That response wasn't supposed to appear on that thread. I'm still not
sure how it did. It made alot more sense on the correct thread.
9  1327  jn**@hotmail.com (JNY) wrote: That response wasn't supposed to appear on that thread. I'm still not
sure how it did. It made alot more sense on the correct thread.
_What_ response on _what_ thread? You have managed to get
Google-Broken-Beta remove every single reference from your post. Learn
to force Google-Broken-Beta to thread correctly (and quote correctly,
and indent correctly, and, and, and...) or get a real newsreader. The
way you're posting now it's nearly impossible to figure out what you're
talking about.
Richard jn**@hotmail.com (JNY) writes: That response wasn't supposed to appear on that thread. I'm still not
sure how it did. It made alot more sense on the correct thread.
If you want to post a followup via groups.google.com, don't use the
"Reply" link at the bottom of the article. Click on "show options" at
the top of the article, then click on the "Reply" at the bottom of the
article headers.
--
Keith Thompson (The_Other_Keith) ks***@mib.org <http://www.ghoti.net/~kst>
San Diego Supercomputer Center <*> <http://users.sdsc.edu/~kst>
We must do something. This is something. Therefore, we must do this.
Keith Thompson wrote: jn**@hotmail.com (JNY) writes:
That response wasn't supposed to appear on that thread. I'm still not
sure how it did. It made alot more sense on the correct thread.
If you want to post a followup via groups.google.com, don't use the
"Reply" link at the bottom of the article. Click on "show options" at
the top of the article, then click on the "Reply" at the bottom of the
article headers.
I have taken the liberty of modifying your comment as a sig, whose
use will be periodic until google actually fixes their interface.
--
"If you want to post a followup via groups.google.com, don't use
the broken "Reply" link at the bottom of the article. Click on
"show options" at the top of the article, then click on the
"Reply" at the bottom of the article headers." - Keith Thompson
CBFalconer <cb********@yahoo.com> writes: Keith Thompson wrote: jn**@hotmail.com (JNY) writes:
That response wasn't supposed to appear on that thread. I'm still not
sure how it did. It made alot more sense on the correct thread.
If you want to post a followup via groups.google.com, don't use the
"Reply" link at the bottom of the article. Click on "show options" at
the top of the article, then click on the "Reply" at the bottom of the
article headers.
I have taken the liberty of modifying your comment as a sig, whose
use will be periodic until google actually fixes their interface.
--
"If you want to post a followup via groups.google.com, don't use
the broken "Reply" link at the bottom of the article. Click on
"show options" at the top of the article, then click on the
"Reply" at the bottom of the article headers." - Keith Thompson
I'm not too pleased about being quoted inexactly, so ...
If you want to post a followup via groups.google.com, don't use
the broken "Reply" link at the bottom of the article. Click on
"show options" at the top of the article, then click on the
"Reply" at the bottom of the article headers.
Your quotation is now retroactively exact.
It's an honor to be quoted in someone else's sig. See below.
--
Keith Thompson (The_Other_Keith) ks***@mib.org <http://www.ghoti.net/~kst>
San Diego Supercomputer Center <*> <http://users.sdsc.edu/~kst>
"I have taken the liberty of modifying your comment as a sig, whose use will
be periodic until google actually fixes their interface." -- CBFalconer
"Keith Thompson" <ks***@mib.org> wrote in message
news:ln************@nuthaus.mib.org... CBFalconer <cb********@yahoo.com> writes: Keith Thompson wrote: jn**@hotmail.com (JNY) writes:
That response wasn't supposed to appear on that thread. I'm still not
sure how it did. It made alot more sense on the correct thread.
If you want to post a followup via groups.google.com, don't use the
"Reply" link at the bottom of the article. Click on "show options" at
the top of the article, then click on the "Reply" at the bottom of the
article headers.
I have taken the liberty of modifying your comment as a sig, whose
use will be periodic until google actually fixes their interface.
--
"If you want to post a followup via groups.google.com, don't use
the broken "Reply" link at the bottom of the article. Click on
"show options" at the top of the article, then click on the
"Reply" at the bottom of the article headers." - Keith Thompson
I'm not too pleased about being quoted inexactly, so ...
If you want to post a followup via groups.google.com, don't use
the broken "Reply" link at the bottom of the article. Click on
"show options" at the top of the article, then click on the
"Reply" at the bottom of the article headers.
What's different?
(I took my car to a mechanic today. When he asked what the trouble
was, I told him "When I applied the brakes, it groups.googled, and
went right through the red light.")
-Mike
--
I use google only for web searches, like God intended.
Keith Thompson <ks***@mib.org> writes: It's an honor to be quoted in someone else's sig. See below.
I agree.
--
It's an honor to be quoted in someone else's sig. See below.
Ben Pfaff <bl*@cs.stanford.edu> writes: Keith Thompson <ks***@mib.org> writes:
It's an honor to be quoted in someone else's sig. See below.
I agree.
Me too.
(That should be just about enough, I think.)
--
Keith Thompson (The_Other_Keith) ks***@mib.org <http://www.ghoti.net/~kst>
San Diego Supercomputer Center <*> <http://users.sdsc.edu/~kst>
"It's an honor to be quoted in someone else's sig. See below." -- Ben Pfaff
"Mike Wahler" <mk******@mkwahler.net> writes: "Keith Thompson" <ks***@mib.org> wrote in message
news:ln************@nuthaus.mib.org... CBFalconer <cb********@yahoo.com> writes: > Keith Thompson wrote:
>> jn**@hotmail.com (JNY) writes:
>>
>>> That response wasn't supposed to appear on that thread. I'm still not
>>> sure how it did. It made alot more sense on the correct thread.
>>
>> If you want to post a followup via groups.google.com, don't use the
>> "Reply" link at the bottom of the article. Click on "show options" at
>> the top of the article, then click on the "Reply" at the bottom of the
>> article headers.
>
> I have taken the liberty of modifying your comment as a sig, whose
> use will be periodic until google actually fixes their interface.
>
> --
> "If you want to post a followup via groups.google.com, don't use
> the broken "Reply" link at the bottom of the article. Click on
> "show options" at the top of the article, then click on the
> "Reply" at the bottom of the article headers." - Keith Thompson
I'm not too pleased about being quoted inexactly, so ...
If you want to post a followup via groups.google.com, don't use
the broken "Reply" link at the bottom of the article. Click on
"show options" at the top of the article, then click on the
"Reply" at the bottom of the article headers.
What's different?
In my original statement, I wrote "don't use the "Reply" link".
CBFalconer amended it to "don't use the broken "Reply" link".
--
Keith Thompson (The_Other_Keith) ks***@mib.org <http://www.ghoti.net/~kst>
San Diego Supercomputer Center <*> <http://users.sdsc.edu/~kst>
We must do something. This is something. Therefore, we must do this.
"Keith Thompson" <ks***@mib.org> wrote in message
news:ln************@nuthaus.mib.org...
In my original statement, I wrote "don't use the "Reply" link".
CBFalconer amended it to "don't use the broken "Reply" link".
Ah. I suppose I have a broken visual parser. :-)
-Mike This thread has been closed and replies have been disabled. Please start a new discussion. Similar topics
by: Norvin Laudon |
last post by:
Hi,
Can somebody explain the following, from the MSDN documentation for the
"System.Convert.ToInt32(double)" function
<quote>
Return Value
value rounded to the nearest 32-bit signed...
|
by: spebola |
last post by:
I am using vb.net 2003 professional and I get the following results
when using the round method:
dim Amount as decimal = 180.255
Amount = Amount.Round(Amount, 2)
Amount now contains 180.25. ...
|
by: Zorpiedoman |
last post by:
Howcome:
Dim D as decimal = .5D
msgbox d.Round(D, 0)
this returns "0"
Now when I went to school .5 rounds UP to 1 not DOWN to zero?????!!!
Documentation says this, but what the heck are...
|
by: Jiri Nemec |
last post by:
Hello all,
I have got one table with rounding values, table contains
prices and round types.
id price_from price_to rounding
1 0 1500 0.1
2 1500 ...
|
by: cj |
last post by:
Lets assume all calculations are done with decimal data types so things
are as precise as possible.
When it comes to the final rounding to cut a check to pay dividends for
example in VB rounding...
|
by: jdrott1 |
last post by:
i'm trying to round my currency string to end in 9. it's for a
pricing application.
this is the function i'm using to get the item in currency:
FormatCurrency(BoxCost, , , , TriState.True)
if...
|
by: Spoon |
last post by:
Hello everyone,
I don't understand how the lrint() function works.
long lrint(double x);
The function returns the nearest long integer to x, consistent with the
current rounding mode. It...
|
by: md |
last post by:
Hi
Does any body know, how to round a double value with a specific number
of digits after the decimal points?
A function like this:
RoundMyDouble (double &value, short numberOfPrecisions)
...
|
by: jacob navia |
last post by:
Hi
"How can I round a number to x decimal places" ?
This question keeps appearing. I would propose the following
solution
#include <float.h>
#include <math.h>
|
by: bdsatish |
last post by:
The built-in function round( ) will always "round up", that is 1.5 is
rounded to 2.0 and 2.5 is rounded to 3.0.
If I want to round to the nearest even, that is
my_round(1.5) = 2 # As...
|
by: ryjfgjl |
last post by:
In our work, we often receive Excel tables with data in the same format. If we want to analyze these data, it can be difficult to analyze them because the data is spread across multiple Excel files...
|
by: BarryA |
last post by:
What are the essential steps and strategies outlined in the Data Structures and Algorithms (DSA) roadmap for aspiring data scientists? How can individuals effectively utilize this roadmap to progress...
|
by: nemocccc |
last post by:
hello, everyone, I want to develop a software for my android phone for daily needs, any suggestions?
|
by: Hystou |
last post by:
There are some requirements for setting up RAID:
1. The motherboard and BIOS support RAID configuration.
2. The motherboard has 2 or more available SATA protocol SSD/HDD slots (including MSATA, M.2...
|
by: Hystou |
last post by:
Most computers default to English, but sometimes we require a different language, especially when relocating. Forgot to request a specific language before your computer shipped? No problem! You can...
|
by: Oralloy |
last post by:
Hello folks,
I am unable to find appropriate documentation on the type promotion of bit-fields when using the generalised comparison operator "<=>".
The problem is that using the GNU compilers,...
|
by: jinu1996 |
last post by:
In today's digital age, having a compelling online presence is paramount for businesses aiming to thrive in a competitive landscape. At the heart of this digital strategy lies an intricately woven...
|
by: tracyyun |
last post by:
Dear forum friends,
With the development of smart home technology, a variety of wireless communication protocols have appeared on the market, such as Zigbee, Z-Wave, Wi-Fi, Bluetooth, etc. Each...
|
by: agi2029 |
last post by:
Let's talk about the concept of autonomous AI software engineers and no-code agents. These AIs are designed to manage the entire lifecycle of a software development project—planning, coding, testing,...
| |
