Parser

[Bill Cunningham]

In comp.programming I asked for advice for writing a parser. The code
someone showed me wouldn't compile. I don't know what's wrong. I just want
to write the simpliest of parsers.

int parser(FILE *in,FILE *out);

int main(void){
parser(stdin,stdout);
return0;}

Won't compile. My guess is maybe this should be written

parser(&stdin,&stdout);

But that's my opinion.

Bill

[Joona I Palaste]

Bill Cunningham <no****@nspam.net> scribbled the following:

In comp.programming I asked for advice for writing a parser. The code
someone showed me wouldn't compile. I don't know what's wrong. I just want
to write the simpliest of parsers. int parser(FILE *in,FILE *out); int main(void){
parser(stdin,stdout);
return0;} Won't compile. My guess is maybe this should be written parser(&stdin,&stdout); But that's my opinion.

Your opinion is wrong. stdin and stdout are of type FILE *, not of
type FILE. The reason it won't compile is the same as in your
previous post - the function parser() isn't defined anywhere, just
declared.

--
/-- Joona Palaste (pa*****@cc.helsinki.fi) ------------- Finland --------\
\-- http://www.helsinki.fi/~palaste --------------------- rules! --------/
"Remember: There are only three kinds of people - those who can count and those
who can't."
- Vampyra

[Mike Wahler]

"Joona I Palaste" <pa*****@cc.helsinki.fi> wrote in message
news:c5**********@oravannahka.helsinki.fi...

Bill Cunningham <no****@nspam.net> scribbled the following:

In comp.programming I asked for advice for writing a parser. The code someone showed me wouldn't compile. I don't know what's wrong. I just want to write the simpliest of parsers.

int parser(FILE *in,FILE *out);

int main(void){
parser(stdin,stdout);
return0;}

Won't compile. My guess is maybe this should be written

parser(&stdin,&stdout);

But that's my opinion.

Your opinion is wrong. stdin and stdout are of type FILE *, not of
type FILE. The reason it won't compile is the same as in your
previous post - the function parser() isn't defined anywhere, just
declared.

That won't stop a compile (but the missing #include <stdio.h>
as well as the syntax error in the 'return' statement will.)
The missing definition will prevent successful linking
though.

-Mike

[Martin Ambuhl]

Bill Cunningham wrote:

In comp.programming I asked for advice for writing a parser. The code
someone showed me wouldn't compile. I don't know what's wrong. I just want
to write the simpliest of parsers.

int parser(FILE *in,FILE *out);

int main(void){
parser(stdin,stdout);
return0;}

Won't compile. My guess is maybe this should be written

parser(&stdin,&stdout);

But that's my opinion.

And it's a bad one. The following should compile without diagnostics:

#include <stdio.h>

int parser(FILE * in, FILE * out);

int main(void)
{
parser(stdin, stdout);
return 0;
}

int parser(FILE * in, FILE * out)
{
(void) in; /* noops here to quiet */
(void) out; /* 'unused parameter' warnings. */
return 0;
}

[Bill Cunningham]

int parser(FILE * in, FILE * out)
{
(void) in; /* noops here to quiet */
(void) out; /* 'unused parameter' warnings. */
return 0;
}

What do the voids in parenthesis mean? Are they casts? This NG always
makes me feel dumb.

Bill

[Julien Oster]

"Bill Cunningham" <no****@nspam.net> writes:

Hello Bill,

int parser(FILE * in, FILE * out)
{
(void) in; /* noops here to quiet */
(void) out; /* 'unused parameter' warnings. */
return 0;
}

What do the voids in parenthesis mean? Are they casts? This NG always
makes me feel dumb.

Yes! It's a cast. A cast to void seems pretty useless, especially in
this case where the casted value isn't even used, but it's actually
quite useful here to remove the warning.

Julien