fb vg vf gbb fghcvq gb sbyybj >gur ersreraprf punva? Gur ceboyrz vf gung orgjrra crbcyr npprffvat Hfrarg ivn "Tbbtyr" naq ivn inevbhf ZF cebqhpgf, irel srj crbcyr npghnyyl hfr arjfernqref nalzber.
Znlor vs gubfr bs hf gung qb hfr arjfernqref nyy vafvfgrq ba *bayl* cbfgvat va EBG13, vg jbhyq eha nyy gur bguref bss nsgre n juvyr, nf gurl tbg gverq bs frrvat nyy gur "yvar abvfr", gura jr pbhyq or onpx gb Hfrarg bs 10 lrnef ntb.
Jbexf sbe zr!
-- Enaql Ubjneq (2ercyl erzbir SBBONE) "Znxvat vg uneq gb qb fghcvq guvatf bsgra znxrf vg uneq gb qb fzneg barf gbb." -- Naqerj Xbravt
In comp.lang.c Kenny McCormack <ga*****@yin.interaccess.com> wrote: In article <MP************************@news.verizon.net>, Randy Howard <ra*********@FOOverizonBAR.net> wrote:Va negvpyr <ph**********@lva.vagrenpprff.pbz>, tn*****@lva.vagrenpprff.pbz fnlf... Va negvpyr <42***************@lnubb.pbz>, POSnypbare <po********@jbeyqarg.ngg.arg> jebgr: >Ivpgbe Onmnebi jebgr: >> "vasbonua" <va******@ogvagrearg.pbz> jebgr... >>> Abnu Eboregf jebgr: >>>> vasbonua jebgr: >>>> >>>>> Cyrnfr abgr gung gur nobir vf whfg synzr onvg. Gur sbyybjhcf va gur >>>>> bevtvany zrffntr qrzbafgengr guvf. Ab cbvag ercylvat gb uvf abafrafr. >>>> >>>> Jung bevtvavany zrffntr? >>> >>> Bu, bxnl, lbh boivbhfyl unir orggre svygref guna zr. Fbeel sbe gur >>> abvfr. >> >> Vg unf abguvat gb qb jvgu svygref. Lbh punatrq gur Fhowrpg urnqre bs >> gur zrffntr, naq fbzr arjfernqref, yvxr Bhgybbx Rkcerff, qb abg chg vg >> va gur fnzr guernq. Gurl znxr vg frrz gung lbh fgnegrq nabgure guernq. >> Whfg SLV... > >V qvqa'g ernyvmr BR jnf gung onq. Fb vg vf gbb fghcvq gb sbyybj >gur ersreraprf punva?
Gur ceboyrz vf gung orgjrra crbcyr npprffvat Hfrarg ivn "Tbbtyr" naq ivn inevbhf ZF cebqhpgf, irel srj crbcyr npghnyyl hfr arjfernqref nalzber. Znlor vs gubfr bs hf gung qb hfr arjfernqref nyy vafvfgrq ba *bayl* cbfgvat va EBG13, vg jbhyq eha nyy gur bguref bss nsgre n juvyr, nf gurl tbg gverq bs frrvat nyy gur "yvar abvfr", gura jr pbhyq or onpx gb Hfrarg bs 10 lrnef ntb.
Jbexf sbe zr!
Zr gbb;-)
--
\ Wraf Gubzf Gbreevat ___ Wr***********@culfvx.sh-oreyva.qr
\__________________________ uggc://jjj.gbreevat.qr
"Randy Howard" <ra*********@FOOverizonBAR.net> wrote in message
news:MP************************@news.verizon.net.. . I didn't realize OE was that bad. So it is too stupid to follow the references chain?
The problem is that between people accessing Usenet via "Google" and via various MS products, very few people actually use newsreaders anymore.
Maybe if those of us that do use newsreaders all insisted on *only* posting in ROT13, it would run all the others off after a while, as they got tired of seeing all the "line noise", then we could be back to Usenet of 10 years ago.
OE has ROT13 decoding, and also correctly handles threading of posts with
renamed subjects.
Ironically, Mozilla Thunderbird, my normal reader, doesn't.
Gregg
On Sun, 13 Feb 2005 01:13:40 GMT, Randy Howard
<ra*********@FOOverizonBAR.net> wrote: Va negvpyr <ph**********@lva.vagrenpprff.pbz>, tn*****@lva.vagrenpprff.pbz fnlf... Va negvpyr <42***************@lnubb.pbz>, POSnypbare <po********@jbeyqarg.ngg.arg> jebgr: >Ivpgbe Onmnebi jebgr: >> "vasbonua" <va******@ogvagrearg.pbz> jebgr... >>> Abnu Eboregf jebgr: >>>> vasbonua jebgr: >>>> >>>>> Cyrnfr abgr gung gur nobir vf whfg synzr onvg. Gur sbyybjhcf va gur >>>>> bevtvany zrffntr qrzbafgengr guvf. Ab cbvag ercylvat gb uvf abafrafr. >>>> >>>> Jung bevtvavany zrffntr? >>> >>> Bu, bxnl, lbh boivbhfyl unir orggre svygref guna zr. Fbeel sbe gur >>> abvfr. >> >> Vg unf abguvat gb qb jvgu svygref. Lbh punatrq gur Fhowrpg urnqre bs >> gur zrffntr, naq fbzr arjfernqref, yvxr Bhgybbx Rkcerff, qb abg chg vg >> va gur fnzr guernq. Gurl znxr vg frrz gung lbh fgnegrq nabgure guernq. >> Whfg SLV... > >V qvqa'g ernyvmr BR jnf gung onq. Fb vg vf gbb fghcvq gb sbyybj >gur ersreraprf punva?
Gur ceboyrz vf gung orgjrra crbcyr npprffvat Hfrarg ivn "Tbbtyr" naq ivn inevbhf ZF cebqhpgf, irel srj crbcyr npghnyyl hfr arjfernqref nalzber.
Znlor vs gubfr bs hf gung qb hfr arjfernqref nyy vafvfgrq ba *bayl* cbfgvat va EBG13, vg jbhyq eha nyy gur bguref bss nsgre n juvyr, nf gurl tbg gverq bs frrvat nyy gur "yvar abvfr", gura jr pbhyq or onpx gb Hfrarg bs 10 lrnef ntb.
Be jr pbhyq nyy hfr obsuarg naq tb onpx gb bayl hfvat freiref eha ol
crbcyr jr gehfg jub bayl npprcg hfref gurl gehfg...
Puevf P
gb wrote: "Randy Howard" <ra*********@FOOverizonBAR.net> wrote in message news:MP************************@news.verizon.net.. .
I didn't realize OE was that bad. So it is too stupid to follow the references chain?
The problem is that between people accessing Usenet via "Google" and via various MS products, very few people actually use newsreaders anymore.
Maybe if those of us that do use newsreaders all insisted on *only* posting in ROT13, it would run all the others off after a while, as they got tired of seeing all the "line noise", then we could be back to Usenet of 10 years ago.
OE has ROT13 decoding, and also correctly handles threading of posts with renamed subjects.
Ironically, Mozilla Thunderbird, my normal reader, doesn't.
Gregg
I use Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0 (Debian version) and it correctly
associated his message to the right topic.
--
Regards,
Matthias
gb wrote: "Randy Howard" <ra*********@FOOverizonBAR.net> wrote in message
.... snip ... Maybe if those of us that do use newsreaders all insisted on *only* posting in ROT13, it would run all the others off after a while, as they got tired of seeing all the "line noise", then we could be back to Usenet of 10 years ago.
OE has ROT13 decoding, and also correctly handles threading of posts with renamed subjects.
Ironically, Mozilla Thunderbird, my normal reader, doesn't.
Netscape 4.75 does. Very awkward to generate it though.
--
"If you want to post a followup via groups.google.com, don't use
the broken "Reply" link at the bottom of the article. Click on
"show options" at the top of the article, then click on the
"Reply" at the bottom of the article headers." - Keith Thompson
Va negvpyr <j%OCq.49941$O95.44800@ynxrernq02>, to@vainyvq.vainyvq
fnlf... "Enaql Ubjneq" <en*********@SBBirevmbaONE.arg> jebgr va zrffntr arjf:ZC************************@arjf.irevmba.arg.. . V qvqa'g ernyvmr BR jnf gung onq. Fb vg vf gbb fghcvq gb sbyybj gur ersreraprf punva?
Gur ceboyrz vf gung orgjrra crbcyr npprffvat Hfrarg ivn "Tbbtyr" naq ivn inevbhf ZF cebqhpgf, irel srj crbcyr npghnyyl hfr arjfernqref nalzber. Znlor vs gubfr bs hf gung qb hfr arjfernqref nyy vafvfgrq ba *bayl* cbfgvat va EBG13, vg jbhyq eha nyy gur bguref bss nsgre n juvyr, nf gurl tbg gverq bs frrvat nyy gur "yvar abvfr", gura jr pbhyq or onpx gb Hfrarg bs 10 lrnef ntb.
BR unf EBG13 qrpbqvat, naq nyfb pbeerpgyl unaqyrf guernqvat bs cbfgf jvgu eranzrq fhowrpgf.
Ubj znal VR hfref jbhyq rira xabj jung jung EBG13 vf jura gurl frr
vg?
Vebavpnyyl, Zbmvyyn Guhaqreoveq, zl abezny ernqre, qbrfa'g.
Guhaqreoveq vf n terng rznvy ercynprzrag sbe Bhgybbx be BR. Vg vfa'g
fhpu n terng arjfernqre.
--
Enaql Ubjneq (2ercyl erzbir SBBONE)
"Znxvat vg uneq gb qb fghcvq guvatf bsgra znxrf vg uneq
gb qb fzneg barf gbb." -- Naqerj Xbravt
On Sun, 13 Feb 2005 11:33:57 GMT, Randy Howard
<ra*********@FOOverizonBAR.net> wrote: Ubj znal VR hfref jbhyq rira xabj jung jung EBG13 vf jura gurl frr vg?
Zber guna erpbtavfr Jryfu jura gurl frr gung (vg'f shaal jngpuvat gurz
hfr EBG13 naq svaq gung vg /fgvyy/ qbrfa'g znxr frafr!).
Guhaqreoveq vf n terng rznvy ercynprzrag sbe Bhgybbx be BR. Vg vfa'g fhpu n terng arjfernqre.
Vf vg fhccbfrq gb or? V gubhtug gung gurl fcyvg bss gur arjfernqre
cneg.
(V hfr zhgg naq fyea, obgu grkg-bayl naq obgu pbzcyrgryl fnsr sebz
nggnpurq yvaxf naq UGZY -- nygubhtu V hfr na rkgreany pbzznaq gb perngr
EBG13 zrffntrf sebz ivz, obgu pna qrpbqr gurz...)
Puevf P
Matthias wrote: gb wrote:
"Randy Howard" <ra*********@FOOverizonBAR.net> wrote in message news:MP************************@news.verizon.net.. .
> I didn't realize OE was that bad. So it is too stupid to follow > the references chain?
The problem is that between people accessing Usenet via "Google" and via various MS products, very few people actually use newsreaders anymore.
Maybe if those of us that do use newsreaders all insisted on *only* posting in ROT13, it would run all the others off after a while, as they got tired of seeing all the "line noise", then we could be back to Usenet of 10 years ago. OE has ROT13 decoding, and also correctly handles threading of posts with renamed subjects.
Ironically, Mozilla Thunderbird, my normal reader, doesn't.
Gregg
I use Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0 (Debian version) and it correctly associated his message to the right topic.
Sorry, I meant handling rot13. I added the bit about threading after I
wrote about rot13.
Gregg
Va negvpyr <42**************@vainyvq.vainyvq>, to@vainyvq.vainyvq
fnlf... Zngguvnf jebgr: to jebgr:
"Enaql Ubjneq" <en*********@SBBirevmbaONE.arg> jebgr va zrffntr arjf:ZC************************@arjf.irevmba.arg.. .
>> V qvqa'g ernyvmr BR jnf gung onq. Fb vg vf gbb fghcvq gb sbyybj >> gur ersreraprf punva? > > > Gur ceboyrz vf gung orgjrra crbcyr npprffvat Hfrarg ivn "Tbbtyr" > naq ivn inevbhf ZF cebqhpgf, irel srj crbcyr npghnyyl hfr > arjfernqref nalzber.
Znlor vs gubfr bs hf gung qb hfr arjfernqref nyy vafvfgrq ba *bayl* cbfgvat va EBG13, vg jbhyq eha nyy gur bguref bss nsgre n juvyr, nf gurl tbg gverq bs frrvat nyy gur "yvar abvfr", gura jr pbhyq or onpx gb Hfrarg bs 10 lrnef ntb. BR unf EBG13 qrpbqvat, naq nyfb pbeerpgyl unaqyrf guernqvat bs cbfgf jvgu eranzrq fhowrpgf.
Vebavpnyyl, Zbmvyyn Guhaqreoveq, zl abezny ernqre, qbrfa'g.
Tertt
V hfr Zbmvyyn Guhaqreoveq 1.0 (Qrovna irefvba) naq vg pbeerpgyl nffbpvngrq uvf zrffntr gb gur evtug gbcvp.
Fbeel, V zrnag unaqyvat ebg13. V nqqrq gur ovg nobhg guernqvat nsgre V jebgr nobhg ebg13.
Tertt
Lbh qb ernyvmr gung cbfgvat jung jnf cerivbhfyl ebg13 rapbqrq va gur
pyrne qrsrngf gur jubyr checbfr, qba'g lbh?
--
Enaql Ubjneq (2ercyl erzbir SBBONE)
"Znxvat vg uneq gb qb fghcvq guvatf bsgra znxrf vg uneq
gb qb fzneg barf gbb." -- Naqerj Xbravt
I don't understand why all this talk about OE. Plain truth is that the
OP never showed up on my newsserver. Obviously they have better filters
than yours and so you seem to think I must be using OE. Maybe if you
guys were as smart as you think you are you would look in the headers at
the User-Agent and see that I am not.
And for those that think they are so fucking cool and have us
stupidasses all outsmarted:
Gnyxvat penc nobhg crbcyr va pbqr vf sbe chffvrf naq ovgpurf.
If you guys don't like the rest of us then why are you here?
For those that don't know what they are doing:
tr [a-zA-Z] [n-za-mN-ZA-M]
'man tr' if you don't know what that does. I am sure there is a windows
equivelent command for Rot13 (en/de)coding but I don't know it.
To tell the truth though, none of it is worth decoding. Just a bunch of
elitist cowards in the middle of a big back biting circle jerk.
"Victor Bazarov" <v.********@comAcast.net> wrote: "infobahn" <in******@btinternet.com> wrote... Noah Roberts wrote: What origininal message?
Oh, okay, you obviously have better filters than me. Sorry for the noise.
It has nothing to do with filters. You changed the Subject header of the message, and some newsreaders, like Outlook Express, do not put it in the same thread.
Then OE is not a newsreader. Film at eleven.
Richard
"Richard Bos" <rl*@hoekstra-uitgeverij.nl> wrote in message
news:42****************@news.individual.net... "Victor Bazarov" <v.********@comAcast.net> wrote:
"infobahn" <in******@btinternet.com> wrote... Noah Roberts wrote: > > What origininal message?
Oh, okay, you obviously have better filters than me. Sorry for the noise.
It has nothing to do with filters. You changed the Subject header of the message, and some newsreaders, like Outlook Express, do not put it in the same thread.
Then OE is not a newsreader. Film at eleven.
My OE (v6.0, 'out of the box') retains the threading, even
if the subject line is modified.
-Mike
"Victor Bazarov" <v.********@comAcast.net> wrote in message
news:39********************@comcast.com... "Tony Polson" <to*********@uku.co.uk> wrote... Hi. Should I jump right into C++, or is it better to learn C first?
Jump right into C++. Only learn C if you want to learn C.
I'm not a total beginner; I know Javascript, but I obviously would like to learn a more powerful language.
Obviously. Why you set your follow-ups to photography newsgroups is still a mystery though. Trolling?
He wants to C through his camera lens. :-)
-Mike
Mike Wahler wrote: "Richard Bos" <rl*@hoekstra-uitgeverij.nl> wrote in message news:42****************@news.individual.net... "Victor Bazarov" <v.********@comAcast.net> wrote:
"infobahn" <in******@btinternet.com> wrote... > Noah Roberts wrote: >> >> What origininal message? > > Oh, okay, you obviously have better filters than me. Sorry for
the > noise.
It has nothing to do with filters. You changed the Subject
header of the message, and some newsreaders, like Outlook Express, do not
put it in the same thread.
Then OE is not a newsreader. Film at eleven.
My OE (v6.0, 'out of the box') retains the threading, even if the subject line is modified.
What is really stupid about this whole thing is that I don't use OE. I
use mozilla at home, where the OP never arrived, and google at
work...where it did.
The troller probably thought they would start a flame about C vs. C++.
What is funny is that they started a flame war about a completely off
topic subject without even being off topic.
If all these rot13 bozos want to 'fix' usenet I think this thread shows
that the best way to do that is for them to just leave.
On Mon, 14 Feb 2005 08:35:16 GMT, in comp.lang.c , rl*@hoekstra-uitgeverij.nl (Richard Bos) wrote: "Victor Bazarov" <v.********@comAcast.net> wrote:
It has nothing to do with filters. You changed the Subject header of the message, and some newsreaders, like Outlook Express, do not put it in the same thread. Then OE is not a newsreader.
Several other newsreaders also rely on the subject to thread properly,
Forte Agent amongst them. I suspect you can't claim that this isn't a
newsreader, no matter how rabidly anti-MS one might feel... :-)
Film at eleven.
Bandits at 12 o'clock, wingco, roger and out.
--
Mark McIntyre
CLC FAQ <http://www.eskimo.com/~scs/C-faq/top.html>
CLC readme: <http://www.ungerhu.com/jxh/clc.welcome.txt>
----== Posted via Newsfeeds.Com - Unlimited-Uncensored-Secure Usenet News==---- http://www.newsfeeds.com The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World! 120,000+ Newsgroups
----= East and West-Coast Server Farms - Total Privacy via Encryption =----
On Mon, 14 Feb 2005 23:12:19 +0000, Mark McIntyre
<ma**********@spamcop.net> wrote: On Mon, 14 Feb 2005 08:35:16 GMT, in comp.lang.c , rl*@hoekstra-uitgeverij.nl (Richard Bos) wrote:
"Victor Bazarov" <v.********@comAcast.net> wrote:
It has nothing to do with filters. You changed the Subject header of the message, and some newsreaders, like Outlook Express, do not put it in the same thread.
Then OE is not a newsreader.
Several other newsreaders also rely on the subject to thread properly, Forte Agent amongst them. I suspect you can't claim that this isn't a newsreader, no matter how rabidly anti-MS one might feel... :-)
Agent gives you the choice. In General Options, go to Display->Message
List Pane->Start New Thread if Subject Changes and uncheck it. Film at eleven.
Bandits at 12 o'clock, wingco, roger and out.
--
Al Balmer
Balmer Consulting re************************@att.net
Mark McIntyre <ma**********@spamcop.net> wrote: On Mon, 14 Feb 2005 08:35:16 GMT, in comp.lang.c , rl*@hoekstra-uitgeverij.nl (Richard Bos) wrote:
"Victor Bazarov" <v.********@comAcast.net> wrote:
It has nothing to do with filters. You changed the Subject header of the message, and some newsreaders, like Outlook Express, do not put it in the same thread.
Then OE is not a newsreader.
Several other newsreaders also rely on the subject to thread properly, Forte Agent amongst them.
This is extremely unlikely to be true. I use Forte Free Agent, and it
threads perfectly using the References header. I would be flabbergasted
to hear that the commercial Forte Agent has been made a downgrade, by
taking this feature out.
(Hint: Opions -> Message List -> the various threading options.)
(I also note that the premise of that "Then", as claimed by Victor, is
not true, according to several others. The film that was planned for
eleven o'clock has been canceled.)
Richard
"Noah Roberts" <nr******@dontemailme.com> wrote in message
news:11*************@corp.supernews.com... To tell the truth though, none of it is worth decoding. Just a bunch
of elitist cowards in the middle of a big back biting circle jerk.
Raise a Black Flag or call the Redd Kross!
--
Mabden
"CBFalconer" <cb********@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:42***************@yahoo.com... Victor Bazarov wrote:
[snip] It has nothing to do with filters. You changed the Subject header of the message, and some newsreaders, like Outlook Express, do not put it in the same thread. They make it seem that you started another thread.
I didn't realize OE was that bad. So it is too stupid to follow the references chain?
Since v5 of OE (at least), messages with *different* subjects that *are*
(according to the References header) parts of a single thread are displayed
as such. But messages with the *same* subjects that *aren't* parts of a
single thread are shown as if they were. This has both advantages and
disadvantages.
(I think "same" is a case-insensitive comparison, and probably ignores a
"Re:" prefix if present.)
Alex This thread has been closed and replies have been disabled. Please start a new discussion. Similar topics
by: TG |
last post by:
Dear PHP Group,
I have two forms that are used to collect user information. The first one
takes user inputted values such as fullname, city, address etc. I want these
values to display in the...
|
by: Anna |
last post by:
Hi all,
I posted the same question this afternoon but my message isn't showing up, so I thought I'd give it another try....
in case you should see it later I apologize for posting the same...
|
by: Guy |
last post by:
I would like to calculate the time it takes to load a picture in tenths of a
seconds. So I get the current time, load the image, and once loaded I get
the current time again.
I would like to...
|
by: Jörg Striegnitz |
last post by:
We apologize if you have received this CfP multiple times.
--------------------------------------------------------------------
SECOND CALL FOR CONTRIBUTIONS AND PARTICIPATION
Workshop on...
|
by: src_mag |
last post by:
Hello,
I'd like to write JavaScript code that refreshes a frame once a second
loading a different image each time. Basically, here's what the script
would do:
0 sec load img0.gif
1 sec load...
|
by: Torsten Grust |
last post by:
Second Call for Papers
X I M E - P 2 0 0 6
3rd International Workshop on
XQuery Implementation, Experience and Perspectives
June 30, 2006
Collocated with ACM SIGMOD/PODS 2006, Chicago, USA...
|
by: galathaea |
last post by:
On Mar 2, 11:29 pm, galath...@veawb.coop (galathaea) wrote:
still being very naive about this whole crackpot / crank thing
i accidentally let the engineer inside think too hard about this
...
|
by: Bob Nelson |
last post by:
Right next to K&R2 on my bookshelf is _C Programming: A Modern Approach_ by
Professor K.N. King. The second edition of this book is now available. See
this URL for details:
...
|
by: Buddha |
last post by:
Hello,
I posted this on two forums, without too much help .. and I am kinda
stuck in this.
I need to refresh the parent page from the second child window which
is opened by the first child and...
|
by: zion4ever |
last post by:
Hello good people,
Please bear with me as this is my first post and I am relative new to ASP. I do have VB6 experience. I have a form which enables users within our company to do an intranet...
|
by: ryjfgjl |
last post by:
ExcelToDatabase: batch import excel into database automatically...
|
by: isladogs |
last post by:
The next Access Europe meeting will be on Wednesday 6 Mar 2024 starting at 18:00 UK time (6PM UTC) and finishing at about 19:15 (7.15PM).
In this month's session, we are pleased to welcome back...
|
by: isladogs |
last post by:
The next Access Europe meeting will be on Wednesday 6 Mar 2024 starting at 18:00 UK time (6PM UTC) and finishing at about 19:15 (7.15PM).
In this month's session, we are pleased to welcome back...
|
by: Vimpel783 |
last post by:
Hello!
Guys, I found this code on the Internet, but I need to modify it a little. It works well, the problem is this: Data is sent from only one cell, in this case B5, but it is necessary that data...
|
by: jfyes |
last post by:
As a hardware engineer, after seeing that CEIWEI recently released a new tool for Modbus RTU Over TCP/UDP filtering and monitoring, I actively went to its official website to take a look. It turned...
|
by: PapaRatzi |
last post by:
Hello,
I am teaching myself MS Access forms design and Visual Basic. I've created a table to capture a list of Top 30 singles and forms to capture new entries. The final step is a form (unbound)...
|
by: CloudSolutions |
last post by:
Introduction:
For many beginners and individual users, requiring a credit card and email registration may pose a barrier when starting to use cloud servers. However, some cloud server providers now...
|
by: af34tf |
last post by:
Hi Guys, I have a domain whose name is BytesLimited.com, and I want to sell it. Does anyone know about platforms that allow me to list my domain in auction for free. Thank you
|
by: isladogs |
last post by:
The next Access Europe User Group meeting will be on Wednesday 3 Apr 2024 starting at 18:00 UK time (6PM UTC+1) and finishing by 19:30 (7.30PM).
In this session, we are pleased to welcome former...
| |